Cited by 7Psychology of Social InfluenceJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

促进型和抑制型建言的差异

Open access
LI, Fangjun, ZHONG, Xupeng·2020·Advances in Psychological Science

Abstract

摘要:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.01939

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 张跃, 杨旭华, 陈娜. (2018). 职业召唤对建言行为的影响 机制研究. 中国人力资源开发, 35(9), 40-50.
  2. Arain, G. A., Hameed, I., & Crawshaw, J. R. (2019). Servant leadership and follower voice: The roles of follower felt responsibility for constructive change and avoidance-approach motivation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 555-565.
  3. Beehr, T. A., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990). Social support and occupational stress: Talking to supervisors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36(1), 61-81.
  4. Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851-875.
  5. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
  6. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
  7. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
  8. Li, F., Li, A., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Employee work experience, locomotion, and voice behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(11), 1851-1862.
  9. Li, G., Kark, R., & Morrison, E. W. (2017). Voicing up: How team voice shapes leaders regulatory focus and behaviors. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), doi:10.5465/ AMBPP.2017. · DOI
  10. Mayfield, J. R., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Raise their voices: The link between motivating language and employee voice. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), doi:10.5465/ AMBPP.2017.13015abstract · DOI
  11. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
  12. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
  13. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  14. Shin, D., Woodwark, M. J., & Jung, Y. (2017). Employee voice human resource management practices and organizational innovative performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2017. · DOI
  15. Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2019). Echoes of corporate social responsibility: How and when does CSR influence employees' promotive and prohibitive voices? Journal of Business Ethics, 1-17.
  16. Xie, X. Y., Ling, C. D., Mo, S. J., & Luan, K. (2015). Linking colleague support to employees' promotive voice: A moderated mediation model. PloS One, 10(7), 22-33.
  17. Zhang, M. J., Ling, C. D., Xie, X., & Liu, W. (2017). Different forms of voice lead to different outcomes: An investigation of team-level voice. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2017. · DOI
  18. Zhang, Z., Liang, Q., & Li, J. (2017). Why and when does employee voice evoke leader receptivity? A social persuasion perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2017. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LI, F., & ZHONG, X.
Affiliations
Jinan University (CN)
Venue
Advances in Psychological Science
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1939-1952
ISSN
1671-3710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088383606
Cited by
7
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
advice-giving, advice acceptance, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review