Cited by 256Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsFluorine in Organic Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 180 of the 183 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of the Applications, Environmental Release, and Remediation Technologies of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Open access
Meegoda, Jay N., Kewalramani, Jitendra A., Li, Brian, Marsh, Richard W.·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are pollutants that have demonstrated a high level of environmental persistence and are very difficult to remediate. As the body of literature on their environmental effects has increased, so has regulatory and research scrutiny. The widespread usage of PFAS in industrial applications and consumer products, complicated by their environmental release, mobility, fate, and transport, have resulted in multiple exposure routes for humans. Furthermore, low screening levels and stringent regulatory standards that vary by state introduce considerable uncertainty and potential costs in the environmental management of PFAS. The recalcitrant nature of PFAS render their removal difficult, but existing and emerging technologies can be leveraged to destroy or sequester PFAS in a variety of environmental matrices. Additionally, new research on PFAS remediation technologies has emerged to address the efficiency, costs, and other shortcomings of existing remediation methods. Further research on the impact of field parameters such as secondary water quality effects, the presence of co-contaminants and emerging PFAS, reaction mechanisms, defluorination yields, and the decomposition products of treatment technologies is needed to fully evaluate these emerging technologies, and industry attention should focus on treatment train approaches to improve efficiency and reduce the cost of treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17218117

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 183 references

3 of the 183 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jansen, 2019, ‘Forever Chemicals’ No More? These Technologies Aim to Destroy PFAS in Water, Chem. Eng. News, 97, 1
  2. Dean, 2020, A Framework for Regulation of New and Existing PFAS by EPA, J. Sci. Policy Gov., 16, 14
  3. Zemba, S. (2019, January 14–15). PFAS Cycling Between Landfills and WWTPs. Proceedings of the Environmental Research and Education Summit (EREF), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  4. Dickenson, E.R.V., and Verdugo, E.M. (2018). Perfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment, CRC Press.
  5. Scollitt-Davis, J. (2020, March 07). AECOM to Launch PFAS Solution DE-FLUOROTM at CleanUp 2019 in Adelaide. Available online: https://aecom.com/press-releases/aecom-to-launch-pfas-solution-de-fluoro-at-cleanup-2019-in-adelaide/#:~:text=PressRelease-,AECOMtolaunchPFASsolutionDE-FLUORO,atCleanUp2019inAdelaide&text=ADELAIDE(Sept.,‘PFAS’)atCleanUp2019.
  6. Field, J.A. (2019, January 14–15). PFASs in Leachate and Wastewater. Proceedings of the Environmental Research and Education Summit (EREF), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 256

Metadata

Authors
Meegoda, J. N., Kewalramani, J. A., Li, B., & Marsh, R. W.
Affiliations
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Meegoda, Jay N.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-03
Volume
17
Issue
21
Pages
8117
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095851882
Cited by
256
References
183
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2016168)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, environmental persistence, environmental release, PFAS fate and transport, human exposure pathways, PFAS regulation, remediation strategies, defluorination, emerging PFAS, co-contaminants, treatment train
MeSH terms
Construction Materials, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review