Cited by 444Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Science and Education ResearchClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 236 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

Open access

Osman, Magda·2004·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

DOI 10.3758/bf03196730

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Current theories propose that reasoning comprises two underlying systems (Evans & Over, 1996; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000). The systems are identified as having functionally distinct roles, differ according to the type of information encoded, vary according to the level of expressible knowledge, and result in different responses. This article evaluates the arguments and the evidence from a select number of key tasks that have been supportive of dual-reasoning theorists' proposals. The review contrasts the dualist approach with a single-system framework that conjectures that different types of reasoning arise through the graded properties of the representations that are utilized while reasoning, and the different functional roles that consciousness has in cognition. The article concludes by arguing in favor of the alternative framework, which attempts to unify thedifferent forms of reasoning identified by dual-process theorists under a single system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196730

Cites

236 of 236 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
The Principles of Psychology
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
Freud, S. (1953) · Cited by 17,730
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“There are mixed views on the credibility of data gathered from protocols: Nisbett and Wilson (1977) consider them to be an unreliable source of support for implicit processes, but Ericsson and Simon (1980) suggest that protocols are a valid way of demonstrating dissociations between implicit and…”
Background
Untitled work
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
2. The Interpretation of Dreams
Freud, S., Crick, J., & Robertson, R. (1913) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10561-000 · Cited by 6,979

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 243 references

7 of the 243 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Benassi, V. A., &Knoth, R. L. (1993). The intractable conjunction fallacy: Statistical sophistication, instructional set, and training.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,8, 83–96.
Berry, D., &Dienes, Z. (1993).Implicit learning. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. S. B. T. Evans (Eds.),Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 91–114). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Margolis, H. (1987).Patterns, thinking, and cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, H. (2000). Wason’s selection task with a reduced array [On line]. {Psycoloquy},11 (5).
Over, D., &Evans, J. S. B. T. (1997). Two cheers for deductive competence.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 255–278.
Roberts, M. J. (1997). On dichotomies and deductive reasoning research.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 196–204.
Stenning, K., &van Lambalgen, M. (1999). Is psychology hard or impossible? Reflections on the conditional. In M. M. J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, & Y. Venema (Eds.),Liber amicorum for Johan van Benthem’s 50th birthday (pp. 1–29). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Deductive reasoning and the distinction between implicit and explicit processes.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 222–229.

