Cited by 372Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Neuropsychological dysfunction in depressed suicide attempters

Keilp, John G., Sackeim, Harold A., Brodsky, Beth S., Oquendo, Maria A., Malone, Kevin M., Mann, J. John·2001·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological deficits in the context of psychiatric disease may be associated with suicide risk. In this study, neuropsychological performance was compared among depressed patients with at least one prior suicide attempt of high lethality, depressed patients with low-lethality prior attempts, depressed patients with no prior suicide attempts, and nonpatients. METHOD: Fifty unmedicated patients in a major depressive episode (21 with no history of suicide attempts and 14 and 15 patients with previous attempts of low and high lethality, respectively) and 22 nonpatients were assessed. Groups were comparable in age, education, occupational level, and estimated premorbid intelligence. The neuropsychological battery produced scores within five composite domains: general intellectual functioning (current), motor functioning, attention, memory, and executive functioning. RESULTS: Patients whose prior suicide attempts were of high lethality performed significantly worse than all groups on tests of executive functioning and were the only group to perform significantly worse than nonpatients on tests of general intellectual functioning, attention, and memory. A discriminant function analysis revealed two prominent dimensions in the data: one that discriminated high-lethality suicide attempters from all other groups (primarily associated with performance on tests of executive functioning) and another that discriminated all depressed patient groups from nonpatients (associated with performance on measures of attention and memory). For the patients with high-lethality prior suicide attempts, deficits did not appear to reflect diffuse brain damage from past attempts, since the results of tests commonly affected by diffuse injury were not selectively impaired. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological deficits in depressed patients with high-lethality prior suicide attempts suggest impairment of executive functioning beyond that typically found in major depression. This more extensive neuropsychological impairment in the context of depression may be a risk factor for severe suicide attempts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.735

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keilp and colleagues found that adult suicide attempters performed poorly on frontal executive tasks relative to controls, similar to King and colleagues' observation in older adult attempters.

    “Keilp and colleagues found that adult suicide attempters performed poorly on frontal executive tasks relative to controls (33), a similar observation to one made by King and colleagues in older adult attempters (34).”

    From Suicide in older adults (2011) · cites this paper as [33]

  • Impaired cognitive control is the most consistent deficit found in suicide attempters.

    “These learning deficits scale with attempt lethality and are partially explained by impaired cognitive control (34), the most consistent deficit found in suicide attempters (17, 22, 24).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keilp, J. G., Sackeim, H. A., Brodsky, B. S., Oquendo, M. A., Malone, K. M., & Mann, J. J.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
158
Issue
5
Pages
735-741
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2097765762
Cited by
372
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH46745)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
neuropsychological deficits, major depressive disorder, suicide attempts, executive function, attention, memory, intellectual functioning, motor function, suicide risk, discriminant function analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Suicide, Attempted, Wechsler Scales, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review