Cited by 21Student Stress and CopingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effects of an Inquiry-Based Short Intervention on State Test Anxiety in Comparison to Alternative Coping Strategies

Open access
Krispenz, Ann, Dickhäuser, Oliver·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Test anxiety can have undesirable consequences for learning and academic achievement. The control-value theory of achievement emotions assumes that test anxiety is experienced if a student appraises an achievement situation as important (value appraisal), but feels that the situation and its outcome are not fully under his or her control (control appraisal). Accordingly, modification of cognitive appraisals is assumed to reduce test anxiety. One method aiming at the modification of appraisals is inquiry-based stress reduction. In the present study (N = 162), we assessed the effects of an inquiry-based short intervention on test anxiety. Design: Short-term longitudinal, randomized control trial. Methods: Focusing on an individual worry thought, 53 university students received an inquiry-based short intervention. Control participants reflected on their worry thought (n = 55) or were distracted (n = 52). Thought related test anxiety was assessed before, immediately after, and two days after the experimental treatment. Results: After the intervention as well as two days later, individuals who had received the inquiry-based intervention demonstrated significantly lower test anxiety than participants from the pooled control groups. Further analyses showed that the inquiry-based short intervention was more effective than reflecting on a worry thought but had no advantage over distraction. Conclusions: Our findings provide first experimental evidence for the effectiveness of an inquiry-based short intervention in reducing students’ test anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00201

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Krispenz and Dickhäuser et al. presented the effectiveness of an IBSR intervention in reducing students' academic procrastination and test anxiety.

    “Krispenz and Dickhäuser et al. presented the effectiveness of an IBSR intervention in reducing students’ academic procrastination and test anxiety [57,58].”

    From Inquiry based stress reduction (Ibsr) improves overall stuttering experience among adults who stutter: A randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Conclusion and Discussion report that the IBSR intervention reduced test anxiety in university students. The paper does not report a reduction in academic procrastination; its Ethics Statement mentions procrastination only as a target of a separate follow-up study. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chen S. Chaiken S. (1999). “The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context,” in Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, eds Chaiken S. Trope Y. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 73– 96.
  2. Rost D. H. Schermer F. J. (2007). Differentielles Leistungsangst-Inventar [Differential Achievement Anxiety Inventory], 4th Edn. Frankfurt: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krispenz, A., & Dickhäuser, O.
Affiliations
University of Mannheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Krispenz, Ann
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-02-20
Volume
9
Pages
201-201
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788063798
Cited by
21
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
Universität Mannheim
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
test anxiety, cognitive appraisal, control-value theory of achievement emotions, distraction, coping strategies, university students, brief intervention, academic stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review