Sorted by citations

Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,756
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569 · Cited by 844
Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test
Cokely, E. T., Galešić, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & García‐Retamero, R. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001819 · Cited by 772
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020762 · Cited by 796
Intuition, reason, and metacognition
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001 · Cited by 709
A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model
Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., Stock, M. L., & Pomery, E. A. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.10.001 · Cited by 772
Two Is Not Always Better Than One
Keren, G. B., & Schul, Y. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x · Cited by 733
The secret life of fluency
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 · Cited by 745
Dual Processing in Reasoning
Neys, W. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x · Cited by 564
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001 · Cited by 508
Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking
Neys, W. D., & Glumicic, T. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002 · Cited by 441
The Mythical Number Two
Melnikoff, D. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001 · Cited by 432
Intuition and Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2010.521057 · Cited by 385
How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0002 · Cited by 332
Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in general and hospital population of Dominican Republic
García-Batista, Z. E., Guerra-Peña, K., Cano-Vindel, A., Herrera-Martínez, S. X., & Medrano, L. A. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199750 · Cited by 240
Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging
Marchiori, D. R., Adriaanse, M. A., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12297 · Cited by 237
Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four‐Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences
Kaufman, S. B. (2013) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.33 · Cited by 229
Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis.
Phillips, W. J., Fletcher, J., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000027 · Cited by 224
The Good Politician
Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J., & Stoker, G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108641357 · Cited by 216
Biased but in Doubt: Conflict and Decision Confidence
Neys, W. D., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015954 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-011-0093-6 · Cited by 226
Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain ‘social distancing’ in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles
Bonell, C., Michie, S., Reicher, S., West, R., Bear, L., Yardley, L., Curtis, V., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214290 · Cited by 195
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking
Neys, W. D. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x2200142x · Cited by 214
The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003 · Cited by 202
The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity
Forman, E. M., Butryn, M. L., Juarascio, A. S., Bradley, L. E., Lowe, M. R., Herbert, J. D., & Shaw, J. A. (2013) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.20169 · Cited by 182
Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics
Lin, Y., Osman, M., & Ashcroft, R. E. (2017) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304 · Cited by 180
Self-citation
Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2019) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1623071 · Cited by 179
Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults
Vamvakoussi, X., Dooren, W. V., & Verschaffel, L. (2012) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.02.001 · Cited by 178
How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes
Horstmann, N. D., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001182 · Cited by 177
Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25
Shanks, D. R. (2007) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210601000581 · Cited by 184
Intuitive and reflective inferences
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0007 · Cited by 169
Multiple Systems in Decision Making
Sanfey, A. G., & Chang, L. J. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1399.007 · Cited by 169
Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach
Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546781003630117 · Cited by 155
Climate adaptation heuristics and the science/policy divide
Preston, B. L., Nalau, J., & Maloney, M. C. (2013) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9503-x · Cited by 165
Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expert
Mamede, S., Schmidt, H. G., Rikers, R. M. J. P., Custers, E. J. F. M., Splinter, T. A. W., & van Saase, J. L. C. M. (2010) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0281-8 · Cited by 148
Nudge plus: incorporating reflection into behavioral public policy
Banerjee, S., & John, P. C. (2021) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.6 · Cited by 147
The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking
Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A., & Neys, W. D. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381 · Cited by 135
Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review
Grayot, J. D. (2019) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9 · Cited by 150
In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making
Bonner, C., & Newell, B. R. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.2.186 · Cited by 132
Decision‐making heuristics and biases across the life span
Strough, J., Karns, T. E., & Schlosnagle, L. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06208.x · Cited by 138
On Dual- and Single-Process Models of Thinking
Neys, W. D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620964172 · Cited by 142
Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution
Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20449 · Cited by 125
Development and Assessment of A Diagnostic Tool to Identify Organic Chemistry Students’ Alternative Conceptions Related to Acid Strength
McClary, L., & Bretz, S. L. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.684433 · Cited by 123
Variations in decision-making profiles by age and gender: A cluster-analytic approach
Delaney, R. K., Strough, J., Parker, A. M., & de Bruin, W. B. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.034 · Cited by 134
A Tale of Two Systems
Keren, G. B. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613483474 · Cited by 122
Reasoning and Bias: Heuristics in Safety Assessment and Placement Decisions for Children at Risk
Enosh, G., & Bayer-Topilsky, T. (2014) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct213 · Cited by 112
Heuristic Reasoning in Chemistry: Making decisions about acid strength
McClary, L., & Talanquer, V. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.528463 · Cited by 111
Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.
Newman, I. R., Gibb, M., & Thompson, V. A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000372 · Cited by 110
Dual-Process Theories of Deductive Reasoning: Facts and Fallacies
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0008 · Cited by 108
Multiple Systems in Decision Making
Frank, M. J., Cohen, M. X., & Sanfey, A. G. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01612.x · Cited by 110
How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modesPreprint
Horstmann, N. D., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 108
A DUAL‐SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PROCESSES OF PEER INFLUENCE
Thomas, K. J., & McGloin, J. M. (2013) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12010 · Cited by 101
Fast thinking: Implications for democratic politics
Stoker, G., Hay, C., & Barr, M. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12113 · Cited by 103
Diagnostic Reasoning: Where We've Been, Where We’re Going
Monteiro, S., & Norman, G. R. (2013) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2013.842911 · Cited by 98
On the Universality of Argumentative Reasoning
Mercier, H. (2011) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/156853711x568707 · Cited by 97
