Cited by 99Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Adolescents' Use of Digital Technologies and Preferences for Mobile Health Coaching in Public Mental Health Settings

Open access
Aschbrenner, Kelly A., Naslund, John A., Tomlinson, Elizabeth F., Kinney, Allison, Pratt, Sarah I., Brunette, Mary F.·2019·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Objective: Youth with mental illnesses often engage in unhealthy behaviors associated with early mortality from physical diseases in adulthood, but interventions to support positive health behaviors are rarely offered as part of routine mental health care for this group. Digital health technology that is desirable, accessible and affordable has the potential to address health behaviors in public mental health settings where many adolescents with severe mental health problems receive care. The aims of this study were to examine how adolescents receiving public mental health services use digital technology and social media and to explore their preferences using technology to support health and wellness. Methods: Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, we surveyed adolescents ages 13-18 from four community mental health centers in one state and conducted focus group interviews to explore their perspectives on using digital technology and social media to receive health coaching and connect with peers to support healthy behaviors. The survey and focus group data were merged to inform the future development of a digital health intervention for adolescents receiving public mental health services. Results: Of 121 survey respondents (mean age 15.2, SD = 1.5), 92% had a cell phone, 79% had a smartphone, 90% used text messaging, and 98% used social media. Focus group interviews revealed that adolescents were interested in receiving strengths-based mobile health coaching, and they preferred structured online peer-to-peer interactions in which a professional moderator promotes positive connections and adherence to privacy guidelines. Conclusions: Adolescents receiving public mental health services in this study had access to smartphones and were frequent social media users. These data suggest that digital health interventions to promote health and wellness among adolescents may be scalable in community mental health settings. Adolescent participants suggested that digital health interventions for this group should focus on strengths and online peer support for health promotion should include a professional moderator to foster and manage peer-to-peer interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00178

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a sample of adolescents ages 13-18 recruited from community mental health centers, 98% reported using social media, with YouTube as the most popular platform, followed by Instagram and Snapchat.

    “Similarly, in a sample of adolescents ages 13-18 recruited from community mental health centers, 98% reported using social media, with YouTube as the most popular platform, followed by Instagram and Snapchat (Aschbrenner et al., 2019).”
  • Interpretation of physical metrics is often oversimplified, leading to stigma and discrimination against those outside perceived normal ranges.

    “While these metrics can provide valuable insights into general health status, their interpretation is often oversimplified, leading to stigma and discrimination against those who fall outside the perceived “normal” ranges.”

    From Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Introduction discusses physical health risks, and the Discussion mentions stigma associated with mental illness and online peer support. Neither addresses oversimplified interpretation of physical metrics or discrimination against people outside perceived normal ranges. Searches for those terms and for weight- or BMI-related stigma found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stigma based on physical measurements affects societal perceptions and individuals' self-views, potentially leading to anxiety, depression, and eating disorders.

    “This stigma not only affects societal perceptions of individuals based on their physical measurements but also influences how individuals view themselves, potentially leading to a host of negative mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, and eating disorders [65].”

    From Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Discussion discusses stigma associated with mental illness and the potential for online peer support to reduce it. The Introduction mentions obesity among people with serious mental illness, but neither section links stigma based on physical measurements to self-perception, anxiety, depression, or eating disorders (searched: body image and weight stigma). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aschbrenner, K. A., Naslund, J. A., Tomlinson, E. F., Kinney, A., Pratt, S. I., & Brunette, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Aschbrenner, Kelly A.
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2019-07-02
Volume
7
Pages
178-178
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953658022
Cited by
99
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hitchcock Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
adolescents, digital health technologies, strengths-based coaching, social media use, smartphone use, public mental health services, community mental health centers, peer support, health promotion, health behavior, youth mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review