Cited by 20Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisAlgal biology and biofuel production

Altered Carbon Partitioning Enhances CO2 to Terpene Conversion in Cyanobacteria

Open access
Li, Man, Long, Bin, Dai, Susie Y., Golden, James W., Wang, Xin, Yuan, Joshua S.·2022·BioDesign Research

Abstract

Photosynthetic terpene production represents one of the most carbon and energy-efficient routes for converting CO2 into hydrocarbon. In photosynthetic organisms, metabolic engineering has led to limited success in enhancing terpene productivity, partially due to the low carbon partitioning. In this study, we employed systems biology analysis to reveal the strong competition for carbon substrates between primary metabolism (e.g., sucrose, glycogen, and protein synthesis) and terpene biosynthesis in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. We then engineered key “source” and “sink” enzymes. The “source” limitation was overcome by knocking out either sucrose or glycogen biosynthesis to significantly enhance limonene production via altered carbon partitioning. Moreover, a fusion enzyme complex with geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS) and limonene synthase (LS) was designed to further improve pathway kinetics and substrate channeling. The synergy between “source” and “sink” achieved a limonene titer of 21.0 mg/L. Overall, the study demonstrates that balancing carbon flux between primary and secondary metabolism can be an effective approach to enhance terpene bioproduction in cyanobacteria. The design of “source” and “sink” synergy has significant potential in improving natural product yield in photosynthetic species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.34133/2022/9897425

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cyanobacteria, carbon fixed through the Calvin cycle is typically allocated toward biomass production, including carbohydrate synthesis, amino acid formation, and cellular maintenance.

    “In cyanobacteria, carbon fixed through the Calvin cycle is typically allocated toward biomass production, including carbohydrate synthesis, amino acid formation, and cellular maintenance [170].”

    From Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression (2026) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Discussion (section 4) describes carbon partitioning into primary metabolism, including amino acid and carbohydrate biosynthesis. The Results (section 3.2) link an amino-acid precursor to the Calvin–Benson cycle and report photosynthate partitioning toward storage carbon. The paper does not establish the broader claim that Calvin-cycle carbon is typically allocated toward biomass production, including cellular maintenance. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]C. Halfmann, L. P. Gu, and R. B. Zhou, “ Engineering cyanobacteria for the production of a cyclic hydrocarbon fuel from CO2 and H2O,” Green Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3175– 3185, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Long, B., Dai, S. Y., Golden, J. W., Wang, X., & Yuan, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Miami University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Xin
  • Yuan, Joshua S.
Venue
BioDesign Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
Volume
2022
Pages
9897425
ISSN
2693-1257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211195938
Cited by
20
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioDesign Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Texas A&M University
  • Texas A&M AgriLife Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
Keywords
carbon allocation, Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, sucrose synthesis, glycogen synthesis, geranyl diphosphate synthase, limonene synthase, fusion enzyme, substrate channeling, primary and secondary metabolism, metabolic engineering, CO2 conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review