Cited by 237Sleep and related disordersChild Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Sleep duration, restfulness, and screens in the sleep environment

Open access
Falbe, Jennifer, Davison, Kirsten K., Franckle, Rebecca L., Ganter, Claudia, Gortmaker, Steven L., Smith, Lauren, Land, Thomas, Taveras, Elsie M.·2015·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Associations of inadequate sleep with numerous health outcomes among youth necessitate identifying its modifiable determinants. Television (TV) has been associated with sleep curtailment, but little is known about small screens (eg, smartphones), which can be used in bed and emit notifications. Therefore, we examined associations of different screens in sleep environments with sleep duration and perceived insufficient rest or sleep. METHODS: Participants included 2048 fourth- and seventh-graders participating in the Massachusetts Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Study in 2012 to 2013. Using linear and log binomial regression, we examined cross-sectional associations of small screens and TVs in sleep environments and screen time with weekday sleep duration and perceived insufficient rest or sleep in the past week. RESULTS: Children who slept near a small screen (compared with never) reported 20.6 fewer minutes of sleep (95% confidence interval [CI], -29.7 to -11.4) and had a higher prevalence of perceived insufficient rest or sleep (prevalence ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.60). Children who slept in a room with a TV (compared with no TV) reported 18.0 fewer minutes of sleep (95% CI, -27.9 to -8.1). TV or DVD viewing and video or computer game playing were associated with both sleep outcomes (P < .01). Some associations were stronger among Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and older children (P < .05 for heterogeneity). CONCLUSIONS: Sleeping near a small screen, sleeping with a TV in the room, and more screen time were associated with shorter sleep durations. Presence of a small screen, but not a TV, in the sleep environment and screen time were associated with perceived insufficient rest or sleep. These findings caution against unrestricted screen access in children's bedrooms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2014-2306

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 58% of the participants experienced poor sleep quality.

    “The results of this study indicated that 58% of the participants experienced poor sleep quality, which is higher than the 40% reported in a previous study (51).”

    From Relationship of screen time with anxiety, depression, and sleep quality among adolescents: a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

    The citation is attached to the previous study’s purported 40% figure; the 58% figure is the citing authors’ own result. Falbe’s Table 1 reports perceived insufficient rest or sleep in 32.8% of fourth-graders and 22.6% of seventh-graders, but does not report that 40% experienced poor sleep quality. Searches for the 40% figure and poor sleep quality found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falbe, J., Davison, K. K., Franckle, R. L., Ganter, C., Gortmaker, S. L., Smith, L., Land, T., & Taveras, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Departments of Nutrition and
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Institute for Children’s Health Quality (US)
  • Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Falbe, Jennifer
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2015-02-01
Volume
135
Issue
2
Pages
e367-e375
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2167535168
Cited by
237
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
35.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (#14POST20140055)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U18DP003370)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK007703., T32DK007703)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U18DP003370)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
sleep duration, sleep environment, small displays, smartphones, television viewing, screen time, children, adolescents, Hispanic children, non-Hispanic Black children
MeSH terms
Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Motor Activity, Rest, Risk Factors, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Social Environment, Television, Videodisc Recording, Video Games, Cell Phone, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review