Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Blood biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia: Review and meta-analysis

Open access
Ntymenou, Sofia, Tsantzali, Ioanna, Kalamatianos, Theodosis, Voumvourakis, Konstantinos I., Kapaki, Elisabeth, Tsivgoulis, Georgios, Stranjalis, George, Paraskevas, George P.·2021·Brain Sciences

Abstract

Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are useful in the differential diagnosis between frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), but require lumbar puncture, which is a moderately invasive procedure that can cause anxiety to patients. Gradually, the measurement of blood biomarkers has been attracting great interest. Testing blood instead of CSF, in order to measure biomarkers, offers numerous advantages because it negates the need for lumbar puncture, it is widely available, and can be repeated, allowing the prediction of disease course. In this study, a systematic review of the existing literature was conducted, as well as meta-analysis with greater emphasis on the most studied biomarkers, p-tau and progranulin. The goal was to give prominence to evidence regarding the use of plasma biomarkers in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci11020244

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program] Version 5.4.1 The Cochrane Collaboration London, UK 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ntymenou, S., Tsantzali, I., Kalamatianos, T., Voumvourakis, K. I., Kapaki, E., Tsivgoulis, G., Stranjalis, G., & Paraskevas, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Evangelismos Hospital (GR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
Corresponding author
Ntymenou, Sofia
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
244
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132159514
Cited by
31
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
frontotemporal dementia, blood biomarkers, plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau, progranulin, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, Alzheimer's disease differential diagnosis, disease progression prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review