Cited by 7Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health Research TopicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Network modeling of problematic social media use components in college student social media users

Open access
Chen, Jianyong, Su, Ting, Dong, Junqiang, Li, Yuzhi, Feng, Ju, Chen, Yingxiu, Liu, Gu·2025·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: While the constitutive features of problematic social media use (PSMU) have been formulated, there has been a lack of studies in the field examining the structure of relationships among PSMU components. Method: This study employed network analytic methods to investigate the connectivity among PSMU components in a large sample of 1,136 college student social media users (Mage = 19.69, SD = 1.60). Components of PSMU were assessed by the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) derived from a components model of addiction. We computed two types of network models, Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) to examine network structure and influential nodes and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify the probabilistic dependencies among components. Result: Relapse component consistently emerged as a central node in the GGMs and as a parent node of other components in the DAGs. Relapse and tolerance components exhibited strong mutual connections and were linked to the most vital edges within the networks. Additionally, conflict and mood modification nodes occupied more central positions within the PSMU network for the low-BSMAS-score subgroup compared with the high-BSMAS-score subgroup. Conclusion: Our findings shed new light on the complex architecture of PSMU and its potential implications for tailored interventions to relieve PSMU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1386845

Cites

70 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Su, T., Dong, J., Li, Y., Feng, J., Chen, Y., & Liu, G.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Jianyong
  • Dong, Junqiang
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2025-01-13
Volume
15
Pages
1386845-1386845
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406328700
Cited by
7
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Zhejiang Office of Philosophy and Social Science (20NDQN266YB)
  • Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
social media addiction, university students, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, relapse, tolerance, conflict, mood modification, network structure, directed acyclic graphs, Gaussian graphical models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review