Cited by 444Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Science and Education ResearchClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 236 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

Open access

Osman, Magda·2004·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

DOI 10.3758/bf03196730

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Current theories propose that reasoning comprises two underlying systems (Evans & Over, 1996; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000). The systems are identified as having functionally distinct roles, differ according to the type of information encoded, vary according to the level of expressible knowledge, and result in different responses. This article evaluates the arguments and the evidence from a select number of key tasks that have been supportive of dual-reasoning theorists' proposals. The review contrasts the dualist approach with a single-system framework that conjectures that different types of reasoning arise through the graded properties of the representations that are utilized while reasoning, and the different functional roles that consciousness has in cognition. The article concludes by arguing in favor of the alternative framework, which attempts to unify thedifferent forms of reasoning identified by dual-process theorists under a single system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196730

Cites

236 of 236 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
The Principles of Psychology
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
Freud, S. (1953) · Cited by 17,730
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“There are mixed views on the credibility of data gathered from protocols: Nisbett and Wilson (1977) consider them to be an unreliable source of support for implicit processes, but Ericsson and Simon (1980) suggest that protocols are a valid way of demonstrating dissociations between implicit and…”
Background
Untitled work
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
2. The Interpretation of Dreams
Freud, S., Crick, J., & Robertson, R. (1913) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10561-000 · Cited by 6,979

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 243 references

7 of the 243 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Benassi, V. A., &Knoth, R. L. (1993). The intractable conjunction fallacy: Statistical sophistication, instructional set, and training.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,8, 83–96.
Berry, D., &Dienes, Z. (1993).Implicit learning. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. S. B. T. Evans (Eds.),Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 91–114). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Margolis, H. (1987).Patterns, thinking, and cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, H. (2000). Wason’s selection task with a reduced array [On line]. {Psycoloquy},11 (5).
Over, D., &Evans, J. S. B. T. (1997). Two cheers for deductive competence.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 255–278.
Roberts, M. J. (1997). On dichotomies and deductive reasoning research.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 196–204.
Stenning, K., &van Lambalgen, M. (1999). Is psychology hard or impossible? Reflections on the conditional. In M. M. J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, & Y. Venema (Eds.),Liber amicorum for Johan van Benthem’s 50th birthday (pp. 1–29). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Deductive reasoning and the distinction between implicit and explicit processes.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 222–229.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 441

