Cited by 17Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Comparative Genomic Analysis of Bifidobacterium bifidum Strains Isolated from Different Niches

Open access
Lu, Wenwei, Pei, Zhangming, Zang, Mengning, Lee, Yuan-kun, Zhao, Jianxin, Chen, Wei, Wang, Hongchao, Zhang, Hao·2021·Genes

Abstract

The potential probiotic benefits of Bifidobacterium bifidum have received increasing attention recently. We used comparative genomic analysis to explore the differences in the genome and the physiological characteristics of B. bifidum isolated from the fecal samples of Chinese adults and infants. The relationships between genotypes and phenotypes were analyzed to assess the effects of isolation sources on the genetic variation of B. bifidum. The phylogenetic tree results indicated that the phylogeny of B. bifidum may be related to the geographical features of its isolation source. B. bifidum was found to have an open pan-genome and a conserved core genome. The genetic diversity of B. bifidum is mainly reflected in carbohydrate metabolism- and immune/competition-related factors, such as the glycoside hydrolase gene family, bacteriocin operons, antibiotic resistance genes, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas. Additionally, the type III A CRISPR-Cas system was discovered in B. bifidum for the first time. B. bifidum strains exhibited niche-specific characteristics, and the results of this study provide an improved understanding of the genetics of this species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes12101504

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous comparative genomics studies of B. bifidum, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure.

    “Previous comparative genomics studies of this species, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure [29-32] .”

    From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction says there was only one earlier comparative genomics study of B. bifidum and that its 15-strain analysis proposed a closed pan-genome—the opposite of the claim that previous studies consistently reported an open one. This paper's own 140-genome analysis finds an open pan-genome (Results, §3.2), although its Discussion also describes previous studies as finding one. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A larger survey of 140 strains isolated from Chinese adult and infant feces confirmed an open pangenome and traced most intraspecific diversity to carbohydrate metabolism and defense-related functions, indicating the type III-A CRISPR-Cas locus as characteristic of this taxon, with phylogenetic clustering tracking both geographic origin and host age.

    “A larger survey of 140 strains isolated from Chinese adult and infant feces later confirmed an open pangenome and traced most of the observed intraspecific diversity to carbohydrate metabolism and defense-related functions, including glycoside hydrolase content, bacteriocin operons, antibiotic-resistance genes, and CRISPR-Cas systems, indicating the type III-A CRISPR-Cas locus as characteristic of”

    From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The genomic diversity of B. bifidum has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.

    “Despite its relevance in early life, the species' genomic diversity has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, W., Pei, Z., Zang, M., Lee, Y.-K., Zhao, J., Chen, W., Wang, H., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Hongchao
  • Zhang, Hao
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-09-25
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1504
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203125872
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Bifidobacterium bifidum, comparative genomics, pan-genome, core genome, genetic diversity, probiotics, gut microbiota, antibiotic resistance genes, CRISPR-Cas, phylogeny
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium bifidum, Adult, Feces, Genes, Bacterial, Humans, Infant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review