Cited by 1,768Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment

de Quervain, Dominique J.-F., Fischbacher, Urs, Treyer, Valerie, Schellhammer, Melanie, Schnyder, Ulrich, Buck, Alfred, Fehr, Ernst·2004·Science

Abstract

Many people voluntarily incur costs to punish violations of social norms. Evolutionary models and empirical evidence indicate that such altruistic punishment has been a decisive force in the evolution of human cooperation. We used H 2 15 O positron emission tomography to examine the neural basis for altruistic punishment of defectors in an economic exchange. Subjects could punish defection either symbolically or effectively. Symbolic punishment did not reduce the defector's economic payoff, whereas effective punishment did reduce the payoff. We scanned the subjects' brains while they learned about the defector's abuse of trust and determined the punishment. Effective punishment, as compared with symbolic punishment, activated the dorsal striatum, which has been implicated in the processing of rewards that accrue as a result of goal-directed actions. Moreover, subjects with stronger activations in the dorsal striatum were willing to incur greater costs in order to punish. Our findings support the hypothesis that people derive satisfaction from punishing norm violations and that the activation in the dorsal striatum reflects the anticipated satisfaction from punishing defectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1100735

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altruistic punishment is a prominent solution to the challenge of free riding.

    “Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Neuro-economic experiments show that moralistic emotions have a physiological basis.

    “Neuro-economic experiments show that these emotions have a physiological basis 15-17 .”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Neurobiological variables have only rarely been used as predictors of individual differences in altruism.

    “and neurobiological variables have only rarely been used as predictors of individual differences in altruism (de Quervain et al., 2004;Harbaugh et al., 2007;Hare et al., 2010;Moll et al., 2006;Tricomi et al., 2010).”
  • The striatum displays signals related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly.

    “The striatum displays signals that are related to making a decision to punish someone for acting unfairly 96, 97, as well as related to observing a punishment meted out to someone who has acted unfairly 98.”
  • Increased dorsal striatum activity is associated with a decision to punish a partner who has acted unfairly, even when we must incur a cost to punish the partner.

    “Increased dorsal striatum activity is associated with a decision to punish a partner who has acted unfairly, even when we must incur a cost to punish the partner 96, 97.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E.
Affiliations
  • Division of Psychiatry Research, University of Zurich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8029 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Fischbacher, Urs
  • Fehr, Ernst
Venue
Science
Published
2004-08-27
Volume
305
Issue
5688
Pages
1254-1258
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1825286732
Cited by
1,768
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 119
FWCI
249.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
altruistic punishment, social norms, evolution of cooperation, dorsal striatum, symbolic punishment, breach of trust, economic exchange
MeSH terms
Adult, Altruism, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Corpus Striatum, Emotions, Frontal Lobe, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Punishment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Thalamus, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review