Testosterone levels correspond with increased ventral striatum activation in response to monetary rewards in adolescents
Open accessAbstract
Risk taking is an integral part of learning and development, particularly during adolescence the prevalence of risky behaviors peak. It is hypothesized that the tendency to take risks is related to pubertal maturation, where there is interplay between gonadal hormones, the neural mechanisms that underlie affective (e.g., reward) processing, and risky behavior. To test this hypothesis, fifty healthy adolescents (aged 10-16 years; 33 girls, 17 boys) at different stages of puberty performed a gambling task while lying in the MRI scanner, and provided saliva samples for hormone assessment. Gonadal hormone levels were correlated with the neural response to receiving a monetary reward. Results showed that testosterone level correlated positively with activation in the striatum for both boys and girls, suggesting that individual differences in hormones at puberty are related to the way adolescents respond to reward, which can ultimately affect risk-taking behavior.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 50 healthy adolescents aged 10–16, salivary testosterone was positively associated with ventral striatum activation to monetary reward versus loss in both boys and girls. The authors interpret this as evidence that pubertal gonadal hormones may contribute to heightened reward sensitivity, though effects in girls were weaker and analyses did not survive strict multiple-comparison correction.
Key findings
- Testosterone positively predicted reward > loss activation in the ventral striatum: boys showed bilateral ventral striatum activation at whole-brain p < .001, girls showed left ventral striatum activation at p < .005; independent nucleus accumbens ROI correlations were boys r = .75 and girls r = .34, both p < .05.
- Hierarchical regression showed age alone did not significantly predict striatal activation (boys R² = .26, p = .06; girls R² = .00, p = .99), while adding testosterone explained additional variance (boys ΔR² = .31, p = .017; girls ΔR² = .14, p = .044). In boys the combined model was significant, F(2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01, with only testosterone significant, b = .031, t(11) = 2.8, p = .017; in girls the combined model was not significant, F(2, 27) = 2.24, p = .126, but testosterone was positively related, b = .044, t(27) = 2.12, p = .044.
- Participants chose to spin more often on low-risk trials (mean = 90.4%) than high-risk trials (mean = 37.3%), F(1, 49) = 162.95, p < .001, with no significant sex differences. Testosterone levels were significantly higher in boys than girls, t(42) = 1.77, p = .04.
- Reward > loss main effects included dorsal and ventral striatum and medial orbitofrontal cortex; boys and girls separately showed bilateral striatum activation, with no sex differences. In girls, estradiol at p < .005 related to dorsal striatum, DLPFC, and medial PFC.
Methods
- Fifty healthy, right-handed adolescents aged 10–16 years (33 girls, 17 boys) participated; after exclusions for insufficient spin/feedback trials, hormone–fMRI analyses included 14 boys (M age = 13.4, SD = .56) and 30 girls (M age = 12.9, SD = .38). Participants provided saliva samples for testosterone, estradiol, and DHEA and completed the Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and picture-based interview about puberty (PBIP).
- While in a 3T Philips scanner, participants performed the Jackpot gambling task: on each trial they could choose to spin (low-risk or high-risk) or reset, then received reward, loss, or reset feedback. There were 50 trials (20 low-risk, 30 high-risk).
- fMRI data were analyzed in SPM5 using a GLM; reward and loss outcomes were modeled at feedback onset, and whole-brain regression analyses tested hormone levels as predictors of the reward > loss contrast separately for boys and girls. MarsBaR ROI analyses and hierarchical regression predicting nucleus accumbens activation from age and testosterone were also performed.
Limitations
- Stated: age was correlated with puberty score and testosterone, potentially confounding the testosterone–striatum relation; hierarchical regression indicated testosterone, not age, was the better predictor, but future studies should disentangle age and pubertal development using a narrower age range and sex matching.
- Stated: analyses did not survive strict corrections for multiple comparisons; the testosterone relation in girls was found only at a less stringent threshold and was less robust, possibly due to lower testosterone variability, menstrual-cycle instability, or measurement error.
- Evident: the sample was small, especially for boys (n = 14); the design was cross-sectional and correlational, so causality cannot be established; the girls’ combined age-plus-testosterone model was not significant; and the authors note they lacked power to test an age-by-sex interaction.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ a b s t r a c t
Testosterone level correlated positively with activation in the striatum for both boys and girls.
“Results showed that testosterone level correlated positively with activation in the striatum for both boys and girls”
- Also stated in: § 3.4. Hormone level as predictor · plain
“A whole-brain regression analysis with testosterone level as predictor on the contrast reward > loss in boys ( n = 14) showed that boys with higher testosterone levels had more activation in the bilateral ventral striatum (Fig. 4A, left panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.4. Hormone level as predictor · plain
- Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone results
Testosterone levels were significantly higher in boys than in girls.
“As predicted, testosterone levels were significantly higher in boys than in girls, t (42) = 1.77, p = .04.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictor
Testosterone level predicted the extent of activation in several areas of the ventral striatum, such that higher levels of testosterone corresponded with increased reward-related activation in both boys and girls.
“As can be seen in Fig. 5, testosterone level predicted the extent of activation in these several areas of the ventral striatum, such that higher levels of testosterone corresponded with increased reward-related activation in both boys and girls.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation · plain
“Results showed that testosterone levels were positively associated with activation in the ventral striatum in response to a monetary reward.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation · plain
“Specifically, in the nucleus accumbens it was found that both in boys and girls higher testosterone levels predicted more reward-related activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation · plain
- Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictor
Boys with higher testosterone levels had more activation in the bilateral ventral striatum on the reward > loss contrast.
“A whole-brain regression analysis with testosterone level as predictor on the contrast reward > loss in boys ( n = 14) showed that boys with higher testosterone levels had more activation in the bilateral ventral striatum (Fig. 4A, left panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.3. Reward processing: main effects
A two-sample t-test did not result in different levels of activation in boys versus in girls.
“A two-sample t -test did not result in different levels of activation in boys versus in girls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictor
When testosterone level was added to the regression, it made a significant contribution to explaining the variance in reward-related activation for boys (Delta1 R2 = .31, p = .017) and girls (Delta1 R2 = .14, p = .044).
“When testosterone level was added to the regression, a significant contribution was made to explaining the variance in reward-related activation for boys, Delta1 R 2 = .31, p = .017, and girls, Delta1 R 2 = .14, p = .044.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone results
Testosterone level did not correlate significantly with PDS scores in girls.
“In addition, because testosterone level did not correlate significantly with PDS scores in girls, estradiol level was used to test for neural correlations in girls only”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.1. Task performance
Participants chose to play more often on low-risk trials (mean = 90.4%) than on high-risk trials (mean = 37.3%).
