The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Phytogenic Substances for Optimizing Gut Health in Poultry
Open accessAbstract
The gut microbiota has been designated as a hidden metabolic ‘organ’ because of its enormous impact on host metabolism, physiology, nutrition, and immune function. The connection between the intestinal microbiota and their respective host animals is dynamic and, in general, mutually beneficial. This complicated interaction is seen as a determinant of health and disease; thus, intestinal dysbiosis is linked with several metabolic diseases. Therefore, tractable strategies targeting the regulation of intestinal microbiota can control several diseases that are closely related to inflammatory and metabolic disorders. As a result, animal health and performance are improved. One of these strategies is related to dietary supplementation with prebiotics, probiotics, and phytogenic substances. These supplements exert their effects indirectly through manipulation of gut microbiota quality and improvement in intestinal epithelial barrier. Several phytogenic substances, such as berberine, resveratrol, curcumin, carvacrol, thymol, isoflavones and hydrolyzed fibers, have been identified as potential supplements that may also act as welcome means to reduce the usage of antibiotics in feedstock, including poultry farming, through manipulation of the gut microbiome. In addition, these compounds may improve the integrity of tight junctions by controlling tight junction-related proteins and inflammatory signaling pathways in the host animals. In this review, we discuss the role of probiotics, prebiotics, and phytogenic substances in optimizing gut function in poultry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444
Lagouge, M., Argmann, C., Gerhart-Hines, Z., Meziane, H., Lerin, C., Daussin, F., Messadeq, N., Milne, J., Lambert, P., Elliott, P., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.013 · Cited by 4,057
The gut flora as a forgotten organ
O'Hara, A. M., & Shanahan, F. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400731 · Cited by 2,791
Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system
Kau, A. L., Ahern, P. P., Griffin, N. W., Goodman, A. L., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10213 · Cited by 2,588
The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice
Braniste, V., Al-Asmakh, M., Kowal, C., Anuar, F., Abbaspour, A., Tóth, M., Korecka, A., Bakocevic, N., Ng, L. G., Kundu, P., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009759 · Cited by 2,530
The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age
Mariat, D., Firmesse, O., Levenez, F., Guimarăes, V., Sokol, H., Doré, J., Corthier, G., & Furet, J.-P. (2009) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-123 · Cited by 1,755
Intestinal permeability – a new target for disease prevention and therapy
Bischoff, S. C., Barbara, G., Buurman, W., Ockhuizen, T., Schulzke, J.-D., Serino, M., Tilg, H., Watson, A., & Wells, J. M. (2014) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7 · Cited by 1,755
An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities
Adak, A., & Khan, M. R. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4 · Cited by 1,485
Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition
Costea, P. I., Hildebrand, F., Arumugam, M., Bäckhed, F., Blaser, M. J., Bushman, F. D., de Vos, W. M., Ehrlich, S. D., Fraser, C. M., Hattori, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8 · Cited by 1,138
Crosstalk of tight junction components with signaling pathways
González-Mariscal, L., Tapia, R., & Chamorro, D. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.08.018 · Cited by 759
Cited by
Probiotics: mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries
Latif, A., Shehzad, A., Niazi, S., Zahid, A., Ashraf, W., Iqbal, M. W., Rehman, A., Riaz, T., Aadil, R. M., Khan, I. M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216674 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Shehata, A. A., Yalçın, S., Latorre, J. D., Basiouni, S., Attia, Y. A., Abd El-Wahab, A., Visscher, C., El-Seedi, H. R., Huber, C., Hafez, H. M., Eisenreich, W., & Tellez-Isaias, G.
- Venue
- Microorganisms
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-02-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 395
- ISSN
- 2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210977188
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 30.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Phytogenic Substances for Optimizing Gut Health in Poultry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/microorganisms10020395
- The paper
- Shehata, A. A., Yalçın, S., Latorre, J. D., Basiouni, S., Attia, Y. A., Abd El-Wahab, A., Visscher, C., El-Seedi, H. R., Huber, C., Hafez, H. M., Eisenreich, W., & Tellez-Isaias, G. (2022). Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Phytogenic Substances for Optimizing Gut Health in Poultry. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
