Cited by 33Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Connectome analysis of brain functional network alterations in depressive patients with suicidal attempt

Open access
Weng, Jun-Cheng, Chou, Yu-Syuan, Tsai, Yuan-Hsiung, Lee, Chun-Te, Hsieh, Ming-Hong, Chen, Vincent·2019·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Our study aimed to clarify the neuroimaging correlates of suicide attempt by comparing differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) among depressed suicide attempters, depressed patients without suicide attempt history, and healthy controls through comprehensive and novel fMRI analyses and methods in the same study population. The association between depression severity and aspects of the brain imaging was also discussed. Our study recruited 109 participants who were assigned to three groups: 33 depressed patients with suicide attempt (SA), 32 depressed patients without suicide attempt (NS), and 44 healthy controls (HC). All participants were scanned using a 3 T MRI imaging system to obtain resting-state functional images. In seed-based correlation analysis, we found altered functional connectivity in some brain regions of the SA compared with the NS or HC, especially in the hippocampus and thalamus. In the voxel-based analysis, our results showed differential activation and regional homogeneity of the temporal lobe and several brain regions in the SA compared with the NS and HC. We also found that some brain areas correlated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), anxiety, and depression scores, especially in the frontal and temporal lobes. Graph theoretical analysis (GTA) and network-based statistical (NBS) analyses revealed different topological organization as well as slightly better global integration and worse local segregation of the brain network (i.e., more like a random network) in depressed participants compared with healthy participants. We concluded that the brain function of major depressive disorders with and without suicide attempts changed compared with healthy participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm8111966

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered seed-based connectivity has been found in the hippocampus, thalamus, and temporal lobe as well as the inferior frontal, orbital, and parietal lobes.

    “In addition, altered seed-based connectivity has been found in the hippocampus, thalamus, and temporal lobe (69) as well as the inferior frontal, orbital, and parietal lobes (75).”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

  • These studies have mostly assessed suicide risk in larger clinical samples of participants diagnosed with mood disorders and other psychiatric conditions with which suicide is a comorbid phenotype, but rarely have they investigated suicide transdiagnostically.

    “Finally, these studies have mostly assessed suicide risk in larger clinical samples of participants diagnosed with mood disorders (64–75) and other psychiatric conditions (76–79) with which suicide is a comorbid phenotype, but rarely have they investigated suicide transdiagnostically.”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weng, J.-C., Chou, Y.-S., Tsai, Y.-H., Lee, C.-T., Hsieh, M.-H., & Chen, V.
Affiliations
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Vincent
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1966
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2989282846
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (NSC102-2314-B-182-068-MY3, MOST105-2314-B-182-028, and MOST106-2314-B-182-040-MY3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
suicide attempts, major depressive disorder, functional connectivity, brain network topology, hippocampus, thalamus, regional homogeneity, temporal lobe activation, graph-theoretical analysis, depression severity, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review