Cited by 112Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Microbiome Analysis and Probiotic Interventions—An Overview and Perspective Based on the Current State of the Art

Open access
D’Urso, Fabiana, Broccolo, Francesco·2024·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health and influencing disease states. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have opened new avenues for exploring the intricate functionalities of the gut microbiota. This article aims to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art applications of AI in microbiome analysis, with examples related to metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and genomics. It also offers a perspective on the use of such AI solutions in probiotic interventions for various clinical settings. This comprehensive understanding can lead to the development of targeted therapies that modulate the gut microbiota to improve health outcomes. This article explores the innovative application of AI in understanding the complex interactions within the gut microbiota. By leveraging AI, researchers aim to uncover the microbiota’s role in human health and disease, particularly focusing on CIDs and probiotic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app14198627

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomic risk screening can be accelerated using AI algorithms such as DeepMicro, CARD, ResFinder, and machine-learning models identifying specific tRNAs that distinguish safe probiotics from dangerous intestinal pathogens.

    “Thus, genomic risk screening can be accelerated through rapid identification using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms (in particular, DeepMicro, which analyzes sequencing data at high speed to identify bacterial species and potential pathogens with greater speed and accuracy than cultivation-based methods); identification of ARG and virulence detection (for example, using a big data platform”

    From Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy (2026) · cites this paper as [166]

    Section 2.1 says AI enables rapid, culture-free microbial identification and describes DeepMicro identifying bacterial species and pathogens from metagenomic data. Section 4 says AI-driven genomic analysis can identify genes associated with antibiotic resistance. Our copy does not support the specific examples CARD or ResFinder, or the claim that models identify tRNAs distinguishing safe probiotics from intestinal pathogens (searched those terms); no page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Artificial Intelligence in Microbiome Research: Opportunities and Challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 527458.
  2. Fioravanti, A.; Fustaino, V.; Orsini, M.; Corsi, C.; Arrigo, P.; Patarnello, T.; Carbonneau, M.A.; Mauri, M.; Biondi, E.G. Phylogenetic convolutional neural networks in metagenomics. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 49. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Zhu, Q.; Pan, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, S.; Wei, H.; Huang, Y.; et al. MicrobioGraph: A Graph Neural Network-Based Framework for Inferring Microbial Interactions from Metagenomic Data. bioRxiv 2021. bioRxiv:2021.02.11.430831.
  4. Sabico, S.; Al-Mashharawi, A.; Al-Daghri, N.M.; Yakout, S.; Alnaami, A.M.; Alokail, M.S.; McTernan, P.G. Effects of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 12 weeks in circulating endotoxin levels and cardiometabolic profiles of medication naïve T2DM patients: A randomized clinical trial. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 286. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Franzosa, E.A.; McIver, L.J.; Rahnavard, G.; Thompson, L.R.; Schirmer, M.; Weingart, G.; Lipson, K.S.; Knight, R.; Caporaso, J.G.; Segata, N.; et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 962-968.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D’Urso, F., & Broccolo, F.
Affiliations
University of Salento (IT)
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-25
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
8627
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402824349
Cited by
112
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 53
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
artificial intelligence, gut microbiota, microbiome analysis, probiotic intervention, metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, genomics, targeted therapy, chronic inflammatory diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review