Cited by 626Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Artificial Intelligence Transforms the Future of Health Care

Open access
Noorbakhsh-Sabet, Nariman, Zand, Ramin, Zhang, Yanfei, Abedi, Vida·2019·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Life sciences researchers using artificial intelligence (AI) are under pressure to innovate faster than ever. Large, multilevel, and integrated data sets offer the promise of unlocking novel insights and accelerating breakthroughs. Although more data are available than ever, only a fraction is being curated, integrated, understood, and analyzed. AI focuses on how computers learn from data and mimic human thought processes. AI increases learning capacity and provides decision support system at scales that are transforming the future of health care. This article is a review of applications for machine learning in health care with a focus on clinical, translational, and public health applications with an overview of the important role of privacy, data sharing, and genetic information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.017

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning algorithms analyze extensive clinical data and identify underlying patterns and trends, offering robust support for disease prediction and risk assessment.

    “ML algorithms, which analyze extensive clinical data and identify underlying patterns and trends, offer robust support for disease prediction and risk assessment [8, 9].”
  • If patients are well informed about the way their information will be collected and used during medical treatments, they will be able to decide their preferences regarding privacy protection.

    “If patients are well informed about the way their information will be collected and used during their medical treatments, they will be able to decide their preferences regarding the privacy protection (Noorbakhsh-Sabet et al., 2019).”

    From Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda (2023) · cites this paper as Noorbakhsh-Sabet et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Bogle Brittany; Balduino Ricardo; Wolk Donna M.; Farag Hosam A; Kethireddy Shravan; Chatterjee Avijit; Abedi V. Predicting Mortality of Sepsis Patients in a Multi-Site Healthcare System using Supervised Machine Learning in Int’l Conf. of Health Informatics and Medical Systems 9– 15 (2018). https://csce.ucmss.com/cr/books/2018/LFS/CSREA2018/HIM3645.pdf
  2. [27]Abedi V, Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Hosseinichimeh N, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J, Elijovich L, Metter JE, Alexandrov AW, Liebeskind DS, Alexandrov AV, Z. R Novel Screening Tool for Stroke Using Artificial Neural Network. J. Stroke 48, 1678– 1681 (2017). 28438906
  3. [41]Lu Pinyi, Bevan David R., Leber Andrew, Hontecillas Raquel, Nuria Tubau-Juni, B.-R. J in Accelerated Path to Cures (ed. Bassaganya-Riera J) 7– 24 (Springer, 2018).
  4. [57]Chen X, Member S & Lin X Big data deep learning: challenges and perspectives 2, (2014). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.201.2325029 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noorbakhsh-Sabet, N., Zand, R., Zhang, Y., & Abedi, V.
Affiliations
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Geisinger Medical Center (US)
  • Geisinger Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Abedi, Vida
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
132
Issue
7
Pages
795-801
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915053252
Cited by
626
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 10
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R56HL116832)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, machine learning applications, clinical application, translational research, decision support system, data privacy, data sharing, genetic information
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Forecasting, Humans, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review