Cited by 7Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychology and Mental HealthMental Health and Psychiatry

Mental Pain Surrounding Suicidal Behaviour: A Review of What Has Been Described and Clinical Recommendations for Help

Open access
Morales, Susana, Barros, Jorge·2022·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a comprehensive review of scientific publications related to mental pain and suicide risk in order to deepen relevant aspects to guide clinical interventions. Method: Using a text analysis tool, we collected the terms most frequently linked with that situation in published results of research using various tools to evaluate mental pain or psychache. Discussion: We propose clinical interventions for the clinical conditions most commonly associated with mental pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.750651

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior reviews indicate the relevance of cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based strategies for psychological pain and identify psychological pain as both a state and trait phenomenon.

    “Overall, prior reviews [53,54,55,56,57] indicate the relevance of cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based strategies and identify psychological pain as both a state and trait phenomenon, supporting psychological pain as a meaningful intervention target.”

    From Targeting Psychological Pain After a Suicide Attempt: Scoping Review and Intervention Protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Results classify mental pain in suicidal behaviour into transient psychological states and relatively stable psychological traits. The Discussion recommends cognitive remediation, problem-solving and other cognitive techniques, but the searched passages do not identify mindfulness-based strategies. Thus this source supports the state–trait distinction and the relevance of cognitive strategies, not the mindfulness-based part. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Morales & Barros conducted a qualitative review identifying core psychological states and traits associated with suicidal psychological pain: transient states such as hopelessness, loneliness, and unbearable psychological suffering, and relatively stable traits including alexithymia, emotional dysregulation, and interpersonal difficulties.

    “Morales & Barros [57] conducted a qualitative review identifying core psychological states and traits associated with suicidal psychological pain. Their findings describe transient states such as hopelessness, loneliness, and unbearable psychological suffering, as well as relatively stable traits including alexithymia, emotional dysregulation, and interpersonal difficulties.”
  • Psychological pain domains-states and traits-are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention.

    “domains—states and traits—are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention, underscoring the centrality of psychological pain in suicide risk and the need for targeted interventions aimed at broadening emotional and behavioural coping repertoires.”
  • Both states and traits associated with suicidal psychological pain are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention.

    “The authors emphasise that both domains—states and traits—are clinically relevant and modifiable through psychotherapeutic intervention”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Joiner TE. Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2005).
  2. [33]Huber F. Promise Me You'll Shoot Yourself. The Donfall of Ordinary Germans in 1945. (Lane A. Ed.) (2019th ed.). great britain: Penguin Randoms House (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales, S., & Barros, J.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Barros, Jorge
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2022-01-27
Volume
12
Pages
750651-750651
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210692103
Cited by
7
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (ICS13_005)
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
psychological suffering, emotional pain, suicidal behavior, suicide risk, clinical intervention, psychological distress, clinical guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review