“As predicted, participants chose to play more often on low-risk trials (mean = 90.4%) than on high-risk trials (mean = 37.3%; F (1, 49) = 162.95, p < .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary reward
The task elicited strong and robust activation in the ventral striatum in both boys and girls.
“Most importantly, the task elicited strong and robust activation in the ventral striatum in both boys and girls, which sets the stage for the examination of hormone effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictor
A whole-brain regression analysis with testosterone level as predictor on the reward > loss contrast including all participants resulted in robust activation in the ventral striatum.
“Additionally, results of a whole-brain regression analysis with testosterone level as predictor on the reward > loss contrast including all participants ( n = 44; 14 boys, 30 girls) also resulted in robust activation in the ventral striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.3. Reward processing: main effects
Whole-brain results for boys and girls separately resulted in bilateral activation in the striatum in both groups.
“Whole-brain results for boys and girls separately resulted in bilateral activation in the striatum in both groups (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.3. Reward processing: main effects
The whole-brain analysis including all participants resulted in activation in reward-related brain regions including the dorsal and ventral striatum, and the medial orbitofrontal cortex.
“The whole-brain analysis including all participants resulted in several areas of activation, particularly in reward-related brain regions including the dorsal and ventral striatum, and the medial orbitofrontal cortex (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone results
Salivary hormone levels correlated significantly with PDS scores for testosterone, estradiol, and DHEA in boys and girls.
“Correlations were computed between PDS scores and salivary hormone levels for boys and girls separately. These correlations were significant for testosterone, estradiol and DHEA (Table 1), indicating that the hormone levels assessed by saliva samples provided a sensitive index of puberty level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone results
PDS and PBIP correlated highly with each other for both boys and girls.
“Furthermore, because both measures (PDS and PBIP) correlated highly with each other for both boys ( r = .89, p < .01) and girls ( r = .72, p < .01; Table 1), only one measure (i.e., average PDS score) was selected and used for further analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 5. Conclusions
The finding that gonadal hormone levels are positively associated with neural response to monetary reward was more robust in boys (for testosterone) than in girls (for testosterone and estradiol).
“Despite that this finding was more robust in boys (for testosterone) than in girls (for testosterone and estradiol), these results provide insight into the underlying mechanism of reward processing, and further our understanding about the role of gonadal hormones in individual neural differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
Estradiol level showed a positive relation with reward-related activation in the dorsal striatum, DLPFC, and medial PFC in girls, although at a less stringent threshold.
“Results for estradiol, a more reliable measure of pubertal development in girls (Shirtcliff et al., 2009), also showed a positive relation with reward-related activation in the dorsal striatum, DLPFC, and medial PFC, although again at a less stringent threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
The relation between testosterone and reward-related activation was more robust in boys than in girls.
“The relation between testosterone and reward-related activation was more robust in boys than in girls, possibly due to lower variability in testosterone level in girls than in boys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5. Conclusions
Results of the present study showed that individual differences in gonadal hormone levels at different stages of puberty are positively associated with individual differences in the neural response to monetary reward.
“Results of the present study showed that individual differences in gonadal hormone levels at different stages of puberty are positively associated with individual differences in the neural response to monetary reward”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.2. Pubertal assessment
Testosterone is the most valid measure of gonadal hormones in both boys and girls.
“In the current study, the main focus was on testosterone, as this measure is most valid in both boys and girls (Shirtcliff et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shirtcliff et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1. Girls and boys exhibit similar risk taking behavior
In a prior behavioral study (Van Leijenhorst et al., 2008), boys took more risks than girls when participants had to select between a response option with low probability of a high reward and high probability of a small reward (forced gamble).
“In a prior behavioral study in which participants had to select between a response option with low probability of a high reward and high probability of a small reward (i.e., a forced gamble), boys were found to take more risks than girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Leijenhorst et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data§ 3.1. Task performance
There was no significant age difference between the final groups of 14 boys and 30 girls.
“There was no significant age difference between these groups, F (1, 42) = .38, p > .05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary reward
In this study, there was not enough power (observations per age group) to test the age by sex interaction.
“However, in this study we did not have enough power (i.e., observations per age group) to test this age by sex interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1. Girls and boys exhibit similar risk taking behavior
In the prior study (Van Leijenhorst et al., 2008), participants played for small amounts of money (10 Eurocents), like the current study.
“In this study, like the current study, the participants also played for small amounts of money (i.e., 10 Eurocents; Van Leijenhorst et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Leijenhorst et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 3.2. Hormone results
Salivary hormone levels provided a sensitive index of puberty level.
“indicating that the hormone levels assessed by saliva samples provided a sensitive index of puberty level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictor
Individual differences in reward-related activation in the ventral striatum can be better explained by testosterone level as opposed to age.
“These results suggest that individual differences in reward-related activation in the ventral striatum can be better explained by testosterone level as opposed to age.”
- Also stated in: § 4.4. Limitations · plain
“Reassuringly, hierarchical regression analyses showed that testosterone, not age, was the best predictor for neural activity in boys and girls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4.4. Limitations · plain
- Interpretationcitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
The relation between reward-related activation and estradiol was in a different set of brain regions, namely those associated with cognitive control.
“Interestingly, the relation between reward-related activation with estradiol was in a different set of brain regions, namely those associated with cognitive control (Nelson et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
Individual differences in testosterone levels at puberty may explain individual differences in the neural response to reward versus loss.
“strengthening our conclusion that individual differences in testosterone levels at puberty may explain individual differences in the neural response to reward versus loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
The analyses did not survive strict corrections for multiple comparisons.
“Furthermore, these results should be interpreted with caution, because the analyses did not survive strict corrections for multiple comparisons, but provide interesting hypotheses for future research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5. Conclusions
The drastic rise of gonadal hormone levels at puberty may contribute to increased reward sensitivity (i.e., enhanced striatum response to reward) that is observed in adolescents.
“suggesting that the drastic rise of gonadal hormone levels at puberty may contribute to increased reward sensitivity (i.e., enhanced striatum response to reward) that is observed in adolescents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
Fluctuations in levels of estrogen (or estradiol) contribute to changes in prefrontal functioning.
“suggesting that fluctuations in levels of estrogen (or estradiol) contribute to changes in prefrontal functioning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation
Individual differences in estradiol levels are associated with functional differences in brain regions that are involved in cognitive control.
“These findings support the likelihood that individual differences in estradiol levels are associated with functional differences in brain regions that are involved in cognitive control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.1. Task performanceThere were no significant sex differences in choice selection; both boys and girls selected 'spin' more often in the low-risk condition compared to the high-risk condition, and did so to the same extent.
