CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

SPP toolbox: supporting sustainable public procurement in the context of socio-technical transitions

Open access
Cayolla Trindade, Paula, Antunes, Paula, Partidário, Paulo·2017·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su10010067
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Public procurement can shape production and consumption trends and represents a stimulus for both innovation and diversification in products and services, through a direct increase in demand. In recent years, the interest in demand-side policies has grown and several approaches have emerged, such as Green Public Procurement (GPP), Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) and Public Procurement of Innovation (PPI), representing strategic goals to be achieved through public procurement. In this context, there is a need to guide and support public organizations in the uptake of GPP, SPP and PPI practices. To respond to the challenges raised by the operationalization of such strategies, this paper proposes a new tool—the SPP Toolbox—for guiding public organizations as they re-think the procurement process, raising their ambitions and broadening their vision, thus changing the organizational approach towards culture, strategies, structures and practices. This toolbox integrates insights from GPP, SPP and PPI objectives and practices, in the context of the emergence of socio-technical transitions. The toolbox coherently links GPP, SPP and PPI, allowing flexibility in terms of goals, yet promoting an increasing complexity of institutionalized practices and skills—from GPP to SPP and then from SPP to PPI, organized in a framework fully integrated into the organizational strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su10010067

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of knowledge and experience of CPP in the public sector is the main barrier to implementation.

    “The lack of knowledge and experience of CPP in the public sector is the main barrier to implementation (Uyarra et al., 2014;Trindade et al., 2017;Vejaratnam et al., 2020).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Trindade et al., 2017

    The Introduction says limited uptake of GPP, SPP and PPI is linked in part to the greater in-house competencies required for procurement of innovation. The paper also lists lack of SPP awareness and training, but it does not identify lack of knowledge and experience as the main barrier to implementing CPP; it refers to circular procurement as CP without analyzing that barrier. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • To effectively contribute to sustainability, new procedures need to be integrated into organizational strategies.

    “To effectively contribute to sustainability, new procedures need to be integrated into organizational strategies, which then create cultural, managerial and operational change (Trindade et al., 2017).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Trindade et al., 2017

  • Integration of new procedures into organizational strategies creates cultural, managerial and operational change.

