Cited by 5Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and Health

Comparative genomic analysis revealed that dietary habits affected the adaptation of Bifidobacterium bifidum to the intestinal tract in different geographic populations

Open access
Li, Min, Yu, Jie, Li, Weicheng, Wu, Qiong, Sun, Jiaqi, Sun, Zhihong·2024·Food Science and Human Wellness

Abstract

Recent research on the genome of Bifidobacterium bifidum has mainly focused on the isolation sources (intestinal tract niche) recently, but reports on the isolation region are limited. This study analyzed the differences in the genome of B. bifidum isolated from different geographical populations by comparative genomic analysis. Results at the genome level indicated that the GC content of American isolates was significantly higher than that of Chinese and Russian isolates. The phylogenetic tree, based on 919 core genes showed that B. bifidum might be related to the geographical characteristics of isolation region. Furthermore, functional annotation analysis demonstrated that copy numbers of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZys) involved in the degradation of polysaccharide from plant and host sources in B. bifidum were high, and 18 CAZys showed significant differences across different geographical populations, indicating that B. bifidum had adapted to the human intestinal environment, especially in the groups with diets rich in fiber. Dietary habits were one of the main reasons for the differences of B. bifidum across different geographical populations. Additionally, B. bifidum exhibited high diversity, evident in glycoside hydrolases, the CRISPR-Cas system, and prophages. This study provides a genetic basis for further research and development of B. bifidum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26599/fshw.2022.9250243

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous comparative genomics studies of B. bifidum, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure.

    “Previous comparative genomics studies of this species, limited to smaller datasets of cultured isolates from Westernized populations, consistently reported an open pangenome structure [29-32] .”

    From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    Section 3.3 reports an open pangenome in this paper's analysis of 110 B. bifidum genomes. But the Discussion says earlier studies reported a closed pangenome, not consistently an open one; the Introduction and section 3.1 also describe genomes from China, the USA, Russia, and unknown origins, rather than a dataset limited to cultured isolates from Westernized populations. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The genomic diversity of B. bifidum has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.

    “Despite its relevance in early life, the species' genomic diversity has not yet been comprehensively surveyed, and current reference collections capture only a fraction of the global B. bifidum pangenome.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Yu, J., Li, W., Wu, Q., Sun, J., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Zhihong
Venue
Food Science and Human Wellness
Published
2024-09
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
3006-3017
ISSN
  • 2097-0765 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-4530
OpenAlex
W4388247830
Cited by
5
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Food Science and Human Wellness (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32325040)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2020ZD12)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Bifidobacterium bifidum, dietary habits, intestinal adaptation, genome-wide comparison, GC content, carbohydrate-active enzymes, polysaccharide degradation, dietary fiber, glycoside hydrolases, CRISPR-Cas, prophages, core genes, gut microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review