The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes from a Circular Economy Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently one of the most important electrochemical energy storage devices, powering electronic mobile devices and electric vehicles alike. However, there is a remarkable difference between their rate of production and rate of recycling. At the end of their lifecycle, only a limited number of LIBs undergo any recycling treatment, with the majority go to landfills or being hoarded in households. Further losses of LIB components occur because the the state-of-the-art LIB recycling processes are limited to components with high economic value, e.g., Co, Cu, Fe, and Al. With the increasing popularity of concepts such as “circular economy” (CE), new LIB recycling systems have been proposed that target a wider spectrum of compounds, thus reducing the environmental impact associated with LIB production. This review work presents a discussion of the current practices and some of the most promising emerging technologies for recycling LIBs. While other authoritative reviews have focused on the description of recycling processes, the aim of the present was is to offer an analysis of recycling technologies from a CE perspective. Consequently, the discussion is based on the ability of each technology to recover every component in LIBs. The gathered data depicted a direct relationship between process complexity and the variety and usability of the recovered fractions. Indeed, only processes employing a combination of mechanical processing, and hydro- and pyrometallurgical steps seemed able to obtain materials suitable for LIB (re)manufacture. On the other hand, processes relying on pyrometallurgical steps are robust, but only capable of recovering metallic components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
The development and future of lithium ion batteries
Blomgren, G. E. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0251701jes · Cited by 1,940
Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau‐Bettez, G., & Strømman, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x · Cited by 1,670
Meshram, P., Pandey, B. D., & Mankhand, T. R. (2014) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.10.012 · Cited by 982
Lithium market research – global supply, future demand and price development
Martin, G., Rentsch, L., Höck, M., & Bertau, M. (2017) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2016.11.004 · Cited by 740 · cited 4×
“The Li2CO3 obtained in the Accurec and Battery Resources recoveries can also be used during Al production as an electrolyte additive [117].”
BackgroundInfluentialLife cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665
Dunn, J. B., Gaines, L., Kelly, J. C., James, C., & Gallagher, K. G. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03029j · Cited by 561
Lithium battery reusing and recycling: A circular economy insight
Pagliaro, M., & Meneguzzo, F. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01866 · Cited by 321
Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis
Kim, H. C., Wallington, T. J., Arsenault, R., Bae, C., Ahn, S., & Lee, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00830 · Cited by 312
Zhang, T., He, Y., Wang, F., Ge, L., Zhu, X., & Li, H. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.002 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling─Overview of Techniques and Trends
Baum, Z. J., Bird, R. E., Yu, X., & Ma, J. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602 · Cited by 747
The significance of biomass in a circular economy
Sherwood, J. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122755 · Cited by 517
Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?
Lombardo, T., Duquesnoy, M., El-Bouysidy, H., Årén, F., Gallo-Bueno, A., Jørgensen, P. B., Bhowmik, A., Demortière, A., Ayerbe, E., Alcaide, F., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 · Cited by 503
Martins, L. S., Guimarães, L. F., Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113091 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Velázquez-Martínez, O., Valio, J., Santasalo-Aarnio, A., Reuter, M., & Serna-Guerrero, R.
- Venue
- Batteries
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-11-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 68
- ISSN
- 2313-0105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2988125793
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes from a Circular Economy Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/batteries5040068
- The paper
- Velázquez-Martínez, O., Valio, J., Santasalo-Aarnio, A., Reuter, M., & Serna-Guerrero, R. (2019). A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Processes from a Circular Economy Perspective. Batteries. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5040068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.