Cited by 100Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersImpact of Light on Environment and Health

Bigger, brighter, bluer-better? Current light-emitting devices—Adverse sleep properties and preventative strategies

Open access
Gringras, Paul, Middleton, Benita, Skene, Debra J., Revell, Victoria L.·2015·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to enhance the efficiency, brightness, and contrast of light-emitting (LE) devices during the day, displays often generate substantial short-wavelength (blue-enriched) light emissions that can adversely affect sleep. We set out to verify the extent of such short-wavelength emissions, produced by a tablet (iPad Air), e-reader (Kindle Paperwhite 1st generation), and smartphone (iPhone 5s) and to determine the impact of strategies designed to reduce these light emissions. SETTING: University of Surrey dedicated chronobiology facility. METHODS: First, the spectral power of all the LE devices was assessed when displaying identical text. Second, we compared the text output with that of "Angry Birds" - a popular top 100 "App Store" game. Finally, we measured the impact of two strategies that attempt to reduce the output of short-wavelength light emissions. The first strategy employed an inexpensive commercially available pair of orange-tinted "blue-blocking" glasses. The second strategy tested an app designed to be "sleep-aware" whose designers deliberately attempted to reduce short-wavelength light emissions. RESULTS: All the LE devices shared very similar enhanced short-wavelength peaks when displaying text. This included the output from the backlit Kindle Paperwhite device. The spectra when comparing text to the Angry Birds game were also very similar, although the text emissions were higher intensity. Both the orange-tinted glasses and the "sleep-aware" app significantly reduced short-wavelength emissions. CONCLUSION: The LE devices tested were all bright and characterized by short-wavelength enriched emissions. Since this type of light is likely to cause the most disruption to sleep as it most effectively suppresses melatonin and increases alertness, there needs to be the recognition that at night-time "brighter and bluer" is not synonymous with "better." Ideally future software design could be better optimized when night-time use is anticipated, and hardware should allow an automatic "bedtime mode" that shifts blue and green light emissions to yellow and red as well as reduce backlight/light intensity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00233

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphones, laptops and e-books are equipped with LEDs that emit a considerable amount of short-wavelength light.

    “Smartphones, laptops and e-books are equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which emit a considerable amount of short-wavelength light (i.e., “blue light”) [3,4].”

    From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Materials and Methods table identifies LED lighting in the smartphone, tablet, and Kindle e-reader tested; the Results report enhanced short-wavelength blue peaks from all three. The paper does not report testing laptops or establish their emissions, so that part of the cited sentence is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gringras, P., Middleton, B., Skene, D. J., & Revell, V. L.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Gringras, Paul
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2015-10-13
Volume
3
Pages
233-233
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178370362
Cited by
100
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Keywords
blue emission, short-wavelength light, light-emitting devices, sleep disruption, melatonin suppression, smartphone screens, tablet display, e-readers, display brightness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review