The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nutritional Value and Health Benefits of Chickpeas and Hummus
Open accessAbstract
The 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans advocate for increasing vegetable intake and replacing energy-dense foods with those that are nutrient-dense. Most Americans do not eat enough vegetables, and particularly legumes, each day, despite their well-established benefits for health. Traditional hummus is a nutrient-dense dip or spread made from cooked, mashed chickpeas, blended with tahini, olive oil, lemon juice, and spices. Consumers of chickpeas and/or hummus have been shown to have higher nutrient intakes of dietary fiber, polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin A, vitamin E, vitamin C, folate, magnesium, potassium, and iron as compared to non-consumers. Hummus consumers have also been shown to have higher Healthy Eating Index 2005 (HEI-2005) scores. This may be, in part, due to hummus’ higher Naturally Nutrient Rich (NNR) score as compared to other dips and spreads. Emerging research suggests that chickpeas and hummus may play a beneficial role in weight management and glucose and insulin regulation, as well as have a positive impact on some markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Raw or cooked chickpeas and hummus also contain dietary bioactives such as phytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, and other polyphenols such as isoflavones, whose benefits may extend beyond basic nutrition requirements of humans. With chickpeas as its primary ingredient, hummus—and especially when paired with vegetables and/or whole grains—is a nutritious way for Americans to obtain their recommended servings of legumes. This manuscript reviews the nutritional value and health benefits of chickpeas and hummus and explores how these foods may help improve the nutrient profiles of meals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008
Atkinson, F. S., Foster-Powell, K., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-1239 · Cited by 1,965
Low-Carbohydrate-Diet Score and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women
Halton, T. L., Willett, W. C., Liu, S., Manson, J. E., Albert, C. M., Rexrode, K., & Hu, F. B. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055317 · Cited by 519
Legume and soy food intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Shanghai Women's Health Study
Villegas, R., Gao, Y.-T., Yang, G., Li, H.-L., Elasy, T. A., Zheng, W., & Shu, X. O. (2008) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.1.162 · Cited by 393
Bazzano, L. A., Thompson, A. M., Tees, M. T., Nguyen, C. H., & Winham, D. M. (2011) · Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2009.08.012 · Cited by 300
Mollard, R. C., Luhovyy, B. L., Panahi, S., Nunez, M., Hanley, A., & Anderson, G. H. (2012) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512000712 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Technological, processing and nutritional aspects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) - A review
Kaur, R., & Prasad, K. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.044 · Cited by 275
Gogna, S., Kaur, J., Sharma, K., Prasad, R., Singh, J., Bhadariya, V., Kumar, P., & Jarial, S. (2023) · Journal of the American Nutrition Association · doi:10.1080/27697061.2022.2103852 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, T., Murray, R., & Zelman, K.
- Venue
- Nutrients
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-11-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 766
- ISSN
- 2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2559463302
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.