Cited by 83Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

Unsustainable Working Conditions: The Association of Destructive Leadership, Use of Technology, and Workload with Workaholism and Exhaustion

Open access
Molino, Monica, Cortese, Claudio G., Ghislieri, Chiara·2019·Sustainability

Abstract

Job demands typical of the current working environments and negative leadership styles may be considered unsustainable factors able to decrease workers well-being. Moreover, contrary to the idea that workaholism is an innate individual characteristic, a recent perspective considers the working context able to foster its insurgence. In order to investigate unsustainable dynamics within organizations, this study aimed at examining whether (1) destructive leadership increases workload and supplemental work supported by technology, (2) the three job demands increases workaholism, and (3) workaholism mediates their relationship with exhaustion. A convenience sample of 432 workers filled in a self-report questionnaire. The structural equation model results showed a positive relationship between destructive leadership and workload, off-work hour Technology-Assisted Job Demand (off-TAJD), and workaholism. Moreover, both workload and off-TAJD partially mediated the relationship between destructive leadership and workaholism. Finally, workaholism was a mediator between the three demands and exhaustion. The study confirmed a positive association between job demands and workaholism, and, in turn, their association with exhaustion, highlighting in particular the role of two under-investigated determinants, namely destructive leadership and off-TAJD, as unsustainable working conditions. Despite limitations, above all the cross-sectional design, this study provided useful indications for research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11020446

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership can influence technostress indirectly by altering individual resources such as autonomy, workaholism, and recovery.

    “For instance, by altering individual resources like autonomy (Bartsch et al. 2021;Dolce et al. 2020), workaholism (Molino et al. 2019), and recovery (Dolce et al. 2020).”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Molino et al. 2019

    The Abstract and Discussion report that destructive leadership is associated with workaholism, and that workaholism mediates its relationship with exhaustion. This supports the workaholism portion attributed to Molino et al., but the paper does not establish workaholism as a pathway from leadership to technostress. The other cited resources, autonomy and recovery, are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Destructive leadership enhances off-work hour technology-assisted job demands.

    “Destructive leadership enhances off-work hour technology-assisted job demands.Workload fully mediated the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.The effect of destructive leadership, workload, and off-work hour technology-assisted job demands on exhaustion was mediated by workaholism”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Molino et al. (2019)

    The Results report a significant positive association between destructive leadership and off-work hours technology-assisted job demand (off-TAJD). The Discussion says destructive leadership may increase employees’ perception of requests to work outside normal hours, but the claim’s unqualified “enhances” implies a causal effect that the paper does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Workload fully mediates the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.

    “Destructive leadership enhances off-work hour technology-assisted job demands.Workload fully mediated the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.The effect of destructive leadership, workload, and off-work hour technology-assisted job demands on exhaustion was mediated by workaholism”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Molino et al. (2019)

    The Results report that workload fully mediated the relationship between destructive leadership and exhaustion (β = 0.10, p < 0.05). However, the Measures section identifies the outcome as exhaustion measured with the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory; it does not establish that the modeled outcome was specifically emotional exhaustion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effect of destructive leadership, workload, and off-work hour technology-assisted job demands on exhaustion is mediated by workaholism.

    “Destructive leadership enhances off-work hour technology-assisted job demands.Workload fully mediated the relationship between destructive leadership and emotional exhaustion.The effect of destructive leadership, workload, and off-work hour technology-assisted job demands on exhaustion was mediated by workaholism”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Molino et al. (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Vodanovich, S.J.; Piotrowski, C. Workaholism: A critical but neglected factor in OD. Organ. Dev. J. 2006, 24, 55-60.
  2. Piotrowski, C.; Vodanovich, S.J. The interface between workaholism and work-family conflict. Organ. Dev. J. 2006, 24, 84-91.
  3. Bass, B.M. Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  4. Ashkanasy, N.M., Härtel, C.E., Zerbe, W.J., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2016; pp. 3-34.
  5. Molino, M. Workaholism: Definitions, Measures, and Dynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Turin, Turin, Italy, 2013.
  6. Conway, J.M. Method variance and method bias in I/O psychology. In Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Rogelberg, S.G., Ed.; Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 344-365.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., & Ghislieri, C.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Cortese, Claudio G.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-16
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
446
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908901600
Cited by
83
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
destructive leadership, workaholism, exhaustion, workload, job demands, employee well-being, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review