Cited by 89Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

Pain neuroscience education: state of the art and application in pediatrics

Open access
Robins, Hannah, Perron, Victoria, Heathcote, Lauren, Simons, Laura·2016·Children

Abstract

Chronic pain is a widespread problem in the field of pediatrics. Many interventions to ameliorate pain-related dysfunction have a biobehavioral focus. As treatments for chronic pain (e.g., increased movement) often stand in stark contrast to treatments for an acute injury (e.g., rest), providing a solid rationale for treatment is necessary to gain patient and parent buy-in. Most pain treatment interventions incorporate psychoeducation, or pain neuroscience education (PNE), as an essential component, and in some cases, as a stand-alone approach. The current topical review focuses on the state of pain neuroscience education and its application to pediatric chronic pain. As very little research has examined pain neuroscience education in pediatrics, we aim to describe this emerging area and catalyze further work on this important topic. As the present literature has generally focused on adults with chronic pain, pain neuroscience education merits further attention in the realm of pediatric pain in order to be tailored and implemented in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/children3040043

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Kenshalo D.R. Florida State University The Skin Senses; Proceedings Thomas Springfield, IL, USA 1968
  2. [59]Moseley G.L. Painful Yarns: Metaphors and Stories to Help Understand the Biology of Pain Dancing Giraffe Press Minneapolis, MN, USA 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robins, H., Perron, V., Heathcote, L., & Simons, L.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Simons, Laura
Venue
Children
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
43
ISSN
2227-9067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561211467
Cited by
89
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
NICHD (HD083270)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain neuroscience education, pediatric chronic pain, psychoeducation, pain management, biobehavioral interventions, treatment rationale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review