Cited by 2,882Cognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide

Open access

Abstract

Working memory (WM) span tasks-and in particular, counting span, operation span, and reading span tasks-are widely used measures of WM capacity. Despite their popularity, however, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of the merits of WM span tasks as measurement tools. Here, we review the genesis of these tasks and discuss how and why they came to be so influential. In so doing, we address the reliability and validity of the tasks, and we consider more technical aspects of the tasks, such as optimal administration and scoring procedures. Finally, we discuss statistical and methodological techniques that have commonly been used in conjunction with WM span tasks, such as latent variable analysis and extreme-groups designs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196772

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Ebbinghaus, H. (1897). Über eine neue Methode zur Prü fung geistiger Fähigkeiten und ihre Anwendung bei Schulkindern On a new method of testing mental abilities and its application with school children].Zeitschrift für die Psychologie,13, 401–459.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,016

Metadata

Authors
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Conway, Andrew R. A.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2005-10
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
769-786
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2164740960
Cited by
2,882
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 218 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 176 · 2016: 170 · 2015: 187 · 2014: 151 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 137
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
working memory span, operation span, reading span, working memory capacity, reliability statistics, validity, test administration, scoring methods, latent variable analysis
MeSH terms
Group Processes, Humans, Memory, Psychological Theory, Reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review