“No significant sex differences in choice selection were found; both boys and girls selected 'spin' more often in the low-risk (LR) condition compared to the high-risk (HR) condition, and did so to the same extent (boy vs. girl for LR: 91.5% vs. 89.8%, for HR: 31.0% vs. 40.6%), F (1, 48) = .99, p > .05 (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictorIn girls, the model including both age and testosterone was not significant (F(2, 27) = 2.24, p = .126), but there was a positive relation between testosterone and striatal activation (b = .044, t(27) = 2.12, p = .044).
“In girls, the model including both predictors was not significant, F (2, 27) = 2.24, p = .126, however, there was a positive relation between testosterone and striatal activation, b = .044, t (27) = 2.12, p = .044.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1. Girls and boys exhibit similar risk taking behaviorParticipants showed increased risk taking on low-risk trials compared to high-risk trials, and this pattern was similar for boys and girls.
“As predicted, participants showed increased risk taking on low-risk trials compared to high-risk trials, and this pattern of behavior was similar for boys and girls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictorIn girls, testosterone level as predictor on the reward > loss contrast did not result in activation at p < .001, but at p < .005, activation was observed in the left ventral striatum at a similar location as in boys.
“This analysis did not result in activation at the threshold p < .001, but when the threshold was lowered to p < .005, activation was observed in the left ventral striatum at a similar location as in boys (Fig. 4A, right panel).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationIn the left nucleus accumbens ROI, follow-up tests confirmed the whole-brain analyses and resulted in positive correlations between testosterone and activation for both boys (r = .75) and girls (r = .34), both p's < .05.
“In girls this relation was only found at a less stringent threshold but was statistically confirmed using an independent sphere ROI analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone resultsEstradiol levels and DHEA levels did not differ significantly between boys and girls.
“Estradiol levels and DHEA levels did not differ significantly between boys and girls (both p 's > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictorIn boys, the model predicting striatal activation by age and testosterone was significant (F(2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01), and only testosterone level explained a significant proportion of the variance in activation in the ventral striatum (b = .031, t(11) = 2.8, p = .017).
“The model in which striatal activation was predicted by age and testosterone was significant in boys, F (2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01, and tests of the individual regression coefficients showed that only testosterone level explained a significant proportion of the variance in activation in the ventral striatum, b = .031, t (11) = 2.8, p = .017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2. Hormone resultsAverage PDS score did not differ significantly between boys and girls, and average PBIP score did not differ significantly between boys and girls.
“Average PDS score did not differ significantly between boys (mean = 2.0) and girls (mean = 2.5, p > .05), and similarly average PBIP score demonstrated no significant differences between boys (mean = 3.0) and girls (mean = 3.1, p > .05; Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.4. Hormone level as predictorAge as a single predictor did not account for a significant proportion of the variance in activation of the ventral striatum in boys (R2 = .26, F(1, 12) = 4.18, p = .06) nor in girls (R2 = .00, F(1, 28) = .00, p = .99).
“Results of this analysis showed that age as a single predictor did not account for a significant proportion of the variance in activation of the ventral striatum in boys, R 2 = .26, F (1, 12) = 4.18, p = .06, nor in girls, R 2 = .00, F (1, 28) = .00, p = .99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardAdolescents showed no sex differences in reward processing; boys and girls displayed similar bilateral activation of the striatum.
“Adolescents showed no sex differences in reward processing; boys and girls displayed similar bilateral activation of the striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardFor the contrast reward > loss, regions of activation for all participants included the dorsal and ventral striatum and the medial orbitofrontal cortex; for boys and girls separately, activation included the bilateral striatum in both groups.
“When participants chose to take a risk and won (i.e., received a monetary reward), they recruited brain areas including the dorsal and ventral striatum, and the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a b s t r a c tThe preference for risk taking peaks at around age 14.
“One study that replicated this developmental peak in risky behavior in an experimental setting showed that the preference for risk taking peaks at around age 14 (Burnett et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burnett et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1.1. Developmental peak in reward sensitivityThe striatum is sensitive to monetary rewards.
“The adult literature using such paradigms has shown that the striatum is sensitive to (monetary) rewards (Breiter et al., 2001; Delgado, 2007; McClure et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ a b s t r a c tSensation seeking peaks in adolescence, and girls reach their peak at a younger age than boys.
“Sensation seeking not only peaks in adolescence, but also girls reach their peak at a younger age than boys (Romer and Hennessy, 2007), possibly due to sex differences in pubertal maturation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romer and Hennessy, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a b s t r a c tSensation seeking is a personality trait related to risk-taking behavior.
“Sensation seeking is regarded as a personality trait that is related to risk-taking behavior (Llewellyn, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Llewellyn, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a b s t r a c tSensation seeking appears to increase in association with pubertal maturation.
“There has been particular interest in sensation seeking which appears to increase in association with pubertal maturation (Steinberg, 2008; Forbes and Dahl, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Steinberg, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Forbes and Dahl, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingIn adults, higher testosterone levels result in increased striatal activity during reward anticipation.
“Another study in adults that administered testosterone and focused on neural processing during reward anticipation showed that higher testosterone levels resulted in increased striatal activity (Hermans et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hermans et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationCompetition is associated with increased testosterone levels, and winning as opposed to losing a monetary reward during a hypothetical competition is associated with a higher increase of testosterone levels.
“These findings are also in line with previous literature showing that competition is associated with increased testosterone levels, and more importantly, winning as opposed to losing a monetary reward during a hypothetical competition is associated with a higher increase of testosterone levels (Archer, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationHigh basal levels of testosterone are associated with neurochemical and behavioral changes in response to winning as opposed to losing, whereas low basal levels of testosterone are not.
“Furthermore, high basal levels of testosterone are associated with neurochemical and behavioral changes in response to winning as opposed to losing, whereas low basal levels of testosterone are not (Mehta et al., 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehta et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardBrain areas including the dorsal and ventral striatum and medial orbitofrontal cortex play a key role in reward processing.
“These brain areas play a key role in reward processing (Haber and Knutson, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haber and Knutson, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationNeuroanatomical studies have shown that gonadal hormones at puberty are associated with changes in both gray and white matter, with testosterone and estradiol showing differential effects in adolescent boys and girls.
“Furthermore, neuroanatomical studies have shown that gonadal hormones at puberty are associated with changes in both gray and white matter, with testosterone and estradiol showing differential effects in adolescent boys and girls (Peper et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peper et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.5. fMRI preprocessing and statistical analysisBecause the time-course, physiology, hormones, and component physical changes of pubertal maturation differ markedly for boys and girls, all analyses were performed separately for each sex.
