Cited by 20Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The LIFEwithIBD intervention: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a face-to-face acceptance and commitment therapy and Compassion-Based intervention tailored to people with inflammatory bowel disease

Open access
Trindade, Inês A., Pereira, Joana, Galhardo, Ana, Ferreira, Nuno B., Lucena-Santos, Paola, Carvalho, Sérgio A., Oliveira, Sara, Skvarc, David +3 more·2021·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There is ample evidence of the high mental health burden caused by Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Several constructs such as experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, shame, and self-criticism have recently emerged as potential intervention targets to improve mental health in IBD. Psychotherapeutic models such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and compassion-based interventions are known to target these constructs. In this protocol, we aim to describe a two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of an ACT and compassion-focused intervention named Living with Intention, Fullness, and Engagement with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (LIFEwithIBD) intervention + Treatment As Usual (TAU) vs. TAU in improving psychological distress, quality of life, work and social functioning, IBD symptom perception, illness-related shame, psychological flexibility, self-compassion, disease activity, inflammation biomarkers, and gut microbiota diversity. Methods: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03840707, date assigned 13/02/2019). The LIFEwithIBD intervention is an adaptation to the IBD population of the Mind programme for people with cancer, an acceptance, mindfulness, and compassion-based intervention designed to be delivered in a group format. The LIFEwithIBD intervention's structure and topics are presented in this protocol. Participants were recruited at the Gastroenterology Service of the Coimbra University Hospital between June and September 2019. Of the 355 patients screened, 61 participants were selected, randomly assigned to one of two conditions [experimental group (LIFEwithIBD + TAU) or control group (TAU)] and completed the baseline assessment. Outcome measurement took place at baseline, post-intervention, 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Discussion: Results from this RCT will support future studies testing the LIFEwithIBD intervention or other acceptance and/or compassion-based interventions for IBD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.699367

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [74]Power M. Development of a common instrument for quality of life. In: Nosikov A Gudex C, editors. EUROHIS: Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys. Amsterdam: IOS Press (2003). p. 145– 63.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trindade, I. A., Pereira, J., Galhardo, A., Ferreira, N. B., Lucena-Santos, P., Carvalho, S. A., Oliveira, S., Skvarc, D., Rocha, B. S., Portela, F., & Ferreira, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Instituto Superior Miguel Torga (PT)
  • University of Nicosia (CY)
  • Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias (PT)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Trindade, Inês A.
  • Ferreira, Cláudia
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2021-08-19
Volume
12
Pages
699367-699367
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194492511
Cited by
20
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Estudo Geral (Universidad de Coimbra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, psychological distress, quality of life, self-compassion, psychological flexibility, experiential avoidance, gut microbiota, inflammatory markers, group therapy, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review