Cited by 21Action Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Threat Detection in Nearby Space Mobilizes Human Ventral Premotor Cortex, Intraparietal Sulcus, and Amygdala

Open access
de Borst, Aline W., de Gelder, Beatrice·2022·Brain Sciences

Abstract

In the monkey brain, the precentral gyrus and ventral intraparietal area are two interconnected brain regions that form a system for detecting and responding to events in nearby “peripersonal” space (PPS), with threat detection as one of its major functions. Behavioral studies point toward a similar defensive function of PPS in humans. Here, our aim was to find support for this hypothesis by investigating if homolog regions in the human brain respond more strongly to approaching threatening stimuli. During fMRI scanning, naturalistic social stimuli were presented in a 3D virtual environment. Our results showed that the ventral premotor cortex and intraparietal sulcus responded more strongly to threatening stimuli entering PPS. Moreover, we found evidence for the involvement of the amygdala and anterior insula in processing threats. We propose that the defensive function of PPS may be supported by a subcortical circuit that sends information about the relevance of the stimulus to the premotor cortex and intraparietal sulcus, where action preparation is facilitated when necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci12030391

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anterior insular cortex has been implied in peripersonal space representation.

    “has been implied in PPS representation (Lloyd et al. 2006; de Borst and de Gelder 2022).”

    From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as de Borst and de Gelder 2022

    The Discussion (section 4.1) reports that the anterior insula responds more strongly to threatening stimuli in peripersonal space and has been suggested to support judgments about when approaching objects will collide. That implicates it in processing events in that space, but the Introduction and Discussion identify the ventral premotor cortex and intraparietal sulcus—not the anterior insula—as the regions encoding peripersonal space. The source therefore does not establish anterior-insula involvement in its representation specifically. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • fMRI studies have demonstrated anterior cingulate cortex activation when subjects are exposed to looming threatening stimuli such as virtual predators, tarantulas, or threatening avatars.

    “In line with this hypothesis, fMRI studies have demonstrated ACC activation when subjects are exposed to looming threatening stimuli, such as virtual predators, tarantulas, or threatening avatars (Mobbs et al. 2007, 2010; Vieira et al. 2020; de Borst and de Gelder 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Talairach J. Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Medical Cerebral Imaging Thieme New York, NY, USA 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Borst, A. W., & de Gelder, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement, Hamburg University, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
  • Brain and Emotion Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 EV Maastricht, The Netherlands
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-15
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
391
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221026798
Cited by
21
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Union (824160, 825079)
  • European Research Council (295673)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
peripersonal space, threat detection, ventral premotor cortex, intraparietal sulcus, amygdala, anterior insula, defensive behavior, action preparation, threat processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review