Cited by 16Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEmpathy and Medical EducationReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Mindfulness and compassion training for health professionals: A qualitative study

Open access
Brun, Clémence, Akinyemi, Alexis, Houtin, Laurène, Mizzi, Claire, Cardoso, Thierry, Isnard Bagnis, Corinne·2023·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background: Compassion is a key component of quality care. Encouraging Health Care Professionals (HCPs) to develop a patient-centered care relationship through mindfulness and compassion training may be beneficial for both patients and HCPs. Method: We assessed the impact of a compassion-centered mindfulness program [i.e., the Mindfulness Based (MB) CARE program] on healthcare practice conducting 10 phone interviews with HCPs who experienced the program. Results: The training had an overall positive impact on the HCPs ability to feel compassion toward their patients and themselves, helped them develop kindness toward themselves and their patients, and enhanced their attention to their patient’s needs and theirs. Participants were better able to accept the difficult work experiences or those their patients experienced, with more perceived equanimity and less reactivity. Conclusion: Professional mindfulness and compassion training programs could be operational levers for institutions aiming at fostering more compassionate HCPs–patients relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113453

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative studies have provided rich, contextualised accounts of shifts in self-relating, including the development of a more compassionate inner dialogue and increased capacity to respond to distress with warmth and understanding.

    “Findings have provided rich, contextualised accounts of shifts in self- relating, including the development of a more compassionate inner dialogue and increased capacity to respond to distress with warmth and understanding (Gilbert etal.2022; Maynard et al. 2022; Brun et al. 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Facione P. A. Crossetti M. Riegel F. (2017). Holistic Critical Thinking in the Nursing Diagnosis Process. Rev. Gaúcha Sick. 38: e75576. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.75576 29641771 · DOI
  2. Isnard B. C. (2019). “ Mindfulness in the field of healthcare relationships” in ICM 2019 – International conference on mindfulness – Asia pacific – CMC consciousness mindfulness compassion (Auckland University of Technology (AUT))

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brun, C., Akinyemi, A., Houtin, L., Mizzi, C., Cardoso, T., & Isnard Bagnis, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Laboratoire Parisien de Psychologie Sociale (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • Santé Publique France (FR)
Corresponding author
Brun, Clémence
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-01-12
Volume
13
Pages
1113453-1113453
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315640625
Cited by
16
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness training, compassion training, healthcare workers, compassionate care, patient-centered care, equanimity, self-kindness, physician-patient relationship, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review