Cited by 22Diabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Efficacy of telemedicine intervention in the self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Liu, Fengzhao, Li, Jixin, Li, Xiangyu, Yang, Zhenyu, Wang, Wenru, Zhao, Lijuan, Wu, Tao, Huang, Chengcheng +1 more·2024·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to report the latest and largest pooled analyses and evidence updates to assess the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for self-management (DSM) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science in December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults (≥18 years of age) diagnosed with T2DM where the intervention was the application of telemedicine. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment was used to evaluate quality. The study’s main outcome indicators were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and diabetes self-management (DSM) capacity. Results: A total of 17 eligible articles, comprising 20 studies and 1,456 patients (734 in the intervention group and 722 in the control group), were included in the evidence synthesis. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar in all outcomes. Comprehensive analyses showed post-intervention decreases in HbA1c, 2-h postprandial glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, increases in Diabetes Self- Care activities, DSM competencies based on dietary and medication adherence, and improvements in overall DSM scores, all of which were statistically significant. While no statistically significant differences were observed in body mass index, lipids, and other DSM dimensions. Based on subgroup analyses, app-based experimental interventions targeting under 60 years old populations in Asia and North America were found to be more effective and less heterogeneity in the short term (<6 months of intervention). Conclusion: Telemedicine interventions may assist patients with T2DM in enhancing their DSM and improving their HbA1c levels. Clinician can use various telemedicine interventions to enhance DSM in T2DM patients, considering local circumstances. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42024508522.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1405770

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Telemedicine supported by mHealth seemed to be more frequently associated with improved glycaemic control, whilst past evidence did not consistently demonstrate a clear benefit of telemedicine on metabolic control.

    “In these cases, telemedicine supported by mHealth seemed to be more frequently associated with improved glycaemic control, whilst past evidence did not consistently demonstrate a clear benefit of telemedicine on metabolic control (7–9).”

    From Impact of digital health on Type 2 diabetes management: a randomised controlled trial of the ‘TreC Diabete’ platform (TELEMECHRON Study) (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports significant HbA1c reductions with app, app-plus-telephone, and telephone interventions, supporting the association with improved glycaemic control. It does not characterize past evidence as lacking a consistent benefit: it says its blood-glucose findings are consistent with previous systematic reviews. Its own analysis found no relevant effect on fasting plasma glucose, but that does not establish the claim about past evidence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The clinical effectiveness of mHealth tools, including those delivered via telemedicine platforms, remains inconsistent, with some studies showing limited or variable impact on metabolic outcomes.

    “However, the clinical effectiveness of mHealth tools, including those delivered via telemedicine platforms, remains inconsistent, with some studies showing limited or variable impact on metabolic, and in the large majority of cases studies were assessing a single-function application.”

    From Impact of digital health on Type 2 diabetes management: a randomised controlled trial of the ‘TreC Diabete’ platform (TELEMECHRON Study) (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion reports mixed metabolic results in patients with type 2 diabetes: telemedicine improved HbA1c and several other measures, but showed no relevant effect on fasting glucose or BMI, and weight and blood-pressure results were unstable. This supports variable effects in the studied population, not a general conclusion that mHealth tools are clinically inconsistent. The Descriptions of studies section also does not support the citing sentence’s assertion that a large majority assessed single-function applications. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A 2024 meta-analysis by Liu et al., incorporating 1,456 patients, confirmed that telemedicine significantly enhanced self-management and lowered blood glucose levels in T2DM patients.

    “Furthermore, a 2024 meta-analysis from Liu and colleagues, incorporating data from 1,456 patients and different telemedicine solutions, confirmed that telemedicine significantly enhanced self-management and lowered blood glucose levels in T2DM patients (7).”
  • Subgroup analyses revealed greatest efficacy in younger patients, interventions under six months, and the use of apps and telephones.

    “Subgroup analyses revealed the greatest efficacy in younger patients, interventions under six months, and the use of apps and telephones.”
  • In that meta-analysis, improvements were seen in HbA1c, two-hours post-prandial glucose, weight, SBP, and DBP, but not on BMI and Fasting Plasma Glucose.

    “Key improvements were also seen in HbA1c, two-hours post-prandial glucose, weight, SBP, and DBP, but not on BMI and Fasting Plasma Glucose.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, F., Li, J., Li, X., Yang, Z., Wang, W., Zhao, L., Wu, T., Huang, C., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Xiyuan Hospital (CN)
  • Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Yunsheng
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-05-21
Volume
12
Pages
1405770-1405770
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398174580
Cited by
22
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3606200, 2018YFC1704103)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, blood pressure, medication adherence, dietary adherence, mobile health apps, diabetes self-care
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review