Cited by 4Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsNutritional Studies and Diet

Maternal and dietary factors are associated with metabolic syndrome in women with a previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus

Open access
Hasbullah, Farah Yasmin, Mohd Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak, Abdul Ghani, Rohana, Mat Daud, Zulfitri ‘Azuan, Appannah, Geeta, Abas, Faridah, Shyam, Sangeetha·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

While it is known that women with a previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus (post-GDM) have a higher risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS), evidence of lifestyle practices from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is still scarce. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with MetS in women post-GDM. This cross-sectional study involved 157 women post-GDM (mean age 34.8 ± 5.6 years) sampled from Selangor, Malaysia. We collected data on sociodemographic characteristics and obstetric history. Food intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, and dietary patterns were derived from principal component analysis. MetS was diagnosed according to the 2009 Harmonized criteria. The prevalence of MetS in this study was 22.3%. Western dietary pattern consumption was correlated with MetS, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and triglyceride levels. Independent factors associated with MetS were lower education level (odds ratio, OR 4.017, p = 0.007), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 1.192, p = 0.002), and Caesarean delivery (OR 3.798, p = 0.009). The study identified the maternal and dietary factors associated with MetS in women post-GDM in Malaysia. Community-based interventions that include dietary modification are warranted to prevent MetS and its complications, thus helping to reduce the overall disease burden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph192416797

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal dietary issues are contributing factors to metabolic syndrome in women who have had gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “Women who have had GDM before are especially vulnerable to developing metabolic syndrome, and maternal dietary issues are also contributing factors (11).”

    From Maternal nutritional status and the risk of metabolic syndrome in pregnancy: implications for public health nutrition (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction reports that women with prior GDM have more than three times the risk of metabolic syndrome compared with women with normoglycemic pregnancies. The Discussion reports an association between a Western dietary pattern and metabolic syndrome in women with prior GDM, but it does not establish that dietary issues cause or contribute to the syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women who have had gestational diabetes mellitus before are especially vulnerable to developing metabolic syndrome.

    “Women who have had GDM before are especially vulnerable to developing metabolic syndrome, and maternal dietary issues are also contributing factors (11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasbullah, F. Y., Mohd Yusof, B.-N., Abdul Ghani, R., Mat Daud, Z. ‘., Appannah, G., Abas, F., & Shyam, S.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh 47000, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-14
Volume
19
Issue
24
Pages
16797
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311510856
Cited by
4
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education (5540099)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, gestational diabetes mellitus, dietary habits, Western dietary pattern, maternal factors, educational attainment, pre-pregnancy body mass index, cesarean section, triglycerides, waist circumference, low- and middle-income countries, Malaysia
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Malaysia, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review