“Because the time-course, physiology, hormones, and component physical changes of pubertal maturation differ markedly for boys and girls (Dorn et al., 2006), all analyses were performed separately for each sex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorn et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardIn the context of uncertainty (e.g., gambling task), the dorsal striatum responds to valence (reward or loss) and magnitude of outcomes, showing strongest activation to large monetary rewards and weakest activation to large monetary losses.
“previous studies have shown that in the context of uncertainty (e.g., gambling task) also the dorsal striatum responds to valence (reward or loss) and magnitude of outcomes, showing strongest activation to large monetary rewards, and weakest activation to large monetary losses (Delgado et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Delgado et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 2.2. Pubertal assessmentHormone levels were relatively stable across two days and provided a reliable indicator of basal hormone level.
“The mean hormone levels across the three samples that were collected each day correlated highly between the two days for both testosterone ( r = .93, p < .001), estradiol ( r = .86, p < .001), and DHEA ( r = .83, p < .001), indicating that hormone levels were relatively stable across days, and hence a reliable indicator of the participant's basal hormone level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingIn the Iowa gambling task, higher testosterone levels lead participants to choose more often from card decks that resulted in large monetary rewards, despite a net monetary loss.
“More specifically, when performing the Iowa gambling task, higher testosterone levels lead participants to choose more often from card decks that resulted in large (as opposed to moderate) monetary rewards, despite a net monetary loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Honk et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingReward processing changes with menstrual cycle phase.
“However, it has been found that reward processing changes with menstrual cycle phase (Dreher et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dreher et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardThe medial OFC specifically responds to abstract rewards, such as monetary gain.
“The medial OFC specifically responds to abstract rewards, such as monetary gain (Kringelbach and Rolls, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kringelbach and Rolls, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingChanges in gonadal hormone levels are associated with changes in the magnitude and/or extent of the response to reward, specifically in the striatum.
“This model suggests that changes in gonadal hormone levels (or different levels of puberty) are associated with changes in the magnitude and/or extent of the response to reward, specifically in the striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 1.1. Developmental peak in reward sensitivityThe adolescent inclination to take risks might be associated with increased sensitivity to rewards, as indicated by an adolescent-specific peak in activation of the striatum.
“suggesting that the adolescent inclination to take risks might be associated with increased sensitivity to rewards, as indicated by an adolescent-specific peak in activation of the striatum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingThe exact nature of changes in affective processing, the relation with gonadal hormones, and how they affect motivational behavior in adolescents is not yet well understood.
“However, the exact nature of these changes, the relation with gonadal hormones, and how they affect motivational behavior in adolescents is not yet well understood (Doremus-Fitzwater et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doremus-Fitzwater et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingTestosterone contributes to a shift to less punishment sensitivity and relatively greater reward sensitivity.
“This was interpreted as testosterone contributing to a shift to less punishment sensitivity and relatively greater reward sensitivity (Van Honk et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Honk et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ a b s t r a c tIndividual differences in hormones at puberty are related to the way adolescents respond to reward, which can ultimately affect risk-taking behavior.
“suggesting that individual differences in hormones at puberty are related to the way adolescents respond to reward, which can ultimately affect risk-taking behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Individual differences in reward-related striatal activation affect risk-taking behavior.
- Rests on an assumption: The sample of healthy adolescents aged 10-16 is representative of the broader adolescent population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.1. Developmental peak in reward sensitivityIn response to rewards, adolescents recruit similar brain regions (including the striatum) as children and adults.
“Developmental studies have shown that in response to rewards, adolescents recruit similar brain regions (including the striatum) as children and adults.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geier and Luna, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationBoth functional and structural changes in the brain are associated with individual differences in gonadal hormone levels at puberty.
“These findings suggest that both functional and structural changes in the brain are associated with individual differences in gonadal hormone levels at puberty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1. Girls and boys exhibit similar risk taking behaviorIt is unlikely that the absence of sex differences in risk taking is related to small rewards per se; rather, it is likely that the absence of a forced gamble results in different patterns of risk taking.
“Thus, it is unlikely that the absence of sex differences is related to small rewards per se, but rather, it is likely that the absence of a forced gamble results in different patterns of risk taking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingExogenous administration of testosterone increases the likelihood of disadvantageous or risky decision-making in adults.
“Previous studies have shown in adults that the exogenous administration of testosterone increases the likelihood of disadvantageous or risky decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Honk et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationNelson's social information processing network (SIPN) model predicts that affective changes (e.g., changes in reward processing) are associated with changes in limbic brain regions, such as the nucleus accumbens, that are specifically influenced by gonadal hormones.
“These findings are in line with Nelson's social information processing network (SIPN) model, which predicts that affective changes (e.g., changes in reward processing) are associated with changes in limbic brain regions, such as the nucleus accumbens, that are specifically influenced by gonadal hormones (Nelson et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingIn adolescents at different pubertal stages, higher natural testosterone levels correspond with increased striatal activity during reward anticipation, but with decreased striatal activity during reward outcome processing.
“Similar results were found in adolescents at different pubertal stages; the natural occurrence of higher testosterone levels corresponded with increased striatal activity during reward anticipation, but with decreased striatal activity during reward outcome processing (Forbes et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Forbes et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 2.4. MRI data acquisitionAverage head movement was .09 mm for boys and .09 mm for girls, with no significant sex differences.
“Average head movement was .09 mm (SD = .05) for boys and .09 mm (SD = .05) for girls, and there were no significant sex differences in head motion ( p > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.1. Developmental peak in reward sensitivityThe extent to which these brain regions are recruited differs across age groups.
“However, the extent to which these brain regions are recruited differs across age groups (Geier and Luna, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geier and Luna, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.1. Developmental peak in reward sensitivityAt the moment of receiving a reward, the striatum response is stronger in adolescents compared to children and adults.
“However, the convergence of evidence appears to support the model that specifically at the moment of receiving a reward, the striatum response is stronger in adolescents compared to children and adults (Galvan, 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Galvan, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingChanges in affective processing during adolescence may be associated with the increase of gonadal hormones at puberty that influence neural processing in the limbic brain regions, such as the striatum.
“According to Nelson et al. (2005) changes in affective processing during adolescence (e.g., reward processing and reorientation to peer social stimuli) may be associated with the increase of gonadal hormones at puberty that influence neural processing in the limbic brain regions, such as the striatum (see SIPN model: Nelson et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.2. Girls and boys recruit similar brain areas in response to monetary rewardThe ventral striatum has been associated with coding for subjective value of reward.
“Whereas the ventral striatum has been associated with coding for subjective value of reward (Peters and Büchel, 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters and Büchel, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 1.2. Pubertal maturation, gonadal hormones, and reward processingThe relation between testosterone and striatal activity differs depending on the phase of risky decision making.