    “To effectively contribute to sustainability, new procedures need to be integrated into organizational strategies, which then create cultural, managerial and operational change (Trindade et al., 2017).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Trindade et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Testa, F.; Iraldo, F.; Frey, M.; Daddi, T. What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82, 88-96. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rolfstam, M. Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions. Sci. Public Policy 2009, 36, 349-360. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Rizzi, F.; Frey, M.; Testa, F.; Appolloni, A. Environmental value chain in green SME networks: The threat of the Abilene paradox. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 85, 265-275. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Testa, F.; Annunziata, E.; Iraldo, F.; Frey, M. Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: An effective tool for sustainable production. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1893-1900. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Deambrogio, E.; Allegretti, S.; Turi, P.; Zuccarello, F.; Lariccia, P.; Aghemo, C.; Pellegrino, A. Increase Sustainability in Buildings through Public Procurements: The PROLITE project for Lighting Retrofit in Schools. Energy Procedia 2017, 111, 328-337. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Amann, M.; Essig, M. Public procurement of innovation: Empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2015, 28, 282-292. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Edler, J.; Georghiou, L. Public procurement and innovation-Resurrecting the demand side. Res. Policy 2007, 36, 949-963. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Rolfstam, M. An institutional approach to research on public procurement of innovation. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2012, 25, 303-321. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Geels, F.W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2011, 1, 24-40. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  10. Smith, A.; Voß, J.P.; Grin, J. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Res. Policy 2010, 39, 435-448. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Trindade, P. Rethinking Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2018.
  12. Dale-Clough, L. Public procurement of innovation and local authority procurement: Procurement modes and framework conditions in three European cities. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2015, 28, 220-242. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Gee, S.; Uyarra, E. A role for public procurement in system innovation: The transformation of the Greater Manchester (UK) waste system. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2013, 25, 1175-1188. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Knutsson, H.; Thomasson, A. Innovation in the Public Procurement Process: A study of the creation of innovation-friendly public procurement. Public Manag. Rev. 2014, 16, 242-255. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Bratt, C.; Hallstedt, S.; Robèrt, K.H.; Broman, G.; Oldmark, J. Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 52, 309-316. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Timmermans, B.; Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. Coordinated unbundling: A way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation. Sci. Public Policy 2013, 40, 674-685. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Lember, V.; Kalvet, T.; Kattel, R. Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation. Urban Stud. 2011, 48, 1373-1395. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Uyarra, E.; Edler, J.; Garcia-Estevez, J.; Georghiou, L.; Yeow, J. Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation 2014, 34, 631-645. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  19. Preuss, L. Contribution of Purchasing and Supply Management to Ecological Innovation. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2007, 11, 515-537. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Uyarra, E.; Flanagan, K. Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2010, 18, 123-143. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Meehan, J.; Bryde, D. Sustainable Procurement Practice. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2011, 20, 94-106. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  22. McMeekin, A.; Southerton, D. Sustainability transitions and final consumption: Practices and socio-technical systems. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2012, 24, 345-361. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Raven, R. Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 2390-2400. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Geels, F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 2004, 33, 897-920. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  25. Raven, R.; Van den Bosch, S.; Weterings, R. Transitions and strategic niche management: Towards a competence kit for practitioners. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2010, 51, 57-74. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Jain, M.; Hoppe, T.; Bressers, H. Analyzing sectoral niche formation: The case of net-zero energy buildings in India. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 25, 47-63. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Edquist, C.; Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 1757-1769. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Meehan, J.; Bryde, D.J. Procuring sustainably in social housing: The role of social capital. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2014, 20, 74-81. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Preuss, L.; Walker, H. Psychological barriers in the road to sustainable development: Evidence from public sector procurement. Public Adm. 2011, 89, 493-521. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Georghiou, L.; Edler, J.; Uyarra, E.; Yeow, J. Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 86, 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  31. European Commission. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on Public Procurement and Repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2014, 2014, 65-242.
  32. Kemp, R.; Rip, A.; Schot, J.W. Constructing Transition Paths through the Management of Niches; Path Dependence and Creation; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 269-299.
  33. European Commission. GPP Training Toolkit: Module 1-Managing GPP Implementation; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; pp. 1-22.
  34. European Commission. Linking the Comprehensive GPP Management Cycle to Environmental Management Systems; Fact Sheet; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; pp. 1-4.
  35. Baxter, P.; Jack, S. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. Qual. Rep. 2008, 13, 544-559.
  36. Yin, R.K. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish, 1st ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-1-60623-701-4.
  37. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Sustainable Procurement in Government: Guidance to the Flexible Framework; Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs: London, UK, 2011; pp. 1-36.
  38. Scottish Government. Scottish Procurement Directorate Sustainable Procurement Action Plan for Scotland; Scottish Government: Edinburgh, UK, 2009; pp. 1-8.
  39. European Commission. Developing a Green Public Procurement Policy; Fact Sheet; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; pp. 1-7.
  40. Grandia, J. The role of change agents in sustainable public procurement projects. Public Money Manag. 2015, 35, 119-126. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Grandia, J. Finding the missing link: Examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 124, 183-190. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Smith, C.; Terman, J. Overcoming the Barriers to Green Procurement in the County: Interest Groups and Administrative Professionalism. J. Public Procure. 2016, 16, 259-285.
  43. Pelkonen, A.; Valovirta, V. Can service innovations be procured? An analysis of impacts and challenges in the procurement of innovation in social services. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2015, 28, 384-402. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Witjes, S.; Lozano, R. Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 112, 37-44. [CrossRef · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cayolla Trindade, P., Antunes, P., & Partidário, P.
Affiliations
  • LNEG—National Laboratory of Energy and Geology, I.P. Apartado 7586, Alfragide, 2610-999 Amadora, Portugal
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • DGEG-DEIR: Directorate General of Energy and Geology—Research and Renewables Division, Avenida 5 de Outubro 208, 1069-203 Lisboa, Portugal
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-12-28
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
67
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su10010067
OpenAlex
W2779045297
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PEst-OE/AMB/UI4085/2013, Strategic Project Pest‐OE/AMB/UI4085/2013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
sustainable public procurement, green public procurement, innovation procurement, socio-technical transitions, demand-side policy, public sector organizations, organizational strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review