Cited by 431Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: An EEG study of distraction and reappraisal

Thiruchselvam, Ravi, Blechert, Jens, Sheppes, Gal, Rydstrom, Anders, Gross, James J.·2011·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Distraction and reappraisal are two widely used forms of emotion regulation. The process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 1998) holds that they differ (1) in when they act on the emotion-generative process, and (2) in their impact on subsequent responses to regulated stimuli. We tested these two predictions by measuring electrocortical responses to neutral and emotional images during two phases. In the regulation phase, images were watched or regulated using distraction or reappraisal. During the re-exposure phase, the same images were passively watched. As predicted, during regulation, distraction reduced the late positive potential (LPP) earlier than reappraisal. Upon re-exposure, images with a distraction (but not reappraisal) history elicited a larger LPP than images with an attend history. This pattern of results suggests that distraction and reappraisal intervene at separate stages during emotion generation, a feature which may have distinct consequences that extend beyond the regulatory episode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies showed decreased LPP amplitudes after suppression and after reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli.

    “Studies showed decreased LPP amplitudes after suppression (e.g., [35]) and after reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli (e.g., [36,37,38] but see [39,40]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

  • The present LPP results are in line with results from Krendl et al. and Grecucci, but contrary to the majority of earlier studies which showed a decreased LPP for reappraisal.

    “Our results are in line with results from Krendl et al. [39], or Grecucci [40], but contrary to the majority of earlier studies which showed a decreased LPP for reappraisal [36,37,66].”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiruchselvam, R., Blechert, J., Sheppes, G., Rydstrom, A., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Thiruchselvam, Ravi
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
84-92
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042906065
Cited by
431
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotion regulation, distraction, cognitive reappraisal, late positive potential, process model of emotion regulation, emotional pictures, re-exposure, temporal dynamics, electrocortical responses, attention
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Nonlinear Dynamics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review