The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1973) · Readings in Welfare Economics · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15492-0_10 · Cited by 2,743
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708 · cited 1×
“…related aspects of self-COntrol.1\vo forms of temporal discounting ftmctions have been proposed, an exponential model and a hyperbolic model (e.g., Ainslie, 1975, 1992; Loewenstein, 1992; Mazur, 1987; Samuelson, 1937), along with variations on these forms (Green, Fry, & Myerson, 1994; Loewenstein…”
BackgroundAnomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118482 · Cited by 2,305
Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency
Thaler, R. (1981) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7 · Cited by 2,243
A Note on Measurement of Utility
Samuelson, P. A. (1937) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2967612 · Cited by 2,164
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Commons, M. L., Mazur, J., Nevin, J. A., & Rachlin, H. C. (1987) · doi:10.4324/9781315825502-11 · Cited by 1,861
Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience
Koopmans, T. C. (1960) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907722 · Cited by 1,532
SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND DELAY
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233 · Cited by 1,341
COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF‐CONTROL1
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citation
Cited by
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 · Cited by 3,006
A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769 · Cited by 1,676
Self-citationAREA UNDER THE CURVE AS A MEASURE OF DISCOUNTING
Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationAn opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
WITHIN‐SUBJECT COMPARISON OF REAL AND HYPOTHETICAL MONEY REWARDS IN DELAY DISCOUNTING
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129 · Cited by 991
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, L., Myerson, J., & Mcfadden, E.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 715-723
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2115743154
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03211314
- The paper
- Green, L., Myerson, J., & Mcfadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
