Cited by 728COVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Americans’ COVID-19 stress, coping, and adherence to CDC guidelines

Open access
Park, Crystal L., Russell, Beth S., Fendrich, Michael, Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy, Hutchison, Morica, Becker, Jessica·2020·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance Documenting Americans' stress responses to an unprecedented pandemic and their degree of adherence to CDC guidelines is essential for mental health interventions and policy-making.Objective To provide the first snapshot of immediate impact of COVID-19 on Americans' stress, coping, and guideline adherence.Design Data were collected from an online workers' platform for survey research (Amazon's Mechanical Turk) from April 7 to 9, 2020. The current data represents the baseline of a longitudinal study. Best practices for ensuring high-quality data were employed.Participants Individuals who are 18 years of age or older, living in the USA, and English-speaking were eligible for the study. Of 1086 unique responses, 1015 completed responses are included.Setting Population-based.Main outcomes Exposure to and stressfulness of COVID-19 stressors, coping strategies, and adherence to CDC guidelines.Results The sample was 53.9% women (n = 547), with an average age of 38.9 years (SD = 13.50, range = 18-88), most of whom were White (n = 836, 82.4%), non-Hispanic (n = 929, 91.5%), and straight/heterosexual (n = 895, 88.2%); 40% were currently married (n = 407), and 21.6% (n = 219) were caregivers. About half (50.5%) endorsed having at least "mostly" enough money to meet their needs. Respondents' locations across the USA ranged from 18.5% in the Northeast to 37.8% in the South. The most commonly experienced stressors were reading/hearing about the severity and contagiousness of COVID-19, uncertainty about length of quarantine and social distancing requirements, and changes to social and daily personal care routines. Financial concerns were rated most stressful. Younger age, female gender, and caregiver status increased risk for stressor exposure and greater degree of stressfulness. The most frequently reported strategies to manage stress were distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional social support. CDC guideline adherence was generally high, but several key social distancing and hygiene behaviors showed suboptimal adherence, particularly for men and younger adults.Conclusions and relevance Americans have high COVID-19 stress exposure and some demographic subgroups appear particularly vulnerable to stress effects. Subgroups less likely to adhere to CDC guidelines may benefit from targeted information campaigns. these findings may guide mental health interventions and inform policy-making regarding implications of specific public health measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the initial lockdown period, American adults commonly dealt with stress through distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional support.

    “Research conducted during the initial lockdown period found that American adults commonly dealt with stress through distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional support [31]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hitlin, H. Research in the crowdsourcing age, a case study: How scholars, companies and workers are using Mechanical Turk, a 'gig economy' platform, for tasks computers can't handle. Pew Research Center, July 2016. (http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research- in-the-crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, C. L., Russell, B. S., Fendrich, M., Finkelstein-Fox, L., Hutchison, M., & Becker, J.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Crystal L.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
2296-2303
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W3031875368
Cited by
728
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 49 · 2015: 1
FWCI
61.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R34AA027455)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, psychological stress, coping strategies, social distancing, hygiene practices, financial stress, caregiver burden, gender differences, age differences, social support, mental health
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Guidelines as Topic, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Guideline Adherence, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review