“suggesting that the relation between testosterone and striatal activity differs depending on the phase of risky decision making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationThe neural response to reward may have represented different phases of reward processing in these two paradigms, possibly explaining the discrepancy in results.
“Thus, the neural response to reward may have represented different phases of reward processing in these two paradigms, possibly explaining the discrepancy in results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 4.4. LimitationsAge was correlated with puberty score and testosterone level, possibly confounding the relation between testosterone and striatum activation.
“One limitation of this study calls for cautious interpretation of the findings, namely that age was correlated with puberty score and testosterone level, possibly confounding the relation between testosterone and striatum activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationThe absence of a robust relation between gonadal hormones and reward-related activation in girls might be due to girls having less stable hormone levels due to the menstrual cycle, or possible measurement errors.
“A possible explanation for the absence of a robust relation between gonadal hormones and reward-related activation in girls, despite showing similar neural responses to reward compared to boys, might be that girls have less stable hormone levels due to the menstrual cycle, or possible measurement errors which are summarized below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationEstradiol is a more reliable measure of pubertal development in girls.
“Results for estradiol, a more reliable measure of pubertal development in girls (Shirtcliff et al., 2009), also showed a positive relation with reward-related activation in the dorsal striatum, DLPFC, and medial PFC, although again at a less stringent threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shirtcliff et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationEstrogen-replacement therapy in postmenopausal women protects against cognitive decline across different domains of cognitive functioning, including attention, memory, and reasoning.
“Also, estrogen-replacement therapy in postmenopausal women protects against cognitive decline across different domains of cognitive functioning, including attention, memory, and reasoning (Sherwin, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherwin, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationThe more robust relation between testosterone and reward-related activation in boys may be due to lower variability in testosterone level in girls than in boys.
“The relation between testosterone and reward-related activation was more robust in boys than in girls, possibly due to lower variability in testosterone level in girls than in boys.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationThe discrepancy with Forbes et al. may be explained by a difference in experimental paradigms: in Forbes et al.'s study a card-guessing game was used, and the neural response to reward was measured during the outcome phase time-locked to feedback presentation, whereas in the Jackpot task outcome and feedback were presented simultaneously and the neural response was time-locked to this combined ' '
“A possible explanation for this discrepancy is the difference in experimental paradigms; in Forbes et al.'s study a card-guessing game was used in which participants guessed whether the next playing card would be lower or higher than the stimulus card presented.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation · plain
“In the Jackpot task outcome (i.e., appearance of fruit in the third slot) and feedback (i.e., appearance of blue or red bar indicating gain or loss respectively) were presented simultaneously, and the neural response to reward was time-locked to this 'combined' presentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activation · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.3. Gonadal hormone levels correspond with stronger reward-related activationPrevious studies have shown that cognitive performance (e.g., working memory) changes across the menstrual cycle.
“Indeed previous studies have shown that cognitive performance (e.g., working memory) changes across the menstrual cycle (Jacobs and D'Esposito, 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobs and D'Esposito, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Individual differences in reward-related striatal activation affect risk-taking behavior.
“which can ultimately affect risk-taking behavior”
“suggesting that the adolescent inclination to take risks might be associated with increased sensitivity to rewards”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of healthy adolescents aged 10-16 is representative of the broader adolescent population.
“fifty healthy adolescents (aged 10-16 years; 33 girls, 17 boys) at different stages of puberty”
“suggesting that individual differences in hormones at puberty are related to the way adolescents respond to reward”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent neuroimaging studies support the idea that pubertal development plays a role in developmental change in the sensitivity of the striatum to reward.
“Recent neuroimaging studies also support the idea that, in addition to having profound effects on brain structure [a topic not covered in the present article; see Blakemore et al. (2010) and Smith et al. (2013) for reviews], pubertal development plays a role in developmental change in the sensitivity of the striatum to reward (Braams et al., 2015, Forbes et al., 2010, Op de Macks et al., 2011).”
From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Op de Macks et al., 2011
Increased testosterone has been associated with increased risk-taking on laboratory tasks among both boys and girls.
“In addition, increased testosterone has been associated with increased risk-taking on laboratory tasks among both boys and girls (Op de Macks et al., 2011, Peper and Dahl, 2013).”
From Becoming a sexual being: The “elephant in the room” of adolescent brain development (2017) · cites this paper as Op de Macks et al., 2011
The majority of neurodevelopmental studies in humans have identified testosterone, rather than estradiol, as the hormone most correlated with striatal activity related to risk-taking and social motivation in females.
“The majority of neurodevelopmental studies in humans have identified testosterone, rather than estradiol, as the hormone most correlated with striatal activity related to risk-taking and social motivation in females”
From Becoming a sexual being: The “elephant in the room” of adolescent brain development (2017) · cites this paper as Op de Macks et al., 2011
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
p-value fits an unstated one-tailed test: t (42) = 1.77, p = .04
MinorThe paper reports p = .04 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .084 (two-tailed). The reported value is what a one-tailed test gives, but the paper does not say near this result that a one-tailed test was used.
Reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .084
“t (42) = 1.77, p = .04”
Inconsistent p-value: F (2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01
MinorThe paper reports p = .01 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .020. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .020
“F (2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upt(42) = 1.77reported p = .04 · recomputed p = .084
“t (42) = 1.77, p = .04”
- Doesn’t add upF(2, 11) = 5.71reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .020
“F (2, 11) = 5.71, p = .01”
- ConsistentF(1, 12) = 4.18reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“F (1, 12) = 4.18, p = .06”
- ConsistentF(1, 28) = 0reported p = .99 · recomputed p = 1.000
“F (1, 28) = .00, p = .99”
- Consistentt(11) = 2.8reported p = .017 · recomputed p = .017
“t (11) = 2.8, p = .017”
- ConsistentF(2, 27) = 2.24reported p = .126 · recomputed p = .126
“F (2, 27) = 2.24, p = .126”
- Consistentt(27) = 2.12reported p = .044 · recomputed p = .043
“t (27) = 2.12, p = .044”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Girls' testosterone-puberty correlation is called both significant and nonsignificant
MajorTable 1 marks the girls' PDS-testosterone correlation as significant, and the results text also says the hormone correlations were significant. A later sentence says that this same correlation was not significant.
“because testosterone level did not correlate significantly with PDS scores in girls”
“These correlations were significant for testosterone, estradiol and DHEA (Table 1)”
Cites
(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,071 · see citing works
The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.129 · Cited by 3,718 · see citing works
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Steinberg, L. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 · Cited by 3,644 · see citing works
A self‐report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity and initial norms
Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01537962 · Cited by 3,129 · see citing works
KRINGELBACH, M. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006 · Cited by 1,977 · see citing works
Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00303-8 · Cited by 1,404 · see citing works
Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1062-06.2006 · Cited by 1,282 · see citing works
Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis
Archer, J. E. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007 · Cited by 1,250 · see citing works
Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry
Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x · Cited by 1,180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, the presence of peers increases risk taking behavior, and the response of the striatum to reward (Chein et al., 2010).”
Pubertal hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior
Sisk, C. L., & Zehr, J. L. (2005) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.10.003 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
NELSON, E. E., LEIBENLUFT, E., McCLURE, E. B., & PINE, D. S. (2005) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291704003915 · Cited by 1,075 · see citing works
Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum
DELGADO, M. R. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1390.002 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., Jazbec, S., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Leibenluft, E., Blair, J., & Pine, D. S. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.038 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Pubertal Development: Correspondence Between Hormonal and Physical Development
Shirtcliff, E. A., Dahl, R. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01263.x · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Self-citationBack to the future: The organizational-activational hypothesis adapted to puberty and adolescence
Schulz, K. M., Molenda-Figueira, H. A., & Sisk, C. L. (2009) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.010 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Modulation of Caudate Activity by Action Contingency
Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., & Fiez, J. A. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00848-1 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women
Dreher, J.-C., Schmidt, P. J., Kohn, P., Furman, D., Rubinow, D., & Berman, K. F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605569104 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: Similarities and differences from young adults
Bjork, J. M., Knutson, B., Fong, G. W., Caggiano, D. M., Bennett, S. M., & Hommer, D. W. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4862-03.2004 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Balas, B., Nelson, C. A., Westerlund, A., Vogel‐Farley, V. K., Riggins, T., & Kuefner, D. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.001.2010 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Adolescent development of the reward system
Galvan (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Pubertal development and behavior: hormonal activation of social and motivational tendencies
Forbes, E. E., & Dahl, R. E. (2010) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.007 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neural substrates of reward processing in humans: the modern role of FMRI
McClure, S. M., York, M. K., & Montague, P. R. (2004) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404263526 · Cited by 480 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The adult literature using such paradigms has shown that the striatum is sensitive to (monetary) rewards (Breiter et al., 2001; Delgado, 2007; McClure et al., 2004).”
Dorn, L. D., Dahl, R. E., Woodward, H. R., & Biro, F. (2006) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1207/s1532480xads1001_3 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescent risky decision-making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions
Van Leijenhorst, L., Moor, B. G., Op de Macks, Z. A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Westenberg, P. M., & Crone, E. A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat Motivates the Adolescent? Brain Regions Mediating Reward Sensitivity across Adolescence
Van Leijenhorst, L., Zanolie, K., Van Meel, C. S., Westenberg, P. M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp078 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman Striatal Responses to Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency
Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., Chappelow, J., & Berns, G. S. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00183-7 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations
DELGADO, M. R., LOCKE, H. M., STENGER, V. A., & FIEZ, J. A. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.1.27 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Shirtcliff, E. A. (2001) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(00)00042-1 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Neural representations of subjective reward value
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.031 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Doremus-Fitzwater, T. L., Varlinskaya, E. I., & Spear, L. P. (2010) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence.
Geier, C. F., Terwilliger, R., Teslovich, T., Velanova, K., & Luna, B. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp225 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Estrogen Shapes Dopamine-Dependent Cognitive Processes: Implications for Women's Health
Jacobs, E. G., & D’Esposito, M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6394-10.2011 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Rao, H., Korczykowski, M., Pluta, J. B., Hoang, A., & Detre, J. A. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.046 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards
Rademacher, L., Krach, S., Kohls, G., Irmak, A., Gründer, G., & Spreckelmeyer, K. N. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.089 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Phillips, M. L., Manuck, S. B., Worthman, C. M., Moyles, D. L., Tarr, J. A., Sciarrillo, S. R., & Dahl, R. E. (2010) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2009.11.006 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationTestosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women
van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J. L. G., Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Tuiten, A., & Koppeschaar, H. P. F. (2003) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.08.007 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Mehta, P. H., Jones, A. C., & Josephs, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1078 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Römer, D., & Hennessy, M. H. (2007) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0064-7 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
The maturation of incentive processing and cognitive control
Geier, C., & Luna, B. (2009) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.021 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Phillips, M. L., Manuck, S. B., Worthman, C. M., Moyles, D. L., Tarr, J. A., Sciarrillo, S. R., & Dahl, R. E. (2010) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-201002000-00010 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationHermans, E. J., Bos, P. A., Ossewaarde, L., Ramsey, N. F., Fernández, G., & van Honk, J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.019 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Sex steroids and brain structure in pubertal boys and girls: a mini-review of neuroimaging studies
Peper, J. S., Pol, H. E. H., Crone, E. A., & van Honk, J. (2011) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.014 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationVan Leijenhorst, L., Westenberg, P. M., & Crone, E. A. (2008) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640701884287 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescents’ heightened risk-seeking in a probabilistic gambling task
Burnett, S., Bault, N., Coricelli, G., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2010) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.003 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Shirtcliff, E. A., Granger, D. A., Schwartz, E. B., Curran, M. J., Booth, A., & Overman, W. H. (2000) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1006/hbeh.2000.1614 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The Science of Adolescent Risk-Taking: Workshop Report
Youth and Families Board on Children (2011) · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Estrogen and cognitive aging in women
Sherwin, B. B. (2002) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(02)02093-x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence
Crone, E. A., Bullens, L., van der Plas, E. A. A., Kijkuit, E. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000588 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationLlewellyn, D. J. (2008) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/20445472 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cocosco, 1997, Brain web: online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database, Neuroimage, 5, S452
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
Self-citationThe dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
“…development plays a role n developmental change in the sensitivity of the striatum to reward Braams et al., 2015; Forbes et al., 2010; Op de Macks et al., 2011). or example, a landmark, longitudinal neuroimaging study of chilren, adolescents and young adults (N = 299, ages 8–27) found, as…”
Braams, B. R., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Peper, J. S., & Crone, E. A. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4764-14.2015 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view
Nelson, E. E., Jarcho, J. M., & Guyer, A. E. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.008 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Puberty and the human brain: insights into adolescent development
Vijayakumar, N., Op de Macks, Z., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.004 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Somerville, L. H., Bookheimer, S. Y., Buckner, R. L., Burgess, G. C., Curtiss, S. W., Dapretto, M., Elam, J. S., Gaffrey, M. S., Harms, M. P., Hodge, C., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.050 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Developmental pathways to functional brain networks: emerging principles
Menon, V. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.015 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
The neurobiology of the emotional adolescent: From the inside out
Guyer, A. E., Silk, J. S., & Nelson, E. E. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.037 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Longitudinal four-dimensional mapping of subcortical anatomy in human development
Raznahan, A., Shaw, P. W., Lerch, J. P., Clasen, L. S., Greenstein, D., Berman, R., Pipitone, J., Chakravarty, M. M., & Giedd, J. N. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1316911111 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Puberty and structural brain development in humans
Herting, M. M., & Sowell, E. R. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.12.003 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Shulman, E. P., Harden, K. P., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. D. (2014) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0116-9 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
The Teenage Brain: Surging Hormones—Brain-Behavior Interactions During Puberty
Peper, J. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412473755 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationSilverman, M. H., Jedd, K., & Luciana, M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.083 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Peters, S., Braams, B. R., & Crone, E. A. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.037 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Rewards
Galván, A. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413480859 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
The dual-hormone hypothesis: a brief review and future research agenda
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Understanding the role of puberty in structural and functional development of the adolescent brain
Goddings, A., Beltz, A., Peper, J. S., Crone, E. A., & Braams, B. R. (2019) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12408 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, A. R., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.03.006 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Testosterone and cortisol jointly modulate risk-taking
Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Emergence of sex differences in the development of substance use and abuse during adolescence
Kuhn, C. M. (2015) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.06.003 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
The relationship between puberty and social emotion processing
Goddings, A., Burnett Heyes, S., Bird, G., Viner, R. M., & Blakemore, S. (2012) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01174.x · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The Importance of Puberty for Adolescent Development
Berenbaum, S. A., Beltz, A. M., & Corley, R. P. (2015) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.002 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Schreuders, E., Braams, B. R., Blankenstein, N. E., Peper, J. S., Güroğlu, B., & Crone, E. A. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13056 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationDekkers, T. J., van Rentergem, J. A. A., Meijer, B., Popma, A., Wagemaker, E., & Huizenga, H. M. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.004 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Testosterone and Economic Risk Taking: A Review
Apicella, C. L., Carré, J. M., & Dreber, A. (2015) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-014-0020-2 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Lombardo, M. V., Ashwin, E., Bonnie Auyeung, B., Chakrabarti, B., Lai, M., Taylor, K., Hackett, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., & Baron‐Cohen, S. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.027 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Pfeifer, J. H., Kahn, L. E., Merchant, J. S., Peake, S. J., Veroude, K., Masten, C. L., Lieberman, M. D., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4074-12.2013 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Exciting fear in adolescence: does pubertal development alter threat processing?
Spielberg, J. M., Olino, T. M., Forbes, E. E., & Dahl, R. E. (2014) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.01.004 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationStriatum on the anxiety map: Small detours into adolescence
Lago, T. R., Davis, A. A., Grillon, C., & Ernst, M. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.006 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The Influence of Sex Steroids on Structural Brain Maturation in Adolescence
Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., Peper, J. S., & Crone, E. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083929 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Op de Macks, Z. A., Overgaauw, S., Gunther Moor, B., Dahl, R. E., & Crone, E. A. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.005 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationBeltz, A., & Moser, J. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14255 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Cao, Z., Bennett, M., Orr, C., Icke, I., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., Quinlan, E. B., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24370 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Ladouceur, C. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00065 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ho, T. C., Gifuni, A. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01171-5 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Neural responses to social and monetary reward in early adolescence and emerging adulthood
Ethridge, P., Kujawa, A., Dirks, M. A., Arfer, K. B., Kessel, E. M., Klein, D. N., & Weinberg, A. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12957 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development
Ethridge, P., & Weinberg, A. (2018) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.011 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Becoming a sexual being: The “elephant in the room” of adolescent brain development
Suleiman, A. B., Galván, A., Harden, K. P., & Dahl, R. E. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.09.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationNormative development of ventral striatal resting state connectivity in humans
Fareri, D. S., Gabard-Durnam, L. J., Goff, B., Flannery, J., Gee, D. G., Lumian, D. S., Caldera, C., & Tottenham, N. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.022 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
The Neuroscience of Adolescence
Galván, A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316106143 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Neurocognitive Development of Motivated Behavior: Dynamic Changes across Childhood and Adolescence
Gee, D. G., Bath, K. G., Johnson, C. M., Meyer, H. C., Murty, V. P., van den Bos, W., & Hartley, C. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1674-18.2018 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
de Water, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scheres, A. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12245 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Harden, K. P., Mann, F. D., Grotzinger, A. D., Patterson, M. W., Steinberg, L. D., Tackett, J. L., & Tucker–Drob, E. M. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000172 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Braams, B. R., Peper, J. S., van der Heide, D., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2015) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.014 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationHarden, K. P., Kretsch, N., Mann, F. D., Herzhoff, K., Tackett, J. L., Steinberg, L., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.12.007 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Adolescent brain development and contextual influences: a decade in review
Galván, A. (2021) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12687 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sex Differences in Adolescent Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa: Beyond the Signs and Symptoms
Timko, C. A., DeFilipp, L., & Dakanalis, A. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0988-1 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Ladouceur, C. D., Kerestes, R., Schlund, M. W., Shirtcliff, E. A., Lee, Y., & Dahl, R. E. (2018) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.016 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationHunting for What Works: Adolescents in Addiction Treatment
Silvers, J. A., Squeglia, L. M., Thomsen, K. R., Hudson, K. A., & Ewing, S. W. F. (2019) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.13984 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The endocrinology of human caregiving and its intergenerational transmission
Bos, P. A. (2016) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579416000973 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Risky decision-making in adolescent girls: The role of pubertal hormones and reward circuitry
de Macks, Z. A. O., Bunge, S. A., Bell, O. N., Wilbrecht, L., Kriegsfeld, L. J., Kayser, A. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2016) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.08.013 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neurobiological effects of stress on adolescent decision making
Galván, A., & Rahdar, A. (2012) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.074 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Kujawa, A., Klein, D. N., Pegg, S. L., & Weinberg, A. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100791 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A dual‐axis approach to understanding neuroendocrine development
Shirtcliff, E. A., Dismukes, A. R., Marceau, K., Ruttle, P. L., Simmons, J. G., & Han, G. (2015) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21337 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Urošević, S., Collins, P. F., Muetzel, R. L., Lim, K. O., & Luciana, M. M. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.007 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Scott‐Parker, B., & Weston, L. (2017) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.008 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Knight, E. L., Sarkar, A., Prasad, S., & Mehta, P. H. (2020) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104657 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Neural Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Men
Safron, A., Sylva, D., Klimaj, V., Rosenthal, A. M., Li, M., Walter, M., & Bailey, J. M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep41314 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Pubertal maturation and sex steroids are related to alcohol use in adolescents
de Water, E., Braams, B. R., Crone, E. A., & Peper, J. S. (2013) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.11.018 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Women
Safron, A., Klimaj, V., Sylva, D., Rosenthal, A. M., Li, M., Walter, M., & Bailey, J. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18372-0 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Development of Monetary and Social Reward Processes
Wang, D., Liu, T., & Shi, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11558-6 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Transcriptional signatures of steroid hormones in the striatal neurons and astrocytes
Piechota, M., Korostyński, M., Gołda, S., Ficek, J., Jantas, D., Ziółkowska, B., & Przewłocki, R. (2017) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-017-0352-5 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Puberty and functional brain development in humans: convergence in findings?
Dai, J., & Scherf, K. S. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100690 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A Social-Interactive Neuroscience Approach to Understanding the Developing Brain
Redcay, E., & Warnell, K. R. (2017) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2017.10.001 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Neural Dynamic Responses of Monetary and Social Reward Processes in Adolescents
Wang, D., Liu, T., & Shi, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00141 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Mehta, P. H., DesJardins, N. M. L., van Vugt, M., & Josephs, R. A. (2017) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.03.009 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
van den Bos, R., Davies, W., Dellu-Hagedorn, F., Goudriaan, A. E., Granon, S., Homberg, J. R., Rivalan, M., Swendsen, J. D., & Adriani, W. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.005 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Puberty Predicts Approach But Not Avoidance on the Iowa Gambling Task in a Multinational Sample
Icenogle, G., Steinberg, L. D., Olino, T. M., Shulman, E. P., Chein, J. M., Alampay, L. P., Al‐Hassan, S. M., Takash, H. M. S., Bacchini, D., Chang, L., et al. (2016) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12655 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Adolescent neural response to reward is related to participant sex and task motivation
Alarcón, G., Cservenka, A., & Nagel, B. J. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.10.003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Peper, J. S., Braams, B. R., Blankenstein, N. E., Bos, M. G. N., & Crone, E. A. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13063 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial learning across adolescence: A Bayesian neurocognitive perspective
Hofmans, L., & van den Bos, W. (2022) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101151 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hormones and ethics: Understanding the biological basis of unethical conduct.
Lee, J., Francesca Gino, B., Jin, E. S., Rice, L. K., & Josephs, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000099 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Mehta, P. H., Snyder, N. A., Knight, E. L., & Lassetter, B. (2014) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-014-0014-0 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Orsini, C. A., Truckenbrod, L. M., & Wheeler, A.-R. (2022) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104663 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Positive Affective Neuroendocrinology Approach to Reward and Behavioral Dysregulation
Welker, K. M., Gruber, J., & Mehta, P. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00093 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Let's chat: developmental neural bases of social motivation during real‐time peer interaction
Warnell, K. R., Sadikova, E., & Redcay, E. (2017) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12581 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Cservenka, A., Stroup, M. L., Etkin, A., & Nagel, B. J. (2015) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Suleiman, A. B., Johnson, M. M., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Galván, A. (2015) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12285 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Growing Up or Growing Old? Cellular Aging Linked With Testosterone Reactivity to Stress in Youth
Drury, S. S., Shachet, A., Brett, Z. H., Wren, M. E., Esteves, K. C., Shirtcliff, E. A., Phan, J., Mabile, E., & Theall, K. P. (2014) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/maj.0000000000000299 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
de Water, E., Mies, G. W., Figner, B., Yoncheva, Y. N., van den Bos, W., Castellanos, F. X., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scheres, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.013 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Colich, N. L., Ho, T. C., Ellwood-Lowe, M. E., Foland‐Ross, L. C., Sacchet, M. D., LeMoult, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx073 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hormonal and neural correlates of prosocial conformity in adolescents
Duell, N., van Hoorn, J., McCormick, E. M., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100936 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Evans, K., & Hampson, E. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.011 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Modeling changes in probabilistic reinforcement learning during adolescence
Xia, L., Master, S. L., Eckstein, M. K., Baribault, B., Dahl, R. E., Wilbrecht, L., & Collins, A. G. E. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008524 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationA neuroscience perspective on sexual risk behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood
Victor, E. C., & Hariri, A. R. (2015) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579415001042 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Is early good or bad? Early puberty onset and its consequences for learning
Laube, C., & Fuhrmann, D. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.005 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Knight, E. L., Morales, P. J., Christian, C. B., Prasad, S., Harbaugh, W. T., Mehta, P. H., & Mayr, U. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000305 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Clark, L., Zilioli, S., Eisenegger, C., Gillan, C. M., Deng, H., & Li, H. (2018) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.018 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Pubertal testosterone correlates with adolescent impatience and dorsal striatal activity
Laube, C., Lorenz, R. C., & van den Bos, W. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100749 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Sex difference in the relationship between salivary testosterone and inter-temporal choice
Doi, H., Nishitani, S., & Shinohara, K. (2014) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.005 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Neural Systems Underlying Reward and Approach Behaviors in Childhood and Adolescence
Galván, A. (2013) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2013_240 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Neural Mechanisms of Social Reorientation across Adolescence
van den Bos, W. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2667-13.2013 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Christensen, J., Eyolfson, E., Salberg, S., & Mychasiuk, R. (2020) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2020.100943 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Kahn, L. E., Peake, S. J., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00694 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
de Macks, Z. A. O., Bunge, S. A., Bell, O. N., Kriegsfeld, L. J., Kayser, A. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw125 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationDir, A. L., Hummer, T. A., Aalsma, M. C., & Hulvershorn, L. A. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100634 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
An exploratory analysis of testosterone, cortisol, and aggressive behavior type in men and women
Armstrong, T. A., Wells, J., Boisvert, D. L., Lewis, R. H., Cooke, E. M., Woeckener, M., & Kavish, N. (2021) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108073 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Chan, S. Y., Ong, Z. Y., Ngoh, Z. M., Chong, Y. S., Zhou, J. H., Fortier, M. V., Daniel, L. M., Qiu, A., Meaney, M. J., & Tan, A. P. (2022) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101107 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Asymmetric neural tracking of gain and loss magnitude during adolescence
Insel, C., & Somerville, L. H. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy058 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kutlikova, H. H., Zhang, L., Eisenegger, C., van Honk, J., & Lamm, C. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01570-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Op de Macks, Z. A., Moor, B. G., Overgaauw, S., Güroğlu, B., Dahl, R. E., & Crone, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 506-516
- ISSN
- 1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6987540
- OpenAlex
- W2010914795
- Semantic Scholar
- 2b2021f2ba2b23b9d330e733786c77a55267f3a9
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- testosterone, ventral striatum, monetary rewards, adolescents, puberty, gonadal hormones, risk-taking, gambling task, reward processing, individual differences, pubertal development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Basal Ganglia, Child, Female, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Risk-Taking, Testosterone, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review