Cited by 7Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Differences in free-living patterns of sedentary behaviour between office employees with diabetes and office employees without diabetes: a principal component analysis for clinical practice

Open access
Colomer, Francesc Alòs, Cugat, Mª Àngels Colomer, Bort-Roig, Judit, Chirveches-Pérez, Emilia, Zaldúa, Yoseba Cánovas, Martín-Cantera, Carlos, Franch-Nadal, Josep, Puig-Ribera, Anna·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

AIMS: To identify principal components of free-living patterns of sedentary behaviour in office employees with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to normal glucose metabolism (NGM) office employees, using principal component analysis (PCA). METHODS: = 132 with NGM) wore an activPAL inclinometer 24 h a day for 7 consecutive days. Comparions of sedentary behaviour patterns between adults with T2D and NGM determined the dimensions that best characterise the sedentary behaviour patterns of office employees with T2D at work, outside work and at weekends. RESULTS: The multivariate PCA technique identified two components that explained 60% of the variability present in the data of sedentary behaviour patterns in the population with diabetes. This was characterised by a fewer number of daily breaks and breaks in time intervals of less than 20 min both at work, outside work and at weekends. On average, adults with T2D took fewer 31 breaks/day than adults without diabetes. CONCLUSION: Effective interventions from clinical practice to tackle prolonged sedentary behaviour in office employees with T2D should focus on increasing the number of daily sedentary breaks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph191912245

Cites

30 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colomer, F. A., Cugat, M. À. C., Bort-Roig, J., Chirveches-Pérez, E., Zaldúa, Y. C., Martín-Cantera, C., Franch-Nadal, J., & Puig-Ribera, A.
Affiliations
  • Primary Healthcare Centre Passeig de Sant Joan, Catalan Health Institute, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
  • Department of Mathematics, ETSEA, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
  • Sport and Physical Activity Research Group, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain
  • Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (ES)
  • Institut Català de la Salut (ES)
  • Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (ES)
  • Member of the redGDPS Foundation, 08204 Sabadell, Spain
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-27
Volume
19
Issue
19
Pages
12245
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297539462
Cited by
7
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RIUVic (UVic-UCC) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI17/01788, DEP2021-37169, redgdps/BJLTB/02/2022)
  • the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PI17/01788, DEP2021-37169, redgdps/BJLTB/02/2022)
  • grant Jose Luís Torres from redGDPS Foundation (PI17/01788, DEP2021-37169, redgdps/BJLTB/02/2022)
  • the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (PI17/01788, DEP2021-37169, redgdps/BJLTB/02/2022)
  • the Càtedra Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)—Novartis for research in Family and Community Medicine (PI17/01788, DEP2021-37169, redgdps/BJLTB/02/2022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
sedentary behavior, type 2 diabetes, office workers, sedentary breaks, workplace physical activity, sedentary behavior interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Habits, Humans, Workplace, Principal Component Analysis, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review