Cited by 57Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

Effect of telemedicine intervention on hypoglycaemia in diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Hu, Yuli, Wen, Xiaohong, Wang, Feifei, Yang, Dongliang, Liu, Shanshan, Li, Pan, Xu, Juling·2019·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Introduction: Hypoglycaemia is a clinical syndrome from various causes, which happens when the blood glucose concentration is too low. Many studies show that telemedicine intervention can improve glycemic control and has a positive impact on the management of diabetic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of telemedicine intervention on hypoglycemic event occurrences and results on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, the EBSCO host, and OVID to identify relevant studies published from January 2006 to December 2017. The work of searching, selecting and assessing risk of bias was administrated by two independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were hypoglycemic event rate and HbA1c; the secondary outcome was BMI. Results: From 1246 articles, we identified 14 eligible RCTs ( n = 1324). Compared to usual care, telemedicine was found to reduce the odds of hypoglycaemia (odds ratio ( OR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval ( CI) = 0.29–0.59; I 2 = 32%; p < 0.00001). We found that the clinical relevance declined in HbA1c level compared to control group (mean difference = −0.28; 95% CI = −0.45 to −0.12; I 2 = 53%; p = 0.0005), but that telemedicine had no effect on BMI (mean difference = −0.27; 95% CI = −0.86–0.31; I 2 = 40%; p = 0.35). Discussion: Compared to usual care, the use of telemedicine was found to improve HbA1c and reduce the risk of moderate hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients, but without significant difference in BMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x18776823

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Y., Wen, X., Wang, F., Yang, D., Liu, S., Li, P., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Huzhou Normal University (CN)
  • The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, China
  • Cangzhou Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Juling
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2018-06-18
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
402-413
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2809115223
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Establishment and Application of Blood Glucose Management Platform after Diabetes Discharge; Regional Joint Management of Blood glucose in patients with Off-hospital Diabetes Mellitus (2016 c33217; 2016 GYB02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
telemedicine, hypoglycemia, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, HbA1c, body mass index, telehealth intervention, blood glucose monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review