Cited by 33Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Early Breast Cancer Patients: High CD3+, CD8+, and Immunoscore Are Associated with a Pathological Complete Response

Open access
Rapoport, Bernardo Leon, Nayler, Simon, Mlecnik, Bernhard, Smit, Teresa, Heyman, Liezl, Bouquet, Isabelle, Martel, Marine, Galon, Jérôme +2 more·2022·Cancers

Abstract

Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with a better prognosis in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). These cells can be enumerated in situ by the “Immunoscore Clinical Research” (ISCR). The original Immunoscore® is a prognostic tool that categorizes the densities of CD3+ and CD8+ cells in both the invasive margin (IM) and center of the tumor (CT) in localized colon cancer, yielding a five-tiered classification (0–4). We evaluated the prognostic potential of ISCR and pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: The cohort included 53 TNBC, 32 luminal BC, and 18 HER2-positive BC patients undergoing NACT. Pre-treatment tumor biopsies were immune-stained for CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell markers. Quantitative analysis of these cells in different tumor locations was performed using computer-assisted image analysis. Results: The pCR rate was 44%. Univariate analysis showed that primary tumor size, estrogen-receptor negative, progesterone-receptor negative, luminal vs. HER2-positive vs. TNBC, high Ki-67, high densities (cells/mm2) of CD3 CT, CD8+ CT, CD3+ IM, and CD8+ IM cells were associated with a high pCR. ISCR was associated with pCR following NACT. A multivariate model consisting of ISCR and the significant variables from the univariate analysis showed a significant trend for ISCR; however, the low sample size did not provide enough power for the model to be included in this study. Conclusions: These results revealed a significant prognostic role for the spatial distributions of the CD3+, and CD8+ lymphocytes, as well as the ISCR in relation to pCR following NACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers14102525

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results on the histological class pairs associated with pCR and RD are in line with previously published studies.

    “These results are in line with previously published studies [58–66].”

    From Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    Results §3.6 reports that two pairs of breast-cancer molecular subtypes—luminal versus HER2-positive and TNBC versus HER2-positive—differed significantly in their association with pCR. This supports the broad claim that prior work found class-pair differences in response, but the paper does not report the citing study’s histological class pairs or a separate analysis of residual disease (RD). (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapoport, B. L., Nayler, S., Mlecnik, B., Smit, T., Heyman, L., Bouquet, I., Martel, M., Galon, J., Benn, C.-A., & Anderson, R.
Affiliations
  • Milpark Hospital (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Inovarion (France) (FR)
  • The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank (ZA)
  • Veracyte, Luminy Biotech Entreprises, 13009 Marseille, France
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Rapoport, Bernardo Leon
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-20
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
2525
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280617720
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, early breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, immune score, CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, pathological complete response, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prognostic factors, invasive margin, luminal breast cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review