Are emotions to blame? — The impact of non-analytical information processing on decision-making and implications for fostering sustainability
Menzel, S. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.001 · Cited by 49
The dual-process turn: How recent defenses of dual-process theories of reasoning fail
Mugg, J. (2015) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2015.1078458 · Cited by 43
Positive transfer and negative transfer/antilearning of problem-solving skills.
Osman, M. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.97 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Attachment to artificial intelligence: Development of the AI Attachment Scale, construct validation, and the psychological mechanisms of Human–AI attachment
Kasturiratna, K. T. A. S., & Hartanto, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100912 · Cited by 45
The Multipurpose Enhanced Cognitive Architecture (MECA)
Gudwin, R., Paraense, A. L. O., de Paula, S. M., Froes, E. D. M., Gibaut, W., Castro, E., Figueiredo, V. L. X., & Raizer, K. (2017) · Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures · doi:10.1016/j.bica.2017.09.006 · Cited by 39
Spot the difference: distinguishing between two kinds of processing
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2012) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-012-0104-2 · Cited by 38
The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief–logic conflict
Howarth, S., Handley, S. J., & Walsh, C. R. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0555-x · Cited by 38
Quasirational models of sentencing.
Dhami, M. K., Belton, I., & Goodman‐Delahunty, J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.009 · Cited by 39
A new challenge to conceptual engineering
Machery, É. (2021) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2021.1967190 · Cited by 37
Interactionism and Mindreading
Michael, J. (2011) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0066-z · Cited by 37
Acquisition of dental skills in preclinical technique courses: influence of spatial and manual abilities
Schwibbe, A., Kothe, C., Hampe, W., & Konradt, U. (2016) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9670-0 · Cited by 34
Cognitive Predictors of Precautionary Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Thoma, V., Weiss‐Cohen, L., Filkuková, P., & Ayton, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589800 · Cited by 38
Contemporary Theories of Intelligence
Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Plucker, J. A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0051 · Cited by 36
Better Government, Better Science: The Promise of and Challenges Facing the Evidence-Informed Policy Movement
Bowers, J., & Testa, P. F. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-124041 · Cited by 35
Decision making: rational or hedonic?
Cabanac, M., & Bonniot‐Cabanac, M. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-45 · Cited by 33
Cognitive abilities affect decision errors but not risk preferences: A meta-analysis
Mechera‐Ostrovsky, T., Heinke, S., Andraszewicz, S., & Rieskamp, J. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02053-1 · Cited by 39
The TROCA Project: An autonomous transportation robot controlled by a cognitive architecture
Gudwin, R., Rohmer, E., Paraense, A. L. O., Froes, E. D. M., Gibaut, W., Oliveira, I., Rocha, S., Raizer, K., & Feljan, A. V. (2019) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.011 · Cited by 31
A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning
Stephens, R. G., Dunn, J. C., Hayes, B. K., & Kalish, M. L. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104223 · Cited by 31
System 1 vs. System 2 Thinking
Silva, S. D. (2023) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych5040071 · Cited by 41
Kahneman's Failed Revolution Against Economic Orthodoxy
Buturović, Ž., & Tasic, S. (2015) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2015.1068512 · Cited by 30
Rethinking fast and slow processing in autism.
Taylor, E., Farmer, G., Livingston, L. A., Callan, M. J., & Shah, P. (2022) · Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science · doi:10.1037/abn0000734 · Cited by 30
The information inelasticity of habits: Kahneman’s bounded rationality or Simon’s procedural rationality?
Khalil, E. L. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03815-7 · Cited by 33
Heuristics, Biases and the Psychology of Reasoning: State of the Art
Martín, M., & García, M. D. V. (2023) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2023.142016 · Cited by 33
Disappearing dissociations in experimental psychology: Using state-trace analysis to test for multiple processes
Stephens, R. G., Matzke, D., & Hayes, B. K. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.11.003 · Cited by 31
Psychological protective factors mediate the relationship between decision-making styles and mental health
Bavoľár, J., & Bačíková-Slešková, M. (2018) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9831-9 · Cited by 34
Mapping out past and future minds: The perceived trajectory of rationality versus emotionality over time.
O’Brien, E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000064 · Cited by 30
How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability
Feeney, A. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193513 · Cited by 28
Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning
Godden, D. (2015) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v35i2.4124 · Cited by 27
When Intuitive Decisions Making, Based on Expertise, May Deliver Better Results than a Rational, Deliberate Approach
Maldonato, M. N., Dell’Orco, S., & Sperandeo, R. (2017) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56904-8_35 · Cited by 27
Ideological belief bias with political syllogisms
Calvillo, D. P., Swan, A. B., & Rutchick, A. M. (2019) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1688188 · Cited by 30
Debiasing System 1: Training favours logical over stereotypical intuiting
Boissin, E., Caparos, S., Voudouri, A., & Neys, W. D. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008895 · Cited by 34
Many a little makes a mickle: Why do consumers negatively react to sequential price disclosure?
Totzek, D., & Jurgensen, G. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21426 · Cited by 26
How Behavioral Economics and Nudges Could Help Diminish Irrationality in Suicide-Related Decisions
Bauer, B. W., & Capron, D. W. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619866463 · Cited by 26
“Judging a Book by Its Cover”: The Dominance of Delivery Over Content When Perceiving Charisma
Caspi, A., Bogler, R., & Tzuman, O. (2019) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601119835982 · Cited by 28
The differential effects of age and first grade schooling on the development of infralogical and logico-mathematical concrete operations
Cahan, S., Greenbaum, C. W., Artman, L., Deluya, N., & Gappel-Gilon, Y. (2008) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.01.004 · Cited by 25
