Cited by 393Agriculture and Farm SafetyMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers’ Mental Health: A Systematic Review

Open access
Daghagh Yazd, Sahar, Wheeler, Sarah Ann, Zuo, Alec·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Recently, concern has increased globally over farmers’ mental health issues. We present a systematic review of the outcomes, locations, study designs, and methods of current studies on farmers’ mental health. In particular, this review aims to fill an important gap in understanding of the potential key risk factors affecting farmers’ mental health around the world. 167 articles on farmer mental health were included in a final systematic review using a standardized electronic literature search strategy and PRISMA guidelines. The four most-cited influences on farmers’ mental health in the reviewed literature respectively were pesticide exposure, financial difficulties, climate variabilities/drought, and poor physical health/past injuries. The majority of studies were from developed countries, most specifically from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Comparative studies on the mental health of farmers and other occupational workers showed mixed results, with a larger portion identifying that psychological health disturbances were more common in farmers and farm-workers. Knowledge of farmer psychological disorder risk factors and its impacts are essential for reducing the burden of mental illness. Further research will be required on climate change impacts, developing country farmers’ mental health, and information on how to reduce help-seeking barriers amongst farmers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16234849

Cites

185 of 186 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic for identifying studies.
Figure 1 Schematic for identifying studies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Number of farmers’ mental health studies published by country.
Figure 2 Number of farmers’ mental health studies published by country.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Number of farmers’ mental health studies from 1979 to April 2019.
Figure 3 Number of farmers’ mental health studies from 1979 to April 2019.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 186 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hedlund, 1979, The incidence of socialpsychologicl stress in farm families, Int. J. Sociol. Fam., 9, 233
  2. Williams, 2001, The ongoing farm crisis: Health, mental health and safety issues in Wisconsin, Rural Ment. Health, 26, 15
  3. Beseler, C. (2005). Diagnosed Depression and Low, Intermediate, and High Pesticide Exposures in Iowa and North Carolina Farm Applicators and Their Spouses Enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study. [Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University].
  4. Welke, C. (2004). Farm/Ranch Stressors and the Distress and Job Satisfaction of Farm Family Members: The Buffering Effects of Perceived Social Support. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Dakota].
  5. Berry, H.L., Kelly, B.J., Hanigan, I.C., Coates, J.H., McMichael, A.J., Welsh, J.A., and Kjellstrom, T. (2008). Rural mental health impacts of climate change. Commissioned Report for the Garnaut Climate Change Review, The Australian National University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 390

Metadata

Authors
Daghagh Yazd, S., Wheeler, S. A., & Zuo, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Global Food and Resources, Faculty of Professions, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Wheeler, Sarah Ann
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-02
Volume
16
Issue
23
Pages
4849
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990842690
Cited by
393
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 20
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT140100773)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
farmer mental health, risk factors, pesticide exposure, financial hardship, climate variability, drought, physical health, occupational injuries, farm workers, mental illness, help-seeking barriers, climate change impacts
MeSH terms
Farmers, Adult, Agriculture, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review