Cited by 146Environmental Sustainability in BusinessOrganic Food and AgricultureConsumer behavior in food and health

Explaining Chinese Consumers’ Green Food Purchase Intentions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour

Open access
Qi, Xin, Ploeger, Angelika·2021·Foods

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has strongly influenced consumers’ habits and behaviours, creating a more sustainable and healthier era of consumption. Hence, there is a potential for further expanding the green food sector in China. The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) is one widely used framework to explain consumers’ food choices. Considering consumers’ internal norms, their perceptions of green food attributes, and the shifting consumer behaviour, our study has extended the TPB framework (E-TPB) by adding constructs of moral attitude, health consciousness, and the impact of COVID-19 (IOC). The results of structural equation modelling among 360 functional samples revealed that the E-TPB model has a superior explanatory and predictive power, compared with the original TPB model regarding Chinese consumers’ green food buying intentions in the current and post-pandemic periods. The path analysis demonstrated that attitude, perceived behavioural control, moral attitude, health consciousness, and IOC have significant positive effects on green food purchase intentions. However, the association between subjective norm and purchase intention varies within the TPB and E-TPB models, which showed a non-significant impact in E-TPB. These findings can generate more suitable managerial implications to promote green food consumption in China during the current and post-pandemic periods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/foods10061200

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health consciousness directly affects purchase intention and operates through various psychological and social mechanisms.

    “This psychological factor directly affects the purchase intention and operates through various psychological and social mechanisms [2,43,66].”

    From Psychological Determinants of Healthy Food Purchase Intention: An Integrative Model Based on Health Consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    Hypotheses Testing (§4.4; page unavailable) reports a significant direct association between health consciousness and green-food purchase intention among Chinese consumers. The paper also examines psychological and social factors, but the cited passages do not show that health consciousness operates through those factors; they are modeled as separate influences on intention. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Health consciousness has emerged as a key driver of healthy food purchase decisions in the post-pandemic era.

    “with heightened health consciousness emerging as a key driver of purchase decisions [1,2,3,4,5,6]”

    From Psychological Determinants of Healthy Food Purchase Intention: An Integrative Model Based on Health Consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion reports that health consciousness was a significant driver of Chinese consumers’ green food purchase intentions during the pandemic. It does not establish the same relationship for post-pandemic purchase decisions, rather than intentions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [52]Kline R.B. Principals and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 3rd ed. The Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2011
  2. [56]Hair J.F. Black W.C. Babin B.J. Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis Pearson Harlow, UK 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qi, X., & Ploeger, A.
Affiliations
University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Qi, Xin
Venue
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-26
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1200
ISSN
2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164929864
Cited by
146
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 7
FWCI
24.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Kassel
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
green food, purchase intention, theory of planned behavior, COVID-19 pandemic, moral attitudes, health consciousness, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, attitudes, green food consumption, Chinese consumers, sustainable consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review