Cited by 55Nanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsAnimal testing and alternativesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Human 3D Cultures as Models for Evaluating Magnetic Nanoparticle CNS Cytotoxicity after Short- and Repeated Long-Term Exposure

Open access
De Simone, Uliana, Roccio, Marianna, Gribaldo, Laura, Spinillo, Arsenio, Caloni, Francesca, Coccini, Teresa·2018·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Since nanoparticles (NPs) can translocate to the brain and impact the highly vulnerable central nervous system (CNS), novel in vitro tools for the assessment of NP-induced neurotoxicity are advocated. In this study, two types of CNS spheroids have been developed from human D384 astrocyte- and SH-SY5Y neuronal-like cells, and optimized in combination with standard assays (viability readout and cell morphology) to test neurotoxic effects caused by Fe3O4NPs, as NP-model, after short- (24–48 h; 1–100µg/ml) and long-term repeated exposure (30days; 0.1–25µg/ml). Short-term exposure of 3D-spheroids to Fe3O4NP induced cytotoxicity at 10 µg/mL in astrocytes and 25 µg/mL neurons. After long-term repeated dose regimen, spheroids showed concentration- and time-dependent cell mortality at 10 µg/mL for D384 and 0.5 µg/mL for SH-SY5Y, indicating a higher susceptibility of neurons than astrocytes. Both spheroid types displayed cell disaggregation after the first week of treatment at ≥0.1 µg/mL and becoming considerably evident at higher concentrations and over time. Recreating the 3D-spatial environment of the CNS allows cells to behave in vitro more closely to the in vivo situations, therefore providing a model that can be used as a stand-alone test or as a part of integrated testing strategies. These models could drive an improvement in the species-relevant predictivity of toxicity testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms19071993

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In spheroid-based assays, drug efficacy is often assessed by comparing changes in spheroid size over time relative to untreated controls.

    “In spheroid-based assays, drug efficacy is often assessed by comparing changes in spheroid size over time relative to untreated controls [301,302,303].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [302]

    Methods §4.7 describes measuring spheroid size before and after treatment and monitoring growth over time; §4.5 identifies untreated control spheroids. But this study evaluates magnetic-nanoparticle cytotoxicity, not drug efficacy, and the cited passages do not establish that efficacy is often assessed by comparing size changes with untreated controls. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Simone, U., Roccio, M., Gribaldo, L., Spinillo, A., Caloni, F., & Coccini, T.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Toxicology, Toxicology Unit, ICS Maugeri SpA-BC, IRCCS Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
Corresponding author
Coccini, Teresa
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-07-08
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
1993
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2816246267
Cited by
55
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
magnetic nanoparticles, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, neurotoxicity, central nervous system, multicellular spheroids, astrocytes, SH-SY5Y cells, repeated-dose exposure, cytotoxicity, cell viability, cell morphology, cell disaggregation, in vitro toxicity models, integrated testing strategies
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Central Nervous System, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Models, Biological, Time Factors, Spheroids, Cellular, Cell Culture Techniques, Magnetite Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review