The role of intuition in entrepreneurship and business venturing decisions
Sadler‐Smith, E. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1029046 · Cited by 99
Aging and Decision Making
Heß, T., Strough, J., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-05180-8 · Cited by 91
The Nudge Puzzle
Zimmermann, V., & Renaud, K. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3429888 · Cited by 88
Nonconscious Goal Pursuit in Novel Environments
Eitam, B., Hassin, R. R., & Schul, Y. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02078.x · Cited by 84
Philosophy's New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action
Pinillos, N. Á., Smith, N., NAIR, G. S., Marchetto, P. M., & Mun, C. (2011) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01412.x · Cited by 87
Medical Education and Cognitive Continuum Theory
Custers, E. J. F. M. (2013) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31829a3b10 · Cited by 84
Only One? The Default Interventionist Perspective as a Unimodel—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013)
Kruglanski, A. W. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613483477 · Cited by 91
Reasoning Under Time Pressure
Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Bacon, A. M. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.77 · Cited by 81
Reflection in Medical Diagnosis: A Literature Review
Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017) · Health Professions Education · doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2017.01.003 · Cited by 78
Independence and dependence in human causal reasoning
Rehder, B. (2014) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.002 · Cited by 78
In the Eyes of the Beholder: Experimental Evidence on the Contested Nature of Materiality in Sustainability Reporting
Reimsbach, D., Schiemann, F., Hahn, R., & Schmiedchen, E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026619875436 · Cited by 77
Irrational Choice under Uncertainty Correlates with Lower Striatal D2/3Receptor Binding in Rats
Cocker, P. J., Dinelle, K., Kornelson, R., Sossi, V., & Winstanley, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0626-12.2012 · Cited by 78
Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study
GRANENA, G. (2016) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716415000120 · Cited by 40
The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox
Nagel, J. (2011) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 76
Two systems of reasoning: architecture and relation to emotion
Darlow, A., & Sloman, S. A. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.34 · Cited by 75
Sequentiality of Product Review Information Provision: An Information Foraging Perspective1
Li, M., Tan, C., Wei, K., & Wang, K. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.3.09 · Cited by 69
The Grammar of Interactives
Heine, B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192871497.001.0001 · Cited by 69
Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology
Gillard, E., Dooren, W. V., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000202728 · Cited by 68
Dual-process theories and consciousness: the case for ‘Type Zero’ cognition: Table 1.
Shea, N. J., & Frith, C. (2016) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niw005 · Cited by 68
What Intuitions Are… and Are Not
Thompson, V. A. (2013) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00002-0 · Cited by 67
Norms and rationality. Is moral behavior a form of rational action?
Opp, K. (2012) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9315-6 · Cited by 64
Slower is not always better: Response-time evidence clarifies the limited role of miserly information processing in the Cognitive Reflection Test
Stupple, E. J. N., Pitchford, M., Ball, L. J., Hunt, T. E., & Steel, R. P. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186404 · Cited by 61
Rethinking clinical decision-making to improve clinical reasoning
Corrao, S., & Argano, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.900543 · Cited by 61
A Case Study
Osman, M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613483475 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Development of intuitive rules: Evaluating the application of the dual-system framework to understanding children’s intuitive reasoning
Osman, M., & Stavy, R. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213907 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Emotions and the Micro-Foundations of Commitment Problems
Renshon, J., Lee, J., & Tingley, D. H. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000473 · Cited by 58
Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.
Stephens, R. G., Dunn, J. C., & Hayes, B. K. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000088 · Cited by 58
The mere liking effect: Attitudinal influences on attributions of moral character
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., Kulesza, W. M., Schnall, S., & Wojciszke, B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.007 · Cited by 66
Dual Process Theory of Thought and Default Mode Network: A Possible Neural Foundation of Fast Thinking
Gronchi, G., & Giovannelli, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01237 · Cited by 60
Will the Conscious–Subconscious Pacing Quagmire Help Elucidate the Mechanisms of Self-Paced Exercise? New Opportunities in Dual Process Theory and Process Tracing Methods
Micklewright, D. P., Kegerreis, S., Raglin, J. S., & Hettinga, F. J. (2016) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0642-6 · Cited by 56
Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386 · Cited by 52
Proportional Reasoning as a Heuristic-Based Process
Gillard, E., Dooren, W. V., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.92 · Cited by 52
‘What happens when you intuit?’: Understanding human resource practitioners’ subjective experience of intuition through a novel linguistic method
Sadler‐Smith, E. (2016) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726715602047 · Cited by 60
In search of reflection-in-action: An exploratory study of the interactive reflection of four experienced teachers
Anderson, J. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102879 · Cited by 49
Modelling a rational choice theory of criminal action: Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interactions
Mehlkop, G., & Graeff, P. (2010) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463110364730 · Cited by 48
Cumulative culture and explicit metacognition: a review of theories, evidence and key predictions
Dunstone, J., & Caldwell, C. A. (2018) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0200-y · Cited by 51
The Nonconscious at Work
Pratt, M. G., & Crosina, E. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062517 · Cited by 52
Double dissociation of neural responses supporting perceptual and cognitive components of social cognition: Evidence from processing of others' pain
Sessa, P., Meconi, F., & Han, S. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07424 · Cited by 50
Reducing Organizational Rule Breaking Through Task Variety: How Task Design Supports Deliberative Thinking
Derfler-Rozin, R. R., Moore, C., & Staats, B. R. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1094 · Cited by 44
Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
Simon, D., & Read, S. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231204579 · Cited by 47
Understanding Life-Span Developmental Changes in Decision-Making Competence
Strough, J., Parker, A. M., & de Bruin, W. B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417148-0.00012-1 · Cited by 44
Stakeholder Judgments of Value
Lankoski, L., Smith, N. C., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2016) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.28 · Cited by 44

Authors: Osman, M.
Affiliations: University College London (GB)
Corresponding author: Osman, Magda
ORCID: Osman, Magda
Venue: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2004-12
Volume: 11
Issue: 6
Pages: 988-1010
ISSN: 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
1531-5320
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196730
OpenAlex: W2022112401
Cited by: 444
References: 243
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 13
FWCI: 3.84
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Economic and Social Research Council
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords: dual-process theory, reasoning, dual-process models, representational properties
MeSH terms: Humans, Models, Psychological, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks