The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: Effects of valence and magnitude manipulations
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this research was to further our understanding of how the striatum responds to the delivery of affective feedback. Previously, we had found that the striatum showed a pattern of sustained activation after presentation of a monetary reward, in contrast to a decrease in the hemodynamic response after a punishment. In this study, we tested whether the activity of the striatum could be modulated by parametric variations in the amount of financial reward or punishment. We used an event-related fMRI design in which participants received large or small monetary rewards or punishments after performance in a gambling task. A parametric ordering of conditions was observed in the dorsal striatum according to both magnitude and valence. In addition, an early response to the presentation of feedback was observed and replicated in a second experiment with increased temporal resolution. This study further implicates the dorsal striatum as an integral component of a reward circuitry responsible for the control of motivated behavior, serving to code for such feedback properties as valence and magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The IPS and putamen have both been associated with response planning, oculomotor control (Everling & Munoz, 2000), reward prediction (Peck et al., 2009) and outcome (Delgado et al., 2003).”
From Developmental changes in brain function underlying the influence of reward processing on inhibitory control (2011) · cites this paper as Delgado et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“previous studies have shown that in the context of uncertainty (e.g., gambling task) also the dorsal striatum responds to valence (reward or loss) and magnitude of outcomes, showing strongest activation to large monetary rewards, and weakest activation to large monetary losses (Delgado et al., 2003).”
From Testosterone levels correspond with increased ventral striatum activation in response to monetary rewards in adolescents (2011) · cites this paper as Delgado et al., 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.
Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · Cited by 4,212
Emotion, Decision Making and the Orbitofrontal Cortex
Bechara, A. (2000) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 · Cited by 3,589
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184 · Cited by 2,948
Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens
Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W., & Hommer, D. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-j0002.2001 · Cited by 2,244
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Crespi, L. P. (1942). Quantitative variation of reinforcement and level of performance. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 467-517.
- Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: An approach to medical cerebral imaging. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.129 · Cited by 3,718
The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation
Yin, H. H., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1919 · Cited by 2,402
Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning
O'Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094285 · Cited by 2,088
By Carrot or by Stick: Cognitive Reinforcement Learning in Parkinsonism
Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102941 · Cited by 1,964
The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100735 · Cited by 1,768
Metadata
- Authors
- DELGADO, M. R., LOCKE, H. M., STENGER, V. A., & FIEZ, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- DELGADO, M. R.
- Venue
- Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-135X
- OpenAlex
- W2128577709
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9720350)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA14103, R01DA014103)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- dorsal striatum, reward, punishment, emotional feedback, valence, reward magnitude, monetary rewards, gambling task, parametric modulation, motivated behavior, reward systems, hemodynamic response
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Punishment, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Time Factors, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
