The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits
Open accessAbstract
Conventionally, in a linear economy, C&D (Construction and Demolition) waste was considered as zero value materials, and, as a result of that, most C&D waste materials ended up in landfills. In recent years, with the increase in the awareness around sustainability and resource management, various countries have started to explore new models to minimize the use of limited resources which are currently overused, mismanaged, or quickly depleting. In this regard, the implementation of CE (Circular Economy) has emerged as a potential model to minimize the negative impact of C&D wastes on the environment. However, there are some challenges hindering a full transition to CE in the construction and demolition sectors. Therefore, this review paper aims to critically scrutinize different aspects of C&D waste and how CE can be integrated into construction projects. Reviewing of the literature revealed that the barriers in the implementation of CE in C&D waste sectors fall in five main domains, namely legal, technical, social, behavioral, and economic aspects. In this context, it was found that policy and governance, permits and specifications, technological limitation, quality and performance, knowledge and information, and, finally, the costs associated with the implementation of CE model at the early stage are the main barriers. In addition to these, from the contractors’ perspective, C&D waste dismantling, segregation, and on-site sorting, transportation, and local recovery processes are the main challenges at the start point for small-scale companies. To address the abovementioned challenges, and also to minimize the ambiguity of resulting outcomes by implementing CE in C&D waste sectors, there is an urgent need to introduce a global framework and a practicable pathway to allow companies to implement such models, regardless of their scale and location. Additionally, in this paper, recommendations on the direction for areas of future studies for a reduction in the environmental impacts have been provided. To structure an effective model approach, the future direction should be more focused on dismantling practices, hazardous material handling, quality control on waste acceptance, and material recovery processes, as well as a incentivization mechanism to promote ecological, economic, and social benefits of the CE for C&D sectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry
Azhar, S. (2011) · Leadership and Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)lm.1943-5630.0000127 · Cited by 2,192
The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China
Yuan, Z., Bi, J., & Moriguichi, Y. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819806775545321 · Cited by 1,175
Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle
Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., & Ren, J. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029 · Cited by 1,047
Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B. (2008) · International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology · doi:10.3843/susdev.15.3:6 · Cited by 855
Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe
Gálvez-Martos, J.-L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., & Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016 · Cited by 816
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M. S., Eskicioglu, C., & Sadiq, R. (2013) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6 · Cited by 640
Hossain, M. U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-Afari, P., & Amor, B. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109948 · Cited by 614
Effects of waste PET bottles aggregate on the properties of concrete
Choi, Y.-W., Moon, D.-J., Chung, J.-S., & Cho, S.-K. (2005) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.014 · Cited by 586
López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238 · Cited by 538
Cited by
AlJaber, A., Martinez-Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13112778 · Cited by 130
Circular economy business model in the construction industry: a systematic review
Jayakodi, S., Senaratne, S., & Perera, S. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14020379 · Cited by 33
Architects as catalysts of reuse in construction
Nicholson, V., & Miatto, A. (2024) · Nature Cities · doi:10.1038/s44284-024-00042-8 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Purchase, C. K., Al Zulayq, D. M., O’Brien, B. T., Kowalewski, M. J., Berenjian, A., Tarighaleslami, A. H., & Seifan, M.
- Venue
- Materials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76
- ISSN
- 1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200402773
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 18.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ma15010076
- The paper
- Purchase, C. K., Al Zulayq, D. M., O’Brien, B. T., Kowalewski, M. J., Berenjian, A., Tarighaleslami, A. H., & Seifan, M. (2021). Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.