Cited by 52Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFree Will and Agency

Volitional components of consciousness vary across wakefulness, dreaming and lucid dreaming

Open access
Dresler, Martin, Eibl, Leandra, Fischer, Christian F. J., Wehrle, Renate, Spoormaker, Victor I., Steiger, Axel, Czisch, Michael, Pawlowski, Marcel·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Consciousness is a multifaceted concept; its different aspects vary across species, vigilance states, or health conditions. While basal aspects of consciousness like perceptions and emotions are present in many states and species, higher-order aspects like reflective or volitional capabilities seem to be most pronounced in awake humans. Here we assess the experience of volition across different states of consciousness: 10 frequent lucid dreamers rated different aspects of volition according to the Volitional Components Questionnaire for phases of normal dreaming, lucid dreaming, and wakefulness. Overall, experienced volition was comparable for lucid dreaming and wakefulness, and rated significantly higher for both states compared to non-lucid dreaming. However, three subscales showed specific differences across states of consciousness: planning ability was most pronounced during wakefulness, intention enactment most pronounced during lucid dreaming, and self-determination most pronounced during both wakefulness and lucid dreaming. Our data confirm the multifaceted nature of consciousness: different higher-order aspects of consciousness are differentially expressed across different conscious states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00987

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dream lucidity led dreamers to affect oneiric contents, also altering their emotional negative charge.

    “In other words, dream lucidity led dreamers to affect oneiric contents, also altering their emotional negative charge (Dresler et al., 2011, 2014).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Dresler et al., 2014

    The Discussion (Lucid Dreaming as Higher-Order Consciousness; page unavailable) says lucid dreamers can volitionally execute intentions within the dream narrative, supporting the claim that they can affect dream content. The passages on emotions do not say that lucidity alters their negative charge. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dresler, M., Eibl, L., Fischer, C. F. J., Wehrle, R., Spoormaker, V. I., Steiger, A., Czisch, M., & Pawlowski, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Corresponding author
Dresler, Martin
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014
Volume
4
Pages
987-987
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095706928
Cited by
52
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
volition, consciousness, lucid dreaming, dreams, wakefulness, planning skills, self-determination, higher-order consciousness, states of consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review