Cited by 25Urban Green Space and HealthCOVID-19 and Mental HealthPhysical Activity and Health

The Importance of Nature Exposure and Physical Activity for Psychological Health and Stress Perception: Evidence From the First Lockdown Period During the Coronavirus Pandemic 2020 in France and Germany

Open access
Javelle, Florian, Laborde, Sylvain, Hosang, Thomas Jean, Metcalfe, Alan James, Zimmer, Philipp·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study aims to compare physical activity and nature exposure levels between people living in France and Germany during the lockdown. Furthermore, the secondary aim is to observe the relationship between perceived stress, psychological health, physical activity, and nature exposure in Germany and France during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related lockdown of April/May 2020. Methods: The study includes 419 participants who have completed the Perceived Stress Scale 10, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire, the modified Nature Exposure Scale, and complementary questions related to the lockdown period from April 19 to May 11, 2020. Multiple regression models were constructed to evaluate the relationship of nature exposure and physical exercise with overall stress perception and psychological health in France and Germany when considering a broad range of covariates. Results: Exposure to nature during the lockdown (ηp2 = 0.034, p < 0.001), amount of physical activity ηp2 = 0.014, p < 0.001), and psychological health (ηp2 = 0.041, p < 0.001) were greater in German compared with French participants. Godin Index and Nature Exposure Scale total score were both inversely correlated to stress perception and positively correlated to psychological health. The stress and psychological health regression models explained 10% of the results' variance. Physical activity (Godin Index) was a significant for both models. Nature Exposure Scale total score was a significant predictor only for psychological health. When including all significant covariates, the regression models explained 30.7% for the perceived stress and 42.1% for the psychological health total overall variance. Conclusion: Physical activity and nature exposure are significant predictors of psychological health. Even though both variables are associated with stress perception, only physical activity is a significant predictor of stress perception. Our results suggest that physical activity and nature exposure were key factors to go through the lockdown period in France and Germany.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623946

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In German and French populations between March and April 2020, physical activity and exposure to nature were significant predictors of psychological health.

    “A longitudinal study between March and April 2020 in German and French populations showed that PA and exposure to nature were significant predictors of psychological health (33).”

    From The Evolution of Psychological and Behavioral Consequences of Self-Isolation During Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study Across United Kingdom and Italy (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion reports that physical activity and nature exposure were significant predictors of psychological health in the German and French samples. But the Experimental Design describes a one-time online survey administered April 19–May 11, 2020, not a longitudinal study conducted between March and April. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cohen S. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States, in The Social Psychology of Health, eds Spacapan S. Oskamp S. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications), 31– 67. Available online at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-98838-002 (accessed June 10, 2020).
  2. Rolland J. (1991). French official version of the PSS-14. Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein, R. (1983). Author's personal communication. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310832011_French_official_version_of_the_PSS-14_Cohen_S_Kamarck_T_Mermelstein_R_1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Javelle, F., Laborde, S., Hosang, T. J., Metcalfe, A. J., & Zimmer, P.
Affiliations
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
Corresponding author
Javelle, Florian
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-03-04
Volume
12
Pages
623946-623946
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135097156
Cited by
25
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
nature exposure, physical activity, perceived stress, mental health, COVID-19 lockdown, leisure-time physical activity, cross-national comparison, France, Germany, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review