Cited by 12Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsSafety Warnings and Signage

An Experimental Comparison of the Impact of ‘Warning’ and ‘Health Star Rating’ FoP Labels on Adolescents’ Choice of Breakfast Cereals in New Zealand

Open access
Hamlin, Robert, Hamlin, Benjamin·2020·Nutrients

Abstract

This research investigated the performance of the red, octagonal Vienna Convention traffic ‘STOP’ sign as a front of pack (FoP) warning nutritional label. While the Vienna Convention traffic light system is an established FoP label, the potential of the ‘STOP’ sign in the role has not been investigated. The performance of the ‘STOP’ label was compared with that of a single star (low nutritional value) Australasian Health Star Rating (HSR) label using a fractionally replicated Latin square design. The labels were presented on choice diads of cold breakfast cereal packets. The sample of 240 adolescents aged 16–18 was drawn from a secondary school in the South Island of New Zealand. A large and significant main effect was observed at the p < 0.01 level for the difference between the ’STOP’ sign and the control condition (no nutritional FoP label), and at p < 0.05 for the difference between the HSR and the ‘STOP’ label. There was no significant difference between the HSR FoP and the control condition. A significant non-additivity (interaction) (p < 0.01) was also observed via the fractional replication. The results indicate that the Vienna Convention ‘STOP’ sign is worthy of further research with regard to its potential as an FoP nutritional label.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu12061545

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed EU PEF label may be beyond the FMCG consumer's capacity to process in any useful way.

    “This research along with other similar experimental results [45,47] indicate that this may be beyond the FMCG consumer's capacity to process in any useful way.”

    From Marketing Tactics for Sustainable Fashion and the Circular Economy: The Impact of Ethical Labels on Fast Fashion Choice (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the Health Star Rating label was not clearly able to help consumers discriminate against low-nutritional-value products, and the Introduction describes food purchasing as a low-involvement process. Those passages support a concern about whether consumers use some labels effectively, but the study tested breakfast-cereal labels with New Zealand adolescents, not the proposed EU PEF label or FMCG consumers generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This type of ordinal label malfunction has been observed in FoP nutritional labelling in the food industry.

    “While this type of malfunction has been observed in FoP nutritional labelling in the food industry [46,47]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Hamlin R. Marketing and regulation associated with food attributes Consumer Perception of Food Attributes: Consumer Perception of Food Attributes Shigeru M. Otsuki T. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2018 233 251
  2. [4]Kelly B. Jewell J. What is the Evidence on the Policy Specifications, Development Processes and Effectiveness of Existing Front-of-Pack Food Labelling Policies in the WHO European Region? WHO Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen, Denmark 2018 (Health Evidence Network (HEN) synthesis report 61) 30484994
  3. [51]Education Review Office (NZ) Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity in NZ Schools and Early Learning Services ERO Wellington Wellington, New Zealand 2017 Available online: https://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/food-nutrition-and-physical-activity-in-nz-schools-and-early-learning-services/ (accessed on 15 March 2019)
  4. [52]Education Review Office (NZ) “Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity in New Zealand Schools and Early Learning Services: Key Findings 2016” ERO Wellington, New Zealand 2016 Available online: https://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Key-findings-report-food-nutrition-and-physical-activity.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2019)
  5. [58]Banks S. Experimentation in Marketing McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 1965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamlin, R., & Hamlin, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Taieri College; 3 Green Street, Mosgiel 9024, New Zealand
Corresponding author
Hamlin, Robert
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1545
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3031201794
Cited by
12
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Safety Warnings and Signage
Keywords
front-of-pack nutrition labels, Health Star Rating, adolescents, breakfast cereals, food choice, nutrition information
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Edible Grain, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Female, Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Health, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Nutritive Value, Obesity, Breakfast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review