Cited by 119Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLabor Movements and UnionsOccupational Health and Safety Research

The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice.

Open access
Kakkar, Hemant, Tangirala, Subrahmaniam, Srivastava, Nalin K., Kamdar, Dishan·2016·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

We propose that promotive voice, or the expression of suggestions for improving work practices in the organization, and prohibitive voice, or the expression of warnings about factors that can harm the organization, are differentially influenced by employees' dispositional inclination to be approach and avoidance oriented. Drawing on multisource survey data from 291 employees and their managers, we found that approach orientation had positive relationship with promotive voice and negative relationship with prohibitive voice. By contrast, avoidance orientation had positive relationship with prohibitive voice and negative relationship with promotive voice. Further, voice role expectations, or employees' beliefs about the extent to which a particular form of voice is expected from them in their daily work, moderated the effects of approach and avoidance orientations. Highlighting the unique nature of voice as a behavior that is especially sensitive to situational cues, the effects of approach and avoidance orientations on promotive and prohibitive voice were stronger when role expectations for that form of voice were weaker. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000130

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic Link to APA Copy of Record: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000130 © 2016 American Psychological Association 'This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.' principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 444-463. · DOI
  2. McClelland, D. C. (1951). Measuring motivation in phantasy: The achievement motive. In Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 191-205). Oxford, England: Carnegie Press.
  3. Morrison, E. W., & Rothman, N. B. (2009). Silence and the dynamics of power. In Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 111-134). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
  4. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (n.d.). 1998-2010. Mplus user's guide, 6th (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kakkar, H., Tangirala, S., Srivastava, N. K., & Kamdar, D.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Indian School of Business (IN)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2016
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
1342-1351
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2420982224
Cited by
119
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Eprints Services at ISB (DESI) (Indian School of Business) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
Keywords
promotive voice, prohibitive voice, employee voice, avoidance orientation, moderating effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review