Cited by 38Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research TopicsHealth disparities and outcomes

Loneliness and schizotypy are distinct constructs, separate from general psychopathology

Open access
Badcock, Johanna C., Barkus, Emma, Cohen, Alex S., Bucks, Romola, Badcock, David R.·2016·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Loneliness is common in youth and associated with a significantly increased risk of psychological disorders. Although loneliness is strongly associated with psychosis, its relationship with psychosis proneness is unclear. Our aim in this paper was to test the hypothesis that loneliness and schizotypal traits, conveying risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, are similar but separate constructs. Pooling data from two non-clinical student samples (N = 551) we modeled the structure of the relationship between loneliness and trait schizotypy. Loneliness was assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), whilst negative (Social Anhedonia) and positive (Perceptual Aberrations) schizotypal traits were assessed with the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales-Brief (WSS-B). Fit statistics indicated that the best fitting model of UCLA-3 scores comprises three correlated factors (Isolation, Related Connectedness, and Collective Connectedness), consistent with previous reports. Fit statistics for a two factor model of positive and negative schizotypy were excellent. Next, bi-factor analysis was used to model a general psychopatholgy factor (p) across the three loneliness factors and separate negative and positive schizotypy traits. The results showed that all items (except 1) co-loaded on p. However, with the influence of p removed, additional variance remained within separate sub-factors, indicating that loneliness and negative and positive trait schizotypy are distinct and separable constructs. Similarly, once shared variance with p was removed, correlations between sub-factors of loneliness and schizotypal traits were non-significant. These findings have important clinical implications since they suggest that loneliness should not be conflated with the expression of schizotypy. Rather, loneliness needs to be specifically targeted for assessment and treatment in youth at risk for psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01018

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of social anhedonia in healthy young adults are associated with high levels of loneliness.

    “Nonetheless, high levels of social anhedonia—at least in healthy young adults—are associated with high levels of loneliness (39).”

    From A transdiagnostic perspective on social anhedonia (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badcock, J. C., Barkus, E., Cohen, A. S., Bucks, R., & Badcock, D. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Badcock, Johanna C.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2016-07-07
Volume
7
Pages
1018-1018
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469114046
Cited by
38
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP110104553)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
loneliness, psychosis proneness, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, general psychopathology, social anhedonia, perceptual aberration, UCLA Loneliness Scale, construct validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review