Philosophical intuitions, heuristics, and metaphors
Fischer, E. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0292-2 · Cited by 24
More than words: Rethinking sustainability communications through neuroscientific methods
Ćirović, M. D., Dimitriadis, N., Janić, M., Alevizou, P., & Dimitriadis, N. J. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2125 · Cited by 24
A cognitive model fleshes out Kahneman’s fast and slow systems
Faghihi, U., Estey, C., McCall, R. J., & Franklin, S. (2014) · Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures · doi:10.1016/j.bica.2014.11.014 · Cited by 28
An Overview of the Multipurpose Enhanced Cognitive Architecture (MECA)
Gudwin, R., Paraense, A. L. O., de Paula, S. M., Froes, E. D. M., Gibaut, W., Castro, E., Figueiredo, V. L. X., & Raizer, K. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.025 · Cited by 23
Decision Making Across Adulthood
Strough, J., & de Bruin, W. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051120-010038 · Cited by 28
Threats to student evaluative judgement and their management
Joughin, G., Boud, D. J., & Dawson, P. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1544227 · Cited by 25
Psychological Effects and Their Role in Online Privacy Interactions: A Review
Kitkowska, A., Shulman, Y., Martucci, L. A., & Wästlund, E. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2969562 · Cited by 26
Functions represented as linear sequential data: relationships between presentation and student responses
Ayalon, M., Watson, A., & Lerman, S. (2015) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9628-9 · Cited by 22
Decision-making, cognition, and aphasia: developing a foundation for future discussions and inquiry
Suleman, S., & Kim, E. (2015) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1049584 · Cited by 22
Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others
McManus, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04286-6 · Cited by 27
The best of both worlds: Dual systems of reasoning in animals and AI
Kelly, M., & Barron, A. B. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105118 · Cited by 25
Dual Process Theory for Large Language Models: An overview of using Psychology to address hallucination and reliability issues
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2023) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/10597123231206604 · Cited by 25
Trait emotional intelligence facilitates responses to a social gambling task
Telle, N.-T., Senior, C., & Butler, M. J. R. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.010 · Cited by 26
Erroneous gambling-related beliefs emerge from broader beliefs during problem-solving: a critical review and classification scheme
Ejova, A., & Ohtsuka, K. (2019) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1590233 · Cited by 22
Trust Responsibly
Ohlhorst, J. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003374466 · Cited by 21
Historical context of behavioral economics
Rehman, T. U. (2016) · Intellectual Economics · doi:10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.006 · Cited by 21
Dual Process Theory: Systems, Types, Minds, Modes, Kinds or Metaphors? A Critical Review
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2017) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0376-x · Cited by 21
The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions
Markovits, H., de Chantal, P., Brisson, J., & Gagnon‐St‐Pierre, É. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00927-3 · Cited by 21
Numerals as triggers of System 1 and System 2 in the ‘bat and ball’ problem
Mastrogiorgio, A., & Petracca, E. (2014) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-014-0138-8 · Cited by 21
Correction: Biased but in Doubt: Conflict and Decision Confidence
Neys, W. D., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/1ebd8050-5513-426f-8399-201773755683 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Dual process frameworks on reasoning and linguistic discourse
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., & Long, H. (2020) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.70.02hei · Cited by 20
Analytic thinking outruns fluid reasoning in explaining rejection of pseudoscience, paranormal, and conspiracist beliefs
Jastrzębski, J., & Chuderski, A. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101705 · Cited by 23
A meta-theoretical framework for organizing and integrating theory and research on motivation for health-related behavior
Williams, D. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130813 · Cited by 22
Single- and Dual-Process Models of Biased Contingency Detection
Vadillo, M. A., Blanco, F., Yarritu, I., & Matute, H. (2016) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000309 · Cited by 20
Psychometric Properties of Rational-Experiential Inventory for Adolescents
Shirzadifard, M., Shahghasemi, E., Hejazi, E., Naghsh, Z., & Ranjbar, G. (2018) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018767219 · Cited by 20
The parallelism of cognitive economy and physiological economy: A rationality-based dual process theory
Khalil, E. L., & Amin, A. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03554-5 · Cited by 23
The Craving and Excitement of Social Networking Sites Addicts: Based on Cue-Reactivity
Leng, Y., He, X., Zhu, B., Li, P., Xiao, C., & He, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01717 · Cited by 20
Complexity analysis of the brain activity in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) due to cognitive loads/demands induced by Aristotle's type of syllogism/reasoning. A Power Spectral Density and multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis
Papaioannou, A. G., Kalantzi, E., Papageorgiou, C. C., Korombili, K., Βokou, A., Pehlivanidis, A., Papageorgiou, C., & Papaioannou, G. P. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07984 · Cited by 23
Expert Intuition
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136419.013 · Cited by 20
Human Reasoning
Over, D. E., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009495349 · Cited by 19
Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory
Rumana, A. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2047106 · Cited by 19
Reasoning and Problem Solving
Leighton, J. P., & Sternberg, R. J. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop204023 · Cited by 19
Beyond thinking fast and slow: a Bayesian intuitionist model of clinical reasoning in real-world practice
Ng, I. K., Goh, W. G. W., & Lim, T. K. (2024) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2024-0169 · Cited by 18
Conscious Will, Reason-Responsiveness, and Moral Responsibility
Schlosser, M. E. (2013) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-013-9143-0 · Cited by 18
To detect or not to detect: A replication and extension of the three-stage model
Swan, A. B., Calvillo, D. P., & Revlin, R. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.003 · Cited by 18
De-idealising the educational ideal of critical thinking
Pettersson, H. (2020) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878520981303 · Cited by 18
If you think about it more, do you want it more? The case of fairtrade
Konopka, R., Wright, M., Avis, M., & Feetham, P. M. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2018-0072 · Cited by 17
Prospective Observational Study on the Prevalence and Diagnostic Value of General Practitioners’ Gut Feelings for Cancer and Serious Diseases
Oliva-Fanlo, B., March, S., Gadea-Ruiz, C., Stolper, E. C. F., Esteva, M., & On behalf of the CORap group (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07352-w · Cited by 17
Causally efficacious intentions and the sense of agency: In defense of real mental causation.
Schlosser, M. E. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027618 · Cited by 19
Teaching Psychology for Sustainability: The Why and How
Koger, S. M., & Scott, B. A. (2016) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725716648238 · Cited by 17
Survey evidence on core factors of behavioral biases
Rieger, M. O., Wang, M., Huang, P.-K., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101912 · Cited by 16
Unpacking workplace stress and forensic expert decision-making: From theory to practice
Almazrouei, M. A., Kukucka, J., Morgan, R. M., & Levy, I. (2024) · Forensic Science International Synergy · doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100473 · Cited by 16
The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies
von Sydow, M. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.12.001 · Cited by 16
Dual Process Theories: Computing Cognition in Context
Robins, A. V. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3487055 · Cited by 15
Online Decision-Making in Receiving Spam Emails Among College Students
Yan, Z., & Gözü, H. (2012) · International Journal of Cyber Behavior Psychology and Learning · doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2012010101 · Cited by 15
Defining deliberation for dual-process models of reasoning
Neys, W. D. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00466-6 · Cited by 14
Gaze patterns disclose the link between cognitive reflection and sophistication in strategic interaction
Zonca, J., Coricelli, G., & Polonio, L. (2020) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500007373 · Cited by 14
Consumers’ responses to product design: Using a Semantic Priming Task to assess automatic understanding of product positioning
Belboula, I., Ackermann, C.-L., Mathieu, J., & Cuny, C. (2018) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785318777429 · Cited by 14
Mediation effect of emotions on relational dynamics between entrepreneurs’ thinking processes and their entrepreneurial decision-making
Sanda, M.-A., & Sallama, M.-N. (2023) · Journal of the International Council for Small Business · doi:10.1080/26437015.2022.2156312 · Cited by 13
Causal conjunction fallacies: The roles of causal strength and mental resources
Crisp, A. K., & Feeney, A. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902783638 · Cited by 13
The influence of conflict monitoring on meta-reasoning and response times in a base rate task
Dujmović, M., & Valerjev, P. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021817746924 · Cited by 13
Reasoning strategy modulates gender differences in performance on a spatial rotation task
Markovits, H. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819867203 · Cited by 13
Don’t Accept All and Continue: Exploring Nudges for More Deliberate Interaction with Tracking Consent Notices
Gerber, N., Stöver, A., Peschke, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3617363 · Cited by 12
Intuition in Mathematical and Probabilistic Reasoning
Morsanyi, K., & Szűcs, D. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.016 · Cited by 12
Modeling individual differences in contrapositive reasoning with continuous latent state and trait variables
Bonnefon, J., Vautier, S., & Eid, M. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.017 · Cited by 12
Selection of strategies in judgment-based effort estimation
Jørgensen, M. (2010) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.12.028 · Cited by 12
Technical Analysis as a Rational Tool of Decision Making for Professional Traders
Kubińska, E. A., Czupryna, M., Markiewicz, Ł., & Czekaj, J. (2016) · Emerging Markets Finance and Trade · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2016.1217004 · Cited by 12
Gaze data reveal individual differences in relational representation processes.
Zonca, J., Coricelli, G., & Polonio, L. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000723 · Cited by 11
The effect of rational-experiential thinking style on stock-flow performance: The mediating role of cognitive reflection
Hendijani, R., Ghafourian, F., & Attari, I. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01459-3 · Cited by 11
Decision Making in Obstetric Anesthesia
Minehart, R. D., & Katz, D. (2021) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2021.08.013 · Cited by 11
Three cognitive routes to atheism: a dual-process account
Kalkman, D. P. (2014) · Religion · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2013.841110 · Cited by 11
What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks
Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L. A. G., Krijkamp, A. R., & Provan, K. G. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1180 · Cited by 11
The normative and descriptive weaknesses of behavioral economics-informed nudge: depowered paternalism and unjustified libertarianism
Viale, R. (2018) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-019-00207-2 · Cited by 12
Interaction between habits as action sequences and goal-directed behavior under time pressure
Frölich, S., Esmeyer, M., Endraß, T., Smolka, M. N., & Kiebel, S. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.996957 · Cited by 10
A levels of processing interpretation of dual-system theories of judgment and decision making
Arkes, H. R. (2016) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354316642878 · Cited by 11

Authors: Osman, M.
Affiliations: University College London (GB)
Corresponding author: Osman, Magda
ORCID: Osman, Magda
Venue: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2004-12
Volume: 11
Issue: 6
Pages: 988-1010
ISSN: 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
1531-5320
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196730
OpenAlex: W2022112401
Cited by: 444
References: 243
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 13
FWCI: 3.84
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Economic and Social Research Council
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords: dual-process theory, reasoning, dual-process models, representational properties
MeSH terms: Humans, Models, Psychological, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks