CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imagining Others’ Minds: The Positive Relation Between Children’s Role Play and Anthropomorphism

Severson, Rachel L., Woodard, Shailee R.·2018·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02140PMC PMC6243028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02140

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Mean IDAQ-CF scores by role play type.
FIGURE 1 Mean IDAQ-CF scores by role play type.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Moderating effect of role play type on the curvilinear relation between anthropomorphism and frequency of role play.
FIGURE 2 Moderating effect of role play type on the curvilinear relation between anthropomorphism and frequency of role play.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Asquith, 1986, “Anthropomorphism and the Japanese and Western traditions in primatology,” in, Primate Ontogeny, Cognition, and Social Behavior, 61
  2. Astington, 1995, Theory of mind development and social understanding., Cognit. Emot., 9, 151, 10.1080/02699939508409006 · DOI
  3. Atherton, 2018, Seeing more than human: autism and anthropomorphic theory of mind., Front. Psychol., 9, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00528 · DOI
  4. Barrett, 2005, Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: a cross-cultural study., Evol. Hum. Behav., 26, 313, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.015 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barrett, 2003, Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s god concepts., Rev. Relig. Res., 44, 300, 10.2307/3512389 · DOI
  6. Bloom, 2007, Religion is natural., Dev. Sci., 10, 147, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x · DOI
  7. Boyer, 2001, Religion Explained.
  8. Carey, 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood.
  9. Carlson, 2010, “Development of conscious control and imagination,” in, Consciousness and Free Action: How they Could Work, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389760.003.0009 · DOI
  10. Carlson, 2005, Imaginary companions and impersonated characters: sex differences in children’s fantasy play., Merrill-Palmer Quart., 51, 93, 10.1353/mpq.2005.0003 · DOI
  11. Castelli, 2002, Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes., Brain, 125, 1839, 10.1093/brain/awf189 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Castelli, 2000, Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns., NeuroImage, 12, 314, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0612 · DOI
  13. Chin, 2005, Developing and anthropomorphic tendencies scale., Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 49, 1266, 10.1177/154193120504901311 · DOI
  14. Csibra, 1999, Goal attribution without agency cues: the ‘perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy., Cognition, 72, 237, 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00039-6 · DOI
  15. Dawson, 2014, Moderation in management research: what, why, when and how., J. Bus. Psychol., 29, 1, 10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7 · DOI
  16. Dore, 2015, How is theory of mind useful? Perhaps to enable social pretend play., Front. Psychol., 6, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01559 · DOI
  17. Epley, 2008, When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism., Soc. Cognit., 26, 143, 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Geerdts, 2015, Daily animal exposure and children’s biological concepts., J. Exp. Child Psychol., 130, 132, 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.001 · DOI
  19. Geerdts, 2016, (Un) real animals: anthropomorphism and early learning about animals., Child Dev. Perspect., 10, 10, 10.1111/cdep.12153 · DOI
  20. Gelman, 1981, “The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: implications for research on social cognition,” in, Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures, 43
  21. Gelman, 1983, “What preschoolers know about animate and inanimate objects,” in, The Development of Symbolic Though, 297
  22. Gelman, 2003, The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought., 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gelman, 1996, Children’s causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion., Child Dev., 67, 1970, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01838.x · DOI
  24. Gergely, 1995, Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age., Cognition, 56, 165, 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-H · DOI
  25. Ghuman, 2015, “Anthropomorphism and consumer brand relationships: a cross-cultural analysis,” in, Strong Brands, Strong Relationships, 135, 10.4324/9781315767079-21 · DOI
  26. Gleason, 2013, “Imaginary relationships,” in, The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination, 251
  27. Harris, 1992, From simulation to folk psychology: the case for development., Mind Lang., 7, 120, 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00201.x · DOI
  28. Harris, 2000, The Work of the Imagination.
  29. Herrmann, 2010, Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 9979, 10.1073/pnas.1004440107 · DOI
  30. Inagaki, 1990, The effects of raising animals on children’s biological knowledge., Br. J. Dev. Psychol., 8, 119, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.x · DOI
  31. Inagaki, 2006, Young children’s conception of the biological world., Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci., 15, 177, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00431.x · DOI
  32. Jipson, 2007, Robots and rodents: children’s inferences about living and nonliving kinds., Child Dev., 78, 1675, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x · DOI
  33. Johnson, 1998, Whose gaze will infants follow? Features that elicit gaze-following in 12-month-olds., Dev. Sci., 1, 233, 10.1111/1467-7687.00036 · DOI
  34. Kahn, 2006, Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children., Interact. Stud., 7, 405, 10.1075/is.7.3.13kah · DOI
  35. Kahn, 2012, “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot., Dev. Psychol., 48, 303, 10.1037/a0027033 · DOI
  36. Li, 2017, Do young Chinese children gain anthropomorphism after exposure to personified touch-screen and board games?, Front. Psychol., 8, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00055 · DOI
  37. Looser, 2010, The tipping point of animacy: how, when, and where we perceive life in a face., Psychol. Sci., 21, 1854, 10.1177/0956797610388044 · DOI
  38. Medin, 2010, Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children’s reasoning: culture and experience matter when reasoning about bio- logical entities., Cognit. Dev., 25, 197, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.02.001 · DOI
  39. Melson, 2009, Children’s behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs., J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., 30, 92, 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.011 · DOI
  40. Nagel, 1974, What is it like to be a bat?, Philos. Rev., 83, 435, 10.2307/2183914 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pearson, 2001, Prevalence of imaginary companions in a normal child population., Child Care Health Dev., 27, 13, 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00167.x · DOI
  42. Piaget, 1929, The Child’s Conception of the World.
  43. Severson, 2010, Behaving as or behaving as if? Children’s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category., Neural Netw. Special Issue Soc. Cognit., 23, 1099, 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014 · DOI
  44. Severson, 2016, Kids see human too: adapting an individual differences measure of anthropomorphism for a child sample., J. Cognit. Dev., 17, 122, 10.1080/15248372.2014.989445 · DOI
  45. Shahar, 2012, The personification of chronic physical illness: its role in adjustment and implications for psychotherapy integration., J. Psychother. Integrat., 23, 49, 10.1037/a0030272 · DOI
  46. Singer, 1981, Television, Imagination, and Aggression: A Study of Preschoolers.
  47. Springer, 1996, Nonverbal bases of social perception: developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events., J. Nonverb. Behav., 20, 199, 10.1007/BF02248673 · DOI
  48. Tahiroglu, 2012, Development and Correlates of Anthropomorphism (Order No. 3544921).
  49. Tahiroglu, 2011, Visual and auditory imagery associated with children’s imaginary companions., Imaginat. Cognit. Personality, 31, 99, 10.2190/IC.31.1-2.i · DOI
  50. Tarlowski, 2006, If it’s an animal it has axons: experience and culture in preschool children’s reasoning about animates., Cognit. Dev., 21, 249, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.02.001 · DOI
  51. Taylor, 1999, Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them., 10.1093/oso/9780195077049.001.0001 · DOI
  52. Taylor, 1997, The relation between individual differences in fantasy and Theory of Mind., Child Dev., 68, 436, 10.2307/1131670 · DOI
  53. Taylor, 2002, “Imaginary companions and elaborate fantasy in childhood: discontinuity with nonhuman animals,” in, Pretending and Imagination in Animals and Children, 167, 10.1017/CBO9780511542282.014 · DOI
  54. Taylor, 2004, The characteristics and correlates of fantasy in school-age children: imaginary companions, impersonation, and social understanding., Dev. Psychol., 40, 1173, 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1173 · DOI
  55. Taylor, 1993, A developmental investigation of children’s imaginary companions., Dev. Psychol., 29, 276, 10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.276 · DOI
  56. Waxman, 2007, Experience and cultural models matter: placing firm limits on childhood anthropocentrism., Hum. Dev., 50, 23, 10.1159/000097681 · DOI
  57. Waxman, 2014, Humans (really) are animals: picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban children’s construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals., Front. Psychol., 5, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172 · DOI
  58. Waytz, Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism., J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 99, 410, 10.1037/a0020240 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Waytz, 2013, “Imagining other minds: anthropomorphism is hair-triggered but not hair-brained,” in, The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination, 272, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195395761.013.0018 · DOI
  60. White, 2018, Object personification in autism: this paper will be very sad if you don’t read it., Autism, 10.1177/1362361318793408 · DOI
  61. Woolley, 2013, Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: children as naïve skeptics., Child Dev., 84, 1496, 10.1111/cdev.12081 · DOI
  62. Woolley, 1993, Origin and truth: young children’s understanding of imaginary mental representations., Child Dev., 64, 1, 10.2307/1131434 · DOI
  63. Zawieska, 2012, Understanding anthropomorphisation in social robotics., Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka, 16, 78

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Severson, R. L., & Woodard, S. R.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2018-11-13
Volume
9
ISSN
1664-1078
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02140
PMC
PMC6243028
Cited by
29
References
12
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review