Cited by 69Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout Research

Mindfulness and Athlete Burnout: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Li, Chunxiao, Zhu, Yuxin, Zhang, Mengge, Gustafsson, Henrik, Chen, Tao·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to identify, appraise, and synthesize studies reporting the relationship between mindfulness and athlete burnout and the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on athlete burnout. Methods: Studies were identified through searching six electronic databases using combinations of three groups of keywords and manual search. Two independent reviewers screened the searched studies, extracted data of the included studies, and assessed the study quality. The extracted data were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: Ten studies consisting of two controlled trials, six surveys, and two interview studies met the inclusion criteria. The two controlled trials had weak methodological quality, and the remaining studies were of moderate to high research quality. Results of controlled trials and interview research generally showed that MBIs had positive effects in burnout prevention. Meta-analytic results indicated a negative association between mindfulness and burnout. Conclusions: There is some evidence showing that mindfulness was negatively associated with athlete burnout. However, given the small number of interventions and qualitative studies, there is limited evidence on whether MBIs are useful in preventing athlete burnout. More studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16030449

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional evidence has shown that MBIs may enhance personal well-being, perceptual sensitivity, processing speed, empathy, concentration, reaction time, motor skills, immune function, and performance outcomes.

    “Additional evidence has also shown that MBIs may enhance personal well-being, perceptual sensitivity, processing speed, empathy, concentration, reaction time, motor skills, immune function, and performance outcomes. 40-45”

    From Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Interventions Over the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis. (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction (page unavailable in our copy) reports beneficial effects of MBIs on athletic performance, supporting the performance-outcomes portion. The Results (§3.4.1) also report reduced burnout in youth athletes, but the paper does not report MBI effects on the listed perceptual, cognitive, motor, empathy, or immune outcomes, nor does it establish the broader personal-well-being claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [46]Hayes S.C. Strosahl K.D. Wilson K.G. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 1999
  2. [53]Higgins P.H. Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, UK 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Zhu, Y., Zhang, M., Gustafsson, H., & Chen, T.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Karlstad University (SE)
  • Guangzhou Sport University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Chunxiao
  • Chen, Tao
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-02-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
449
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914975516
Cited by
69
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet (Diva) (Karlstad University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
mindfulness, athlete burnout, mindfulness-based interventions, burnout prevention, athletes, sport psychology
MeSH terms
Burnout, Psychological, Humans